39,656
edits
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
:::I think it needs more sources. I know this is minor, but the image captions kind of bug me because they're all really similar (Character, doing thing.) [[User:Scrooge200|Scrooge200]] ([[User talk:Scrooge200|talk]]) 17:53, 11 February 2019 (EST) | :::I think it needs more sources. I know this is minor, but the image captions kind of bug me because they're all really similar (Character, doing thing.) [[User:Scrooge200|Scrooge200]] ([[User talk:Scrooge200|talk]]) 17:53, 11 February 2019 (EST) | ||
::::Improved the image captions. As for the sources, which things specifically need more sources? {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 18:01, 11 February 2019 (EST) | ::::Improved the image captions. As for the sources, which things specifically need more sources? {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 18:01, 11 February 2019 (EST) | ||
:::::I don't think there definitely ''needs'' to be more sources. One point of contention that wouldn't make me outright oppose the nomination is that the trivia is a bit overly long; for example, the trivia point referring to the episode's Internet meme would probably do better in its own section, along with a hatnote referring to the appropriate section in [[List of Mario references on the Internet]]. | |||
:::::I'm also perring Bazooka Mario in that the developer interview ''might'' be better suited in a "Development" section, provided we can find a little more info on the episode's development. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 18:13, 11 February 2019 (EST) |
edits