42,939
edits
MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Kiddy Kong: Difference between revisions
MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Kiddy Kong (edit)
Revision as of 11:59, September 14, 2016
, 7 years agoPorplemontage moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Kiddy Kong to MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Kiddy Kong: Fix
m (Porplemontage moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Kiddy Kong to MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Kiddy Kong: Fix) |
|||
| (32 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{UNFANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated= | |nominated=18:08, February 7th, 2011 (GMT) | ||
| | |lastedit=18:08, May 7th, 2011 | ||
|nosupport=true | |||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|DKPetey99}} Per Thoth. | |||
#{{User|Thoth}} The article is riddled with minor grammatical errors, has non-canonical information, and seems more like a fanfic than an article in some places. It's a good article, but I don't think it's good enough to be featured. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
| Line 11: | Line 15: | ||
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} - Per BLOF. It doesn't matter if he only appeared once, the article is very well written (for a character who only appeared once, that is). | #{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} - Per BLOF. It doesn't matter if he only appeared once, the article is very well written (for a character who only appeared once, that is). | ||
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Per my comments. | #{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Per my comments. | ||
#{{User| | #{{User|CalebArisas}} - What is wrong about this article? It is perfectly fine, and is loaded with the information you want. Per all. This article stays featured. | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} I really do not see anything seriously wrong here. This article has the quality of a featured article. | |||
#{{User|Magikrazy51}} For a character whose only been in two games, a remake and a German comic, it's pretty good. | |||
#{{User|Catboy41}} Per all. | |||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
| Line 22: | Line 28: | ||
@DKPetey: It doesn't have to be as big as the [[SSBB]] article to be featured. It's long enough, has everything it needs, and follows all of the standards for a FA. {{User|Fawfulfury65}} | @DKPetey: It doesn't have to be as big as the [[SSBB]] article to be featured. It's long enough, has everything it needs, and follows all of the standards for a FA. {{User|Fawfulfury65}} | ||
:DKPetey: Who are you referring to? I'll add everything necessary to make your vote, er, count. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | :DKPetey: Who are you referring to? I'll add everything necessary to make your vote, er, count. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
::Look, here's the template you're supposed to make the "Removal of Support/Oppose Votes" just to clear things up: | |||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | |||
;{{User|Username of vote you want to remove}} | |||
#{{User|Your username}} - Reason on removal | |||
{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | |||
@FF65, yeah just keep it featured! [[User:DKPetey99|DKPetey99]] 18:09, 31 March 2011 (EDT) | |||
You should have let the proposal die DX {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | |||
@LeftyGreenMario, how can I let it die? {{User|DKPetey99}} | |||
:You leave it unedited for a month. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | |||
:@FireMario: You have to add a valid reason soon or the thing will not be unfeatured. {{User|Marioguy1}} | |||
Thoth: Please read [[MarioWiki:Canonicity|here]]. Nintendo has not established an official canon so the line between canon and non-canon is not defined. We are forced to cover every official appearance. Canon arguments are still going and we have to cover everything to be as neutral as we can. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | |||