Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 108: |
Line 108: |
| ::You're an admin? I can't find you in the list of admins or patroller. {{User:Booderdash/sig|.}} | | ::You're an admin? I can't find you in the list of admins or patroller. {{User:Booderdash/sig|.}} |
| :::So now only the admins can have hidden boards? I'm a member of the Poll Committee too you know. {{User|Marioguy1}} | | :::So now only the admins can have hidden boards? I'm a member of the Poll Committee too you know. {{User|Marioguy1}} |
| :::: I thought you were talking about the hidden staff board...0_0 so who are the commitee members anyways? {{User|Booderdash}}
| |
| There are tons of hidden boards for everything, 'shroom, polls, admins, mods, more. Anyways, SMB, St00b, GF, Edofenrir, SolarBlaze, me, Nerdy Guy and Black Hole Sun/My Bloody Valentine/Pokemon DP/whatever he's called now. {{User|Marioguy1}}
| |
| ::::: I thought Nerdy Guy and Black Hole Sun retired. {{User:Booderdash/sig|.}}
| |
| No, NG is a current MW forums administrator and MBV is a UP 'crat. {{User|Marioguy1}}
| |
|
| |
| == Bring this back! ==
| |
|
| |
| I say we bring this back! Who agrees?
| |
|
| |
| {{User:Electrical Bowser jr./sig}}
| |
| :Make a [[MarioWiki:Proposals|proposal]] about it. {{User:Master R.O.B/sig}} 10:28, 6 October 2012 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| You know my proposals are a disaster, right? Could you please do it?
| |
|
| |
| {{User:Electrical Bowser jr./sig}}
| |
|
| |
| I think we should talk to the staff before working this out with a Proposal because they were the ones who took it down.{{User:YoshiGo99/sig}} 15:27, 7 October 2012 (EDT)
| |
| :No we didn't a proposal did. {{User|Raven Effect}}
| |
|
| |
| I don't think we should bring it back, the main page looks nice and organize without it, plus a feature image section will cause a longer loading time. {{User|Zero777}}
| |
| :I don't think the images would cause that much of a server lag. {{User:BabyLuigiOnFire/sig}}
| |
| ::It's not only the image but the coding to create the new section. I think another reason why it was discontinued is because images were being recycled and the nominated ones were usually old video games because there are rarely new video game artwork. {{User|Zero777}}
| |
|
| |
| ==Featured Image Proposal==
| |
| {{settled TPP}}
| |
| {{proposal outcome|red|don't bring back 2-7}}
| |
| I think we should bring this back. I mean, we have featured ARTICLES, so why not featured IMAGES?
| |
|
| |
| '''Proposer''': {{User|LuigiBlubber}}<br>
| |
| '''Deadline''': October 24, 2012, 23:59 GMT
| |
|
| |
| ===Support===
| |
| #{{User|LuigiBlubber}}
| |
| #{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} Per LuigiBlubber.
| |
|
| |
| ===Oppose===
| |
| #{{User|Super Mario Bros.}} – This system did not work when it was in place, voting and rotating was a mess, and it caused more problems than it should have. The current Main Page would also be cramped if another box were added, and it would not look good. The current Main Page is fine as it is.
| |
| #{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} As much as I like this idea, without a good revamp of the system, the process would get taken down again. We have reasons for taking the FI down and our reasons were these: poor voting (since it's opinion-based, it is likely to be biased), cramped main page space, and the fact that, at the time, we were running out of FIs to feature. But the voting system is the main reason it was taken down. Also, per SMB.
| |
| #{{User|Lindsay151}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Zero777}} Per my replies above and all.
| |
| #{{User|Bop1996}} Per SMB.
| |
| #{{User|Raven Effect}} Per the proposal that got rid of them in the first place, also Per Bop 1996.
| |
| #{{User|Vommack}} Per all.
| |
|
| |
| ===Comments===
| |
| This is a pretty big change, so it should a full-on [[MarioWiki:Proposals|proposal]], not a TPP. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 18:24, 11 October 2012 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| Gee, I didn't know the Featured Images were so bad. I guess I shouldn't have started this. [[File:Marioart8.png|35px]][[User:LuigiBlubber|LuigiBlubber]][[File:Luigihattip.png|35px]]
| |
| :There's absolute no reason you should think you shouldn't have started this. But to bring this back, we need a serious overhaul of the system that made it moot in the first place. Since your proposal has no plans for any sort of changes, chances are, it will get taken down again just as quickly as last time. {{User:BabyLuigiOnFire/sig}}
| |
| :That just about sums it up. It's not that it's a bad proposal, it's just this sort of thing needs a different system to work-just think about it over the 4-week cooldown period, amend the system, and try it again.--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 12:49, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
| |