407,426
edits
Template talk:Vacation: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "([Pp]roposal|[Ss]ettled)(Outcome|TPP)" to "$1 $2"
m (→No!!!!!!!!) |
m (Text replacement - "([Pp]roposal|[Ss]ettled)(Outcome|TPP)" to "$1 $2") |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Delete Template:Vacation== | ==Delete Template:Vacation== | ||
{{ | {{settled TPP}} | ||
{{Proposal outcome|failed|11-14|don't delete}} | |||
Really? A notice template for users only? If is mainly user oriented, I say we should delete. And if you really want a template like this, I suggest you make it yourself in your userpage. If you can make it yourself in your userpage, then I say this template is useless. | Really? A notice template for users only? If is mainly user oriented, I say we should delete. And if you really want a template like this, I suggest you make it yourself in your userpage. If you can make it yourself in your userpage, then I say this template is useless. | ||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
Calm down' the talk page proposal said that it won't be deleted. {{User:Joseph/sig}} | Calm down' the talk page proposal said that it won't be deleted. {{User:Joseph/sig}} | ||
== Really? == | |||
Do we really need this? It's hardly ever used and Users can easily place a status bar or something on their userpage to say that they're on vacation. In fact, no active user is using it at all right now. People really don't go on vacation that often. They go inactive far more often, yet the [[Template talk:Gone|Gone template]] was deleted (for the same reasons I think this one should be). Yes, I see the proposal above, but it didn't fail by a very big margin.<br> | |||
{{User:Ultimate Mr. L/sig}} 21:55, 17 October 2017 (EDT) | |||
:I used it just recently, and so have a few others. I think it's a nice thing to have. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 21:57, 17 October 2017 (EDT) | |||
::I wish I had known about it when I first joined. Either way "People really don't go on vacation that often" is ''immeasurably'' subjective at best and outright false at worst. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 22:01, 17 October 2017 (EDT) | |||