145,662
edits
User talk:KingGeoshiKoopshi64: Difference between revisions
→RE: Shady Koopas vs. Underground Koopas: new section
(→RE: Shady Koopas vs. Underground Koopas: new section) |
|||
| Line 479: | Line 479: | ||
:After some consideration a bit more from reading your reply to me on here, I decided to agree with everything you said now, after all I did let it go with GBA Riverside Park's potential motifs out no problem. Sorry if it sounded like I came to you in a very snarky way the way my tone may seem or sound from my response to you, I've decided to just let it go for the time being, I will admit that I do get a little bit defensive when people conflict with my edits even when I factual give enough good evidence, which happened to me in the past, I will wait until Brian Tyler says something about that "scary" track even though I never expected [[Wario's Battle Canyon]] to be added to the track even if the ''Mario Party'' series is more closer to the mainline games anyway and a bit obscure to go with for a random ''Mario Party'' track like that one, the difference being he confirmed that one. I did listen from a podcast that ''[[The Super Mario Bros. Movie]]'' does not take any liberties from the Mario RPGs which I can understand you more now. --[[User:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|KingGeoshiKoopshi64]] ([[User talk:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|talk]]) 00:28, April 26, 2023 (EDT) | :After some consideration a bit more from reading your reply to me on here, I decided to agree with everything you said now, after all I did let it go with GBA Riverside Park's potential motifs out no problem. Sorry if it sounded like I came to you in a very snarky way the way my tone may seem or sound from my response to you, I've decided to just let it go for the time being, I will admit that I do get a little bit defensive when people conflict with my edits even when I factual give enough good evidence, which happened to me in the past, I will wait until Brian Tyler says something about that "scary" track even though I never expected [[Wario's Battle Canyon]] to be added to the track even if the ''Mario Party'' series is more closer to the mainline games anyway and a bit obscure to go with for a random ''Mario Party'' track like that one, the difference being he confirmed that one. I did listen from a podcast that ''[[The Super Mario Bros. Movie]]'' does not take any liberties from the Mario RPGs which I can understand you more now. --[[User:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|KingGeoshiKoopshi64]] ([[User talk:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|talk]]) 00:28, April 26, 2023 (EDT) | ||
== RE: Shady Koopas vs. Underground Koopas == | |||
I was going to explain the edit after I was done for the day but didn't have time. If you want someone to understand the point you're trying to get across, I would suggest not writing a giant wall of really hard-to-read text expecting them to have the time to read it all. From what I can tell, it seems like you're just overanalysing and reaching in trying to find a connection between the Shady Koopas and underground Koopas without it being as obvious as the Gloombas and underground Goombas, when the point behind the edit was that the Koopas look similar, when they clearly don't ([[File:SMB NES Blue Koopa Troopa Walking.gif|30px]][[File:Sky Blue Troopa.png|30px]]) in the same way the Goombas do ([[File:SMBBlueGoomba.gif|30px]][[File:PMTTYDGloomba.png|30px]]). Even if it's possible they intended for it to be what a Koopa looks like in shade, it could have been a design separate from underground Koopas since they hardly look similar. If its shell was as dark as the Gloombas and it had darker skin as opposed to paler/desaturated-coloured skin (I disagree it would have blended in with the collar and sunglasses), then I'd agree it'd look similar or even be a reference. The ''SSBU'' Piranha Plant costume similarity is notable because they would have likely based any of the seven alternate costumes on something (as most costumes are), and the underground Piranha Plants would be the closest. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 22:44, May 16, 2023 (EDT) | |||