Category talk:Blocked users: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "^([A-Za-z0-9][^:])" to "==(First topic)== $1"
m (Text replacement - "^([A-Za-z0-9][^:])" to "==(First topic)== $1")
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==(First topic)==
Is this category ever used? If not we should start using it. Anybody willing to take care of it?{{User:Knife/sig}} 20:05, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
Is this category ever used? If not we should start using it. Anybody willing to take care of it?{{User:Knife/sig}} 20:05, 20 March 2007 (EDT)


Line 65: Line 66:


Is it possible for one to block themselves? Obviously, I don't want to try for myself. ~[[User: Why Bother|Why Bother]]
Is it possible for one to block themselves? Obviously, I don't want to try for myself. ~[[User: Why Bother|Why Bother]]
The answer is no. Only sysops and patrollers have the power to ban users anyways, so it wouldn't be possible for you to attempt anyways.--{{User:UltraMario3000/sig}}
:An admin could block himself although it's frowned upon {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}}
::What's an admin or a sysop or a patroller? Are those the authorities who you see on all the blocked user pages?
:::Yes there the ones who block users and prolly do other things as well {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}}
== Is this Category Nessisary? ==
I mean, the list of recent blocked users can also be seen in the Special Pages in the Users and Rights section. [[User:Jigglypuff|Jigglypuff]] ([[User talk:Jigglypuff|talk]]) 00:54, 2 March 2018 (EST)
== Reorganizing Categories ==
Can the blocked users whose name begin with numbers be in a category that ranges from 0-9 instead of just individual numbers? Wikipedia uses that system. [[User:Mari0fan100|Mari0fan100]] ([[User talk:Mari0fan100|talk]]) 20:43, 21 January 2019 (EST)
:Not sure if there's a way to set it up like that, unless we make a manual list from scratch. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 00:04, 22 January 2019 (EST)