MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario: Difference between revisions

m
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
{{FANOMFAIL
|nominated=13:58, 16 January 2010 (EST)
|nominated=13:58, 16 January 2010 (EST)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=16:07, 4 August 2010
}}
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
<!-- please do not vote anymore, it has failed -->
#{{User|Garlic Man}} - Plenty of content, well-written, sufficient images, very few red links.
#{{User|Garlic Man}} - Plenty of content, well-written, sufficient images, very few red links.
#{{User|MATEOELBACAN}}
#{{User|MATEOELBACAN}}
Line 39: Line 41:
#{{User|BobombFuses}}
#{{User|BobombFuses}}
#{{User|Naspee}}
#{{User|Naspee}}
#{{User|Nucleartoad24}}
#{{User|Blakzer}}


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
<!-- Please do not vote anymore this has failed -->
#{{User|Reversinator}} Interactions with other characters and Appearances outside of electronic media can surely have more information. Also, comics, Mario Paint, Dr. Mario, Super Mario Land series, Mario & Wario, Mario's Early Years series, Mario's Picross,  are missing, and Mario Party series, Mario Sports series and Super Smash Bros. series are in need of expanding.  
#{{User|Reversinator}} Interactions with other characters and Appearances outside of electronic media can surely have more information. Also, comics, Mario Paint, Dr. Mario, Super Mario Land series, Mario & Wario, Mario's Early Years series, Mario's Picross,  are missing, and Mario Party series, Mario Sports series and Super Smash Bros. series are in need of expanding.  
#{{User|ForeverDaisy09}} This article is terrible. It's poorly written, poorly organised, missing vital information, and doesn't cover anything well at all. It is by far one of the worst character articles on this site.
#{{User|ForeverDaisy09}} This article is terrible. It's poorly written, poorly organised, missing vital information, and doesn't cover anything well at all. It is by far one of the worst character articles on this site.
Line 57: Line 62:
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} ForeverDaisy09 is way too vague. Can he just specify is his complaints so we can detect it and catch it? And a good deal of his complaints at the comments section are kinda uh... bad reasons. And why he thinks SCREENSHOTS are missing? And what about power-ups being written differently than others? At least the other people try to give a specific reason without stating it on the comments section.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} ForeverDaisy09 is way too vague. Can he just specify is his complaints so we can detect it and catch it? And a good deal of his complaints at the comments section are kinda uh... bad reasons. And why he thinks SCREENSHOTS are missing? And what about power-ups being written differently than others? At least the other people try to give a specific reason without stating it on the comments section.
#{{User|KS3}} Per all.
#{{User|KS3}} Per all.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
Line 230: Line 234:


The same thing should apply to other major articles such as [[Luigi]], [[Princess Peach]], [[Bowser]], [[Donkey Kong]], [[Yoshi]], [[Wario]], etc. {{User|Commander Code-8}}
The same thing should apply to other major articles such as [[Luigi]], [[Princess Peach]], [[Bowser]], [[Donkey Kong]], [[Yoshi]], [[Wario]], etc. {{User|Commander Code-8}}
:For an article of this size, only three references? Looking at the requirements for being a featured article on this Wiki: "'''…be sourced with all available sources and Mario-related appearances.'''" Clearly, the lack of references tells us that this article cannot be featured quality by the standards put in place and should be failed if this is not fixed. - [[User:NARCE|NARCE]] 03:23, 13 July 2010 (UTC)