MarioWiki:Appeals: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Advanced mobile edit
Tags: Replaced Manual revert Mobile edit Advanced mobile edit
 
Line 3: Line 3:


==Cases==
==Cases==
===[[User:Big Super Mario Fan|Big Super Mario Fan]]===
''None at the moment.''
*[[User talk:Big Super Mario Fan#Last warning]]
====[[User:Big Super Mario Fan|Big Super Mario Fan]]====
*This final warning was completely unnecessary. Because the games where all listet from oldest to newest already. I just put them in one section. This has nothing to do with a proposal. Those remakes where already in the right order. I didn't Chance that. Those "drastic changes" for NSMB. U may have been to much. But now they are using some things that I did. So I was still helpful. A lastwarn is for no reason valid. Because I never have a bad intention when I edit. I always try to help.
====[[User:Mario|Mario]]====
*Outlined in the warning message, you have made changes that integrated the remake with the main series[https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Mario_%26_Luigi_(series)&oldid=4213496] which is identical to what you were attempting to effect from an ongoing proposal[https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Proposals&diff=prev&oldid=4210283]. This is still breaking the rules, and you should be aware of the proposals you make while you are making changes. That being said, even if the last warning isn't legitimate, you are still under two warnings for making drastic changes without discussion as well as inappropriate formatting in your comment, so a lastwarn, for a different reason, should still be valid.

Latest revision as of 14:15, May 18, 2024

This page is an appeal system for reminders, warnings, and last warnings. If you feel you have wrongly received a reminder or a warning, follow the instructions below to appeal the reminder/warning to the administrators. Please keep discussions civil.

Archived appeals can be found here.

This page observes the no-signature policy.

Notes[edit]

If you feel that you have been wrongfully given a reminder and/or warning, you can have your case heard here. Please read through the "How-to" and the "Rules" carefully. Please note that both the users appealing the reminder/warning and the users who issued the reminder/warning are given a chance to present the administrators with reasons to rule in their favor. However, said comments can only be edited once; this will not expand into lengthy, back-and-forth arguments such as the ones found in proposal comments and talk page discussions.

Rules[edit]

  1. No case can be heard more than once. Once a decision is made, that decision is final.
  2. If the reminder or warning you issued is overturned, do not re-add it, or it will be removed immediately, and you may be reprimanded yourself if the administrators feel it is necessary.

How-to[edit]

This is an example of what your appeal should look like; improperly formatted appeals will be deleted. If you are inexperienced or unsure how to set up this format, simply copy the following template and paste it into the fitting section. Then replace the "[subject]" variables (including the squared brackets) with information to customize your proposal.

===[Your username here]===
*[Insert link to reminder/warning from your talk page]
====[Your username here]====
*[Insert your comments on why the reminder/warning was unnecessary]
====[The issuer of the warning's username here]====
*[Insert your comments on why the reminder/warning was necessary (this section is for the issuer only)]
----

Important: After posting your appeal, make sure that you use {{AppealNotice}} to inform the issuer that his or her warning/reminder is under dispute.

Cases[edit]

None at the moment.