MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Chain Chomp

Chain Chomp

Support

1. Booderdash (talk) A very good article with all its sections good and long. The images had been improved, and it just matches every single critieria on the Featured Article page.

Oppose

1. Fawfulfury65 (talk) The section for its Adventures of Super Mario Bros. 3 appearance can definitely be expanded.
2. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Hm, the only problem now are those Paper Mario templates.
3. KS3 (talk) Per all.
4. Commander Code-8 (talk) There could be a lot more images in the article (mainly in the spin-off section). Also, Per LeftyGreenMario.
5. Baby Mario Bloops (talk) - It's okay, but more images in some areas, some rearraning in more parts so that it fits (like images should go from left to right to left to right or at least balance out so that it is not all to the right).
6. NARCE (talk)

Removal of Opposes

Fawfulfury65

1. Booderdash (talk) Adventures have been expanded.
2. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Never watched the show, but the section looks like it has enough info.

Commander Code-8

1. Booderdash (talk) There are enough images now.
2. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Per Booderdash.

Narce

1. Booderdash (talk) There is no need for sources. All information is ingame.
2. KS3 (talk) Having no reason is not a good enough reason why you should oppose.

Comments

I think its fixed up alot now.Booderdash (talk)

Baby Mario Bloops, I really don't think we need that more images. Which sections do you suggest more images? Also I have no idea how to fix the Paper Mario templates. Any help? Booderdash (talk)

There are too many short sections (ie: Mario Kart 64, Mario Party 7, Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga, etc). KS3 (talk)

For Superstar Saga, its because Chain Chomps didn't actually appear in that game. And CAN Mario Kart 64 be any longer? I don't have that game. I'll try Mario Party 7. Booderdash (talk)

No, they play a very minor role in MK64. Everything they do is already written there. Fawfulfury65 (talk)

Lacks any form of references. Looking at the requirements for being a featured article on this Wiki: "…be sourced with all available sources and Mario-related appearances." Clearly, the lack of references tells us that this article cannot be featured quality by the standards put in place and should be failed if this is not fixed. - NARCE 03:21, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Narce nearly all the information are Ingame. This isn't wikipedia where even they don't have to have ingame information sourced. Only the game articles have references. As you can see the Mario article itself only has 3 references. If we go by your standards, nearly all of the FAs don't belong on the list. Booderdash (talk)

But not all, sir. The trivia section does not explain where this information comes from, and the personality section is likely written based on a writer's observations. - NARCE 04:36, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Only the first one in the trivia section. The other two CAN be found ingame. Look at Paper Mario the game and it IS hyphenated. Buy a japanese mario game, and it IS called Wanwan. Plus the personality thing is in nearly every article. Should Genos article be unfeatured? Baby Peach? Booderdash (talk)