43,624
edits
MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Diddy Kong: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "<br clear=all>" to "{{br}}"
m (removed a blocked users vote) |
m (Text replacement - "<br clear=all>" to "{{br}}") |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated=5 August 2011, 11:07 GMT | |nominated=5 August 2011, 11:07 GMT | ||
| | |lastedit=18:41, 6 November 2011 | ||
|nosupport=true | |||
}} | }} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
| Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||
#{{User|Conanshinichi}} | #{{User|Conanshinichi}} | ||
#{{User|Technickal}} | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
#{{User|Reversinator}} Half of the sections are missing images, and at the same time, all the images that are there are cluttering the article.<nowiki> | #{{User|Reversinator}} Half of the sections are missing images, and at the same time, all the images that are there are cluttering the article.<nowiki> {{br}}</nowiki> should be used in there. Also, the article is in the past tense when it should be in the present tense. Also, a few of the sentances are too fancy, such as ''"Trouble once again brewed in Donkey Kong 64. King K. Rool, hungry for revenge, attempts to attack Donkey Kong Island."'' | ||
#{{User|Yoshiwaker}} - Per Reversinator, and a lot of the sections could use more info. | #{{User|Yoshiwaker}} - Per Reversinator, and a lot of the sections could use more info. | ||
#{{User|Superfiremario}} Per all. | #{{User|Superfiremario}} Per all. | ||
| Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}: Per all. | #{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}: Per all. | ||
#{{User|GEX}} per all | #{{User|GEX}} per all | ||
#{{User|KS3}} Per Fawfulfury65, and a few of the sections are very short. | |||
==== Removal of Support/Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Opposes ==== | ||
| Line 23: | Line 26: | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Look at my comment. If an article is written like a story (hence, fancy sentences), many people consider it to be biased, too flowery, and poorly written. Just because it isn't in the rules doesn't mean it is good or bad. The rules aren't everything; they are just basic guidelines. Anyway, I don't see any problem with this article, since I fixed most of the stuff. | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Look at my comment. If an article is written like a story (hence, fancy sentences), many people consider it to be biased, too flowery, and poorly written. Just because it isn't in the rules doesn't mean it is good or bad. The rules aren't everything; they are just basic guidelines. Anyway, I don't see any problem with this article, since I fixed most of the stuff. | ||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Per LGM | #{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Per LGM | ||
#{{User|KS3}} Even though I oppose for this article to be featured, all the things Reversinator mentioned looked liked they are fixed. | |||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||