71
edits
Talk:Donkey Kong: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Buddy Christ (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
Then there's the theory that the present DK and the original are one and the same, but this is because of Mario vs. DK, that said "Mario faces his original nemesis", but this doesn't state that the DK in that game is the original Donkey Kong, just that he's A Donkey Kong, plus, also considering that DK as the original, that just means the game is placed shortly after the original DK, and the character is a young Cranky. | Then there's the theory that the present DK and the original are one and the same, but this is because of Mario vs. DK, that said "Mario faces his original nemesis", but this doesn't state that the DK in that game is the original Donkey Kong, just that he's A Donkey Kong, plus, also considering that DK as the original, that just means the game is placed shortly after the original DK, and the character is a young Cranky. | ||
I think that's all. Whoa.--[[User:Kombatgod|Kombatgod]] 20:56, 25 March 2009 (EDT) | I think that's all. Whoa.--[[User:Kombatgod|Kombatgod]] 20:56, 25 March 2009 (EDT) | ||
One thing I never understood is why people think Cranky can't be both DK's father AND grandfather. Many people are adopted and raised by their biological grandparents, thus making them their adoptive parents. The quotes from DKC and DK64 seem to indicate that this is the case (Cranky raised DK as his son, but is his biological grandfather. Thus the current DK can be a grown up DK Jr. and still be Cranky's biological grandson. [[User:Buddy Christ|Buddy Christ]] ([[User talk:Buddy Christ|talk]]) | |||
== Trivia == | == Trivia == | ||