User talk:Wildgoosespeeder: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→My old image replace-a-thon pages: Comment.) |
|||
| Line 250: | Line 250: | ||
I've made a response to both you and Tucayo [[User_talk:Henry_Tucayo_Clay#Sandbox_Policy.3F|in his talk page]]. {{User:RAP/sig}} 00:31, 12 April 2016 (EDT) | I've made a response to both you and Tucayo [[User_talk:Henry_Tucayo_Clay#Sandbox_Policy.3F|in his talk page]]. {{User:RAP/sig}} 00:31, 12 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
==Image-quality tags== | |||
In all honesty, bloating that category with more and more images is bothering me more and more, as it means more things to sift through, and more to be said on how lax the guidelines are when it comes to these tags. I was pretty close to making a TPP shutting down the current use of the image templates but my twin made me realize that I should probably hold it off until your proposal is finished developing. Besides, maybe you probably should stop tagging it; your future proposal will probably create a separate split of image-quality templates (that one idea that I like; we have different templates for different types of bad writing, so why not several different ones for different images, as they have different purposes and qualities) and I think you might have to do some extra work in the future, replacing the general image-quality one with a more specialized one? I think you should focus on ironing out your proposal, then you can tag the images that have problems. | |||
Maybe I'm counting chickens (or geese for that matter ha ha ha) before they hatch but I do fully support on the idea of different image-quality template to communicate image problems better. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 22:39, 13 April 2016 (EDT) | |||
