Editing Talk:Dragon Wario (Wario Land: Super Mario Land 3)
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::::::::I don't think it's really worth a proposal since it's just a small change on the very bottom of each page. I still object to "creature" because even though it isn't wrong, I think it is awkward to call individual people "creatures"(I know I wouldn't like being called a "creature!")Same with Fire Mario and Fire Luigi--those are just forms, not separate entities or creatures from regular old Mario and Luigi. Don't care enough to fight for it, really. Having templates-categories has always bugged me on this site, especially when they have the same exact things on both. I don't think that we need templates aside form things like "power-ups", "bosses", or other important material. Just my two cents. {{User:Goomb-omb/sig}} | ::::::::I don't think it's really worth a proposal since it's just a small change on the very bottom of each page. I still object to "creature" because even though it isn't wrong, I think it is awkward to call individual people "creatures"(I know I wouldn't like being called a "creature!")Same with Fire Mario and Fire Luigi--those are just forms, not separate entities or creatures from regular old Mario and Luigi. Don't care enough to fight for it, really. Having templates-categories has always bugged me on this site, especially when they have the same exact things on both. I don't think that we need templates aside form things like "power-ups", "bosses", or other important material. Just my two cents. {{User:Goomb-omb/sig}} | ||
Well, while I do think some templates that I've made are a bit ridiculous, and plan to soon rid the wiki of them as long as there are no objections ({{fake link|Template:Magic}} {{fake link|Template:Volcano}}), I do think that the templates on this page should stay. I have used the fire template (as well as the dragon one) several times to travel from article to article and compare information. It's easier than waiting for another page to load and then find what you're looking for. I think with certain templates being redesigned to look somewhat like [[Template:MK | Well, while I do think some templates that I've made are a bit ridiculous, and plan to soon rid the wiki of them as long as there are no objections ({{fake link|Template:Magic}} {{fake link|Template:Volcano}}), I do think that the templates on this page should stay. I have used the fire template (as well as the dragon one) several times to travel from article to article and compare information. It's easier than waiting for another page to load and then find what you're looking for. I think with certain templates being redesigned to look somewhat like [[Template:MK Race Courses|this]], they'd be much more appeasing to people. I have two big opinions on this matter. | ||
*'''1)''' All navigation templates should be collapsible completely. This means all the way down to one row. Then, said templates should be reorganized in an easy to navigate manner, be it by alphabetizing it's contents, or by grouping them together ''and'' alphabetizing them. (That's my favorite way to do it, as you can see with many of my later templates.) By doing so, navigation templates take up exactly the same amount of space, but can be enlarged with the click of a button to find exactly what you're looking for. | *'''1)''' All navigation templates should be collapsible completely. This means all the way down to one row. Then, said templates should be reorganized in an easy to navigate manner, be it by alphabetizing it's contents, or by grouping them together ''and'' alphabetizing them. (That's my favorite way to do it, as you can see with many of my later templates.) By doing so, navigation templates take up exactly the same amount of space, but can be enlarged with the click of a button to find exactly what you're looking for. | ||
*'''2)''' All navigation templates should refer to any one of the following: | *'''2)''' All navigation templates should refer to any one of the following: | ||
**Game-specific templates — when making a template based on '''one''' game, you should break it down into four main sections: Locations, Items, Enemies, and Bosses. Other sections can be added if necessary. (Examples are {{tem|SM64}}, {{tem|SMB2}}, and {{tem|Super Mario Bros.}}.) | **Game-specific templates — when making a template based on '''one''' game, you should break it down into four main sections: Locations, Items, Enemies, and Bosses. Other sections can be added if necessary. (Examples are {{tem|SM64}}, {{tem|SMB2}}, and {{tem|Super Mario Bros.}}.) | ||
**Series-specific templates — this should mainly be used to target an entire series of games with one common feature. This one feature would be broken down into its appearance within each game in the series. (Examples are {{tem|MK | **Series-specific templates — this should mainly be used to target an entire series of games with one common feature. This one feature would be broken down into its appearance within each game in the series. (Examples are {{tem|MK Race Courses}}, {{tem|MP}}, and {{fake link|Template:Boss}}.) | ||
**Species-specific templates — this should only be used with enemies with a large amount of species, as well as a reasonable amount of characters based on said species. (Examples are {{tem|Goomba}}, {{tem|Hammer Bros.}}, and {{fake link|Template:Fire}}, and even {{fake link|Template:Dragons}}.) | **Species-specific templates — this should only be used with enemies with a large amount of species, as well as a reasonable amount of characters based on said species. (Examples are {{tem|Goomba}}, {{tem|Hammer Bros.}}, and {{fake link|Template:Fire}}, and even {{fake link|Template:Dragons}}.) | ||
So, having said that, I strongly support keeping the templates that are on this article. I have actually been thinking of starting a proposal that would enforce rules like these on navigation templates, so that the current mess we have on some articles could be completely rid of. I would need the help of others though to actually tackle the feat of setting those rules in to all templates though; that's why I've yet to actually mention it until now. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 06:45, 5 December 2008 (EST) | So, having said that, I strongly support keeping the templates that are on this article. I have actually been thinking of starting a proposal that would enforce rules like these on navigation templates, so that the current mess we have on some articles could be completely rid of. I would need the help of others though to actually tackle the feat of setting those rules in to all templates though; that's why I've yet to actually mention it until now. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 06:45, 5 December 2008 (EST) |