408,324
edits
MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story: Difference between revisions
MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story (edit)
Revision as of 17:41, May 31, 2024
, 5 months agoText replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice"
Time Turner (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{ | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FA archive notice|unfeature=yes}} | ||
| | ''Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story'' became unfeatured at 8:02, 31 March 2013 | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|GreenDisaster}} This article has the same problems as its prequel, ''[[Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time]]''. The story section is padded beyond belief with fanciful sentences, unnecessary details, and is generally horrible grammar-wise, the trivia section is clogged, it doesn't follow the empty section policy, it has a well-deserved rewrite-expand template for its item section (added before this nomination and not by me), since it only covers consumable items... I think I've gone over everything that's problematic with this article. | #{{User|GreenDisaster}} This article has the same problems as its prequel, ''[[Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time]]''. The story section is padded beyond belief with fanciful sentences, unnecessary details, and is generally horrible grammar-wise, the trivia section is clogged, it doesn't follow the empty section policy, it has a well-deserved rewrite-expand template for its item section (added before this nomination and not by me), since it only covers consumable items... I think I've gone over everything that's problematic with this article. | ||