MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Koopa Bros.: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
{{UNFANOMFAIL|nominated=21:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)|lastedit=2010-09-04 18:02:50}}  
|nominated=21:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|BluePikminKong497}} Well, ther is a construction template, and the article is very short. It also lack info.
 
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} There is no more template. It's still quite long for a group of characters that only appeared in one game. I don't see where this article lacks information either.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} There is no more template. It's still quite long for a group of characters that only appeared in one game. I don't see where this article lacks information either.
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Like what I said earlier, what information does it lack? The template ceases to exist. It's long enough to maintain a featured article standard
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Like what I said earlier, what information does it lack? The template ceases to exist. It's long enough to maintain a featured article standard
#{{User|Fuzzipede27}} Per all.
#{{User|Booderdash}} Per Fuzzipede27
#{{User|CosmicRedToad}} Per Booderdash.
#{{User|Green Falcon}} I say it should stay. There is nothing wrong with it. I think it does have enough info to keep FA status. And it has stragedies. Keep it, or Bowser will send his minions after you!


==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
Line 17: Line 18:


@BPK497: What areas are lacking in information? {{User|Fawfulfury65}}
@BPK497: What areas are lacking in information? {{User|Fawfulfury65}}
Isn't this failed? No supporters... {{User|Booderdash}}

Latest revision as of 10:59, September 14, 2016

Koopa Bros.[edit]

Koopa Bros. was nominated to be unfeatured at 21:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC).

Koopa Bros. failed unfeaturing requirements at 18:02, 4 October 2010, and is currently able to be renominated.

Remove Featured Article Status[edit]

Keep Featured Article Status[edit]

  1. LeftyGreenMario (talk) There is no more template. It's still quite long for a group of characters that only appeared in one game. I don't see where this article lacks information either.
  2. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Like what I said earlier, what information does it lack? The template ceases to exist. It's long enough to maintain a featured article standard
  3. Fuzzipede27 (talk) Per all.
  4. Booderdash (talk) Per Fuzzipede27
  5. CosmicRedToad (talk) Per Booderdash.
  6. Green Falcon (talk) I say it should stay. There is nothing wrong with it. I think it does have enough info to keep FA status. And it has stragedies. Keep it, or Bowser will send his minions after you!

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes[edit]

Comments[edit]

What info does it lack? It seems to have all information possible. Plus, the tense template ceases to exist, since I corrected it. The article is just long enough, in my opinion. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

@BPK497: What areas are lacking in information? Fawfulfury65 (talk)

Isn't this failed? No supporters... Booderdash (talk)

Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/Unfeature/N1/Koopa_Bros.&oldid=2057041"