MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario Party: The Top 100: Difference between revisions

MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario Party: The Top 100 (view source)

958 bytes removed , 7 years ago

Complaint has been dealt with.

48,332

edits

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 {{FANOMSTAT
 |nominated=19:31, 28 November 2017 (EST)
-|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2012) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
+|passed=20:42, 28 November 2017
 }}
 ==== Support ====
@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 ==== Oppose ====
-#{{User|Time Turner}} The section for the "other characters" is far too sparse. It lacks detail and it doesn't even have any images. The [[MarioWiki:Empty sections|Empty section policy]] even states how "[p]age sections are not meant to just be hyperlinks," and that definitely shouldn't only apply to the sections at the bottom of the page.
 ==== Removal of opposes ====
-'''Time Turner'''
-#{{User|Owencrazyboy9}} <s>Other featured articles, like Mario Party 9 and Mario Party: Star Rush, for example, have a barren character list with no imagery, etc. There's no reason this can't be an exception.</s> Baby Luigi has actually improved the other characters section, mentioning which minigames each character appears in, but still my judgment still stands.
-#{{User|YoshiStar28}} This is not an exception but other featured articles have a character list.
 ==== Comments ====
 "Other people also do it" is a bad reason to support anything. What do you have to say about the policy that I linked to? {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 21:37, 28 November 2017 (EST)