| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Is "sextuple" supposed to be there, or is it vandalism? {{User:Gonzales Kart Inc./sig}} | | Is "sextuple" supposed to be there, or is it vandalism? {{User:Gonzales Kart Inc./sig}} |
| :"Sextuple" is the correct way to say it. {{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 15:17, 7 June 2013 (EDT)
| |
| ::Oh, I always thought it was hextuple XD {{User:Gonzales Kart Inc./sig}}
| |
|
| |
| == More Images? ==
| |
|
| |
| Is that supposed to be there? I mean, there are seven pix already... {{User:Gonzales Kart Inc./sig}}
| |
|
| |
| ==Deletion==
| |
| {{settled TPP}}
| |
| {{Proposal outcome|red|don't delete 1-9}}
| |
| An article that repeats the same thing, but with different wording, ten times? I think not.
| |
|
| |
| '''Proposer''': {{User|RickTommy}}<br>
| |
| '''Deadline''': April 18, 2014, 23:59 GMT
| |
|
| |
| ===Support===
| |
| #{{User|RickTommy}}
| |
|
| |
| ===Oppose===
| |
| #{{User|Baby Luigi}} I wouldn't support a deletion towards a term that actually has meaning in Mario Golf (or just golf games in general) but I do support an overhaul of the article.
| |
| #{{User|Mario}} Just reduce the thing to a gallery of bogeys and describe the thing in one paragraph.
| |
| #{{User|Dashbot}} Certainly per above, followed by moving it to simply '''Bogey'''
| |
| #{{User|Vommack}} It definitely needs an overhaul, but as Baby Luigi stated, there's certainly a reason for this page to be here.
| |
| #{{User|Tails777}} Per Baby Luigi and Mario. The term is a bit more important, but I've always found that listing all the bogey types to be unnecessary.
| |
| #{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} Per All.
| |
| #{{User|Koopinator}} per Mario
| |
| #{{user|driftmaster130}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Walkazo}} - Per all, including the calls to move this page to plain "Bogey".
| |
|
| |
| ===Comments===
| |
| Although this article shouldn't be deleted, it does need an overhaul. As a mere suggestion:
| |
| * Move this page to "Bogey"
| |
| * Explain all of the terms, but without each one getting its own section
| |
| * Create a gallery displaying all of the images used in this article, plus new images of the types not shown? Otherwise, most of them should be deleted.
| |
| [[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 17:11, 5 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :I'll probably move these images to the respective character articles. After all, some of them can use some in-game images of their priceless expressions. {{User:Mario/sig}} 17:37, 5 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::I support the idea of making a gallery of all the different numbers {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 17:45, 5 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::Funny as it is, I think it's kind of pointless. {{User:Mario/sig}} 13:37, 6 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| Yeah, let's move the thing to [[Bogey]], Dashdardery and Walkz. {{User:Mario/sig}} 22:00, 13 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :A list of Bogeys? Considering that a there isn't such thing as anything over a quadruple bogey (or at least I think there isn't) and that you can get +11s on par 5s, I think this page should be moved to bogey, but excluding the +5, +6 etc, because they aren't actually bogeys. I don't know we're to vote because the goal isn't clear enough to me. - {{User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 00:45, 16 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::We're just preventing the deletion of the page. +x scores are ''technically'' bogeys, but they're just a cleaner way to say it than stuff like "sextuple bogey" or "decuple bogey". {{User:Mario/sig}} 16:32, 17 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::Depends. Golfers in real life wouldn't ''really'' use those therms, but they would defiantly say 'Triple' Bogey'. Anyway, I think I'm against deletion, with the move to [[Bogey]]. Do I actually even have authority to do that? - {{User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 17:37, 17 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ==Move to {{fake link|Bogey}}==
| |
| {{Settled TPP}}
| |
| {{Proposal outcome|green|accepted 8-0}}
| |
| As per the discussion in the last proposal.
| |
|
| |
| '''Proposer''': {{User|Vommack}}<br>
| |
| '''Deadline''': May 2, 2014, 23:59 GMT
| |
|
| |
| ===Support===
| |
| #{{User|Vommack}} Proposal.
| |
| #{{User|Ninelevendo}} Look at me comments in last proposal.
| |
| #{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per proposal
| |
| #{{User|Mario}} Just move the damn thing.
| |
| #{{User|Mr. Ice Bro.}} Per proposal.
| |
| #{{User|Koopakoolklub}} Of ''course'' the bogey types should be on the bogey page!
| |
| #{{User|Yoshi876}} - Per proposal.
| |
| #{{User|Walkazo}} - It could've just been moved, but oh well, per this proposal and the previous proposal.
| |
|
| |
| ===Oppose===
| |
|
| |
| ===Comments===
| |
| The page could've just been moved. Unless a change is major and/or likely to be contested, TPPs generally aren't a necessity. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 21:22, 18 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :I ''did'' ask if I has authority to do that. - {{User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 21:27, 18 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::I want to skip the whole proposal process and just get right into the moving part. {{User:Mario/sig}} 12:12, 19 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::I can't believe we are wastin two months with out any purpose. Support--{{User:Dashbot/sig}} 08:57, 21 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::::Seriously, I'm not waiting until [[Mario Golf: World Tour]] comes out for us to fix this. Considering this is ''in'' the ''Mario Golf World Tour'' page, we need this fixed up ASAP. '''''WHY CAN'T WE JUST MOVE THE DAMN THING!''''' - {{User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 18:11, 21 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::::There is no reason that the types of bogeys should be separate from the '''page that talks about bogeys.''' Really? Come on. {{User:Koopakoolklub/sig}} 09:37, 26 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::We mean ''move'', not ''split''. - {{User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 17:23, 26 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
