| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| __NOTOC__ | | __NOTOC__ |
| ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== |
| {{UNFANOMFAIL | | {{UNFANOMSTAT |
| |nominated=17:16, 12 May 2011 | | |nominated=17:16, 12 May 2011 (EDT) |
| |lastedit=03:32, 24 September 2011 | | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet by copying it from the history of the page.--> |
| |nosupport=true
| |
| }} | | }} |
| ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== |
| | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} This article looks good at a first glance, but if one looks closer, some problems are visible. First is the rather informal writing style and inconsistent verb tenses. No, what concerns me the most is the ''Partners in Time'' section. That section is awfully short; it needs more details about the game and an overall expansion. Also, until we write an adequate section about his appearance in the ''Super Mario Kun'' manga, the article is incomplete, and that is enough for unfeaturing. |
|
| |
|
| ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== |
| #{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} I proof-read the article, corrected verb/informal tenses the most I can, wrote the Pitty story where Baby Luigi is involved in (which is basically the entire thing XP) though I could have created new errors, added the Super Mario Kun section, and added some information in other sections. I corrected most of the errors in the article that you mentioned, so this should stay featured.
| |
| #{{User|New Super Mario}} Per BLOF. This article looks great.
| |
| #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} BaboonLikesOliveFools has done everything I complained about. Now the article doesn't bother me as much anymore. I hate Baby Luigi.
| |
| #{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per ElderlyWaluigiOnWater.
| |
| #{{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} Per BLOF
| |
| #{{User|Mario Bros.!}} The article has no errors.
| |
| #{{User|Mario7727}} I think we should keep the article since there seems to be nothing wrong with it...
| |
| #{{User|Propeller Toad}} I agree with the others. The article is very clean, and informative with very few errors (also very accurate). This article should remain featured.
| |
| #{{User|Superfiremario}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Magikrazy51}} Way to go, BigLemonsOfFury. Per her.
| |
| #{{User|Doopliss42}}Whose idea was it to unfeature this article? It must be considered a hate crime against Baby Luigi. Per all above.
| |
| #{{User|BalloonBoolicious9090}}I think that this article shall be featured! People, let this article be featured in the future!
| |
| #{{User|GEX}} this article should be featured
| |
| #{{User|Chicken}} Baby Luigi awesome he should be featured his articale is fine i read it
| |
| #{{user|Garu500}} Everyone has made a good pint and I agree to all statements
| |
| #{{User|Catboy41}} per all.
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== |
|
| |
|
| ==== Comments ==== | | ==== Comments ==== |
| Uh-oh, you gave me work to do on this article. Time. I'll try fixing everything I can. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
| |
|
| |
| Just expand the informal contractions and I will be happy. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
| |
| :There's only, like, 2 nonquoted contractions in the entire article. Fix'd too. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
| |
|
| |
| ::Okay, don't vote to remove my vote. I will request for a deletion. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
| |
| :::You're not allowed to delete it yourself? {{User|Mario4Ever}}
| |
| ::::Well, I'm pretty sure I cannot delete pages. I can only blank them. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
| |
| :::::Oh, right. I forgot about this page and was just thinking of the unfeature template on the article. :/ {{User|Mario4Ever}}
| |
