319
edits
Talk:List of enemies: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Nintendo101 (talk | contribs) (→Comments, suggestions and questions: Per Power Flotzo's suggestion) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 171: | Line 171: | ||
== The ultimate proposal for division of variants == | == The ultimate proposal for division of variants == | ||
{{TPP}} | {{Settled TPP}} | ||
{{Proposal outcome|cancelled}} | |||
Well, this is probably my most important proposal so far. I designed this proposal to address a problem that has existed for a long time on the wiki: the separation of enemies that are variants of different colors or different appearances. This has been a huge problem for the wiki, causing very questionable mergers and splits, causing arguments between users. For my part, I find it unfair that, for example, enemy variants with different names and different functions are merged because they are the same individuals, while other enemies, such as Sub-Goomba and Itsunomanika Heihō, are split, having minimal changes compared to their original variants. | Well, this is probably my most important proposal so far. I designed this proposal to address a problem that has existed for a long time on the wiki: the separation of enemies that are variants of different colors or different appearances. This has been a huge problem for the wiki, causing very questionable mergers and splits, causing arguments between users. For my part, I find it unfair that, for example, enemy variants with different names and different functions are merged because they are the same individuals, while other enemies, such as Sub-Goomba and Itsunomanika Heihō, are split, having minimal changes compared to their original variants. | ||
| Line 205: | Line 206: | ||
===Comments, suggestions and questions=== | ===Comments, suggestions and questions=== | ||
I had already shared this with Sorbetti on their talk page, but I have been working with another user on a very similar policy proposal for multiple months. The (mostly complete, but still <u>unfinished</u>) draft can be viewed [[User:Nintendo101/flowerpot|here]]. It is aimed at clarifying our enemy coverage on the site, and would create the breathing room for colored variants to receive their own articles. The draft I have been working on has been a very big time commitment and incorporates some nuances not reflected in Sorbetti's proposal, and I asked them if they would be willing to withdraw there's. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 15:40, March 16, 2025 (EDT) | I had already shared this with Sorbetti on their talk page, but I have been working with another user on a very similar policy proposal for multiple months. The (mostly complete, but still <u>unfinished</u>) draft can be viewed [[User:Nintendo101/flowerpot|here]]. It is aimed at clarifying our enemy coverage on the site, and would create the breathing room for colored variants to receive their own articles. The draft I have been working on has been a very big time commitment and incorporates some nuances not reflected in Sorbetti's proposal, and I asked them if they would be willing to withdraw there's. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 15:40, March 16, 2025 (EDT) | ||
:I understand, in that case I will cancel this proposal and wait for a more detailed one from you.[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]]) 15:44, March 16, 2025 (EDT) | |||