Editing Talk:Super Mario Odyssey
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 814: | Line 814: | ||
We have to address this issue sooner or later, might as well be sooner. | We have to address this issue sooner or later, might as well be sooner. | ||
The ''Super Mario Odyssey'' [[Template: | The ''Super Mario Odyssey'' [[:Template:Kingdom|kingdoms template]] currently lists every single checkpoint in the game, with links (mostly red) to each and every one of them, as if to suggest we should actually create articles for all of them. We should ''not''. Do we have articles for every Power Moon? No. Do we have articles for every [[List of treasures in Wario: Master of Disguise|treasure]] in ''Wario: Master of Disguise''? No. Should we give articles to every single solitary checkpoint in ''Super Mario Odyssey'' just because they have a name? No, no, a thousand times ''no''. We don't split Windswept Valley from [[Tiny-Huge Island]], nor do we split Hoohoo Mountain Base from [[Hoohoo Mountain]]. Something must be done. | ||
There was a [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/51#Do_not_create_Super_Mario_Odyssey_sublocation_pages|proposal]] about this last year which the proposer ended up canceling. The problem with this proposal was that it wasn't clear enough about exactly which locations should get articles and which shouldn't. So I went over them and organized them into groups: what we should keep, what we ''might'' want to keep, and what we should get rid of. | There was a [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/51#Do_not_create_Super_Mario_Odyssey_sublocation_pages|proposal]] about this last year which the proposer ended up canceling. The problem with this proposal was that it wasn't clear enough about exactly which locations should get articles and which shouldn't. So I went over them and organized them into groups: what we should keep, what we ''might'' want to keep, and what we should get rid of. | ||
Line 839: | Line 839: | ||
:EDIT: This was last year, lol. I'll do it anyway though. [[User:4e696e6a6f795844|4e696e6a6f795844]] ([[User talk:4e696e6a6f795844|talk]]) 22:22, March 10, 2020 (EDT) | :EDIT: This was last year, lol. I'll do it anyway though. [[User:4e696e6a6f795844|4e696e6a6f795844]] ([[User talk:4e696e6a6f795844|talk]]) 22:22, March 10, 2020 (EDT) | ||
::Should wait for a consensus first. I'm not sure what has and hasn't been done yet, though. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 22:25, March 10, 2020 (EDT) | ::Should wait for a consensus first. I'm not sure what has and hasn't been done yet, though. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 22:25, March 10, 2020 (EDT) | ||
:::@Alex95: You can see how much is done by looking at the [[Template: | :::@Alex95: You can see how much is done by looking at the [[:Template:Kingdom|kingdoms template]]. As mentioned, about half of them have been made. | ||
:::@4e696e6a6f795844: I don't see the point in waiting to create a bunch of articles that are just going to be deleted. It will be a waste of time and effort, and I've already been waiting a ''year'' for this. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 21:22, May 10, 2020 (EDT) | :::@4e696e6a6f795844: I don't see the point in waiting to create a bunch of articles that are just going to be deleted. It will be a waste of time and effort, and I've already been waiting a ''year'' for this. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 21:22, May 10, 2020 (EDT) | ||