Editing Talk:Wario's Woods
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
::[[Challenge Mode (New Super Mario Bros.)]] - We have a complication. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 01:56, 8 July 2016 (EDT) | ::[[Challenge Mode (New Super Mario Bros.)]] - We have a complication. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 01:56, 8 July 2016 (EDT) | ||
==Split?== | == Split? == | ||
{{talk}} | |||
[[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 52#Split Switch.2F3DS ports with substantial new content|Given this proposal,]] I'd say the SNES ''Wario's Woods'' is more than transformative enough to qualify for a split. In addition to adding the VS COM and extra difficulty, the existing Round Game and Time Race game modes have significant changes between consoles as well, with entirely different monster layouts per screen, soundtrack, and the removal of standard bosses. It's somewhat forcing it to keep them in the same article. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 10:25, October 20, 2019 (EDT) | [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 52#Split Switch.2F3DS ports with substantial new content|Given this proposal,]] I'd say the SNES ''Wario's Woods'' is more than transformative enough to qualify for a split. In addition to adding the VS COM and extra difficulty, the existing Round Game and Time Race game modes have significant changes between consoles as well, with entirely different monster layouts per screen, soundtrack, and the removal of standard bosses. It's somewhat forcing it to keep them in the same article. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 10:25, October 20, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:It's been almost a year since this was initially suggested, but I agree with splitting. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 18:36, October 11, 2020 (EDT) | :It's been almost a year since this was initially suggested, but I agree with splitting. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 18:36, October 11, 2020 (EDT) | ||
Line 69: | Line 71: | ||
== Split Wario's Woods. == | == Split Wario's Woods. == | ||
{{ | {{TPP}} | ||
I know that I made a port/remake proposal before, but this one's different. First, some context. On July 18, 2018,[[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/52#Split_Switch.2F3DS_ports_with_substantial_new_content|a proposal]] to split Switch/3DS games on a case by case basis passed. On October 20, 2019, {{User|LinkTheLefty}} said | I know that I made a port/remake proposal before, but this one's different. First, some context. On July 18, 2018,[[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/52#Split_Switch.2F3DS_ports_with_substantial_new_content|a proposal]] to split Switch/3DS games on a case by case basis passed. On October 20, 2019, {{User|LinkTheLefty}} said | ||
<blockquote>[[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 52#Split Switch.2F3DS ports with substantial new content|Given this proposal,]] I'd say the SNES ''Wario's Woods'' is more than transformative enough to qualify for a split. In addition to adding the VS COM and extra difficulty, the existing Round Game and Time Race game modes have significant changes between consoles as well, with entirely different monster layouts per screen, soundtrack, and the removal of standard bosses. It's somewhat forcing it to keep them in the same article. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 10:25, October 20, 2019 (EDT)</blockquote> | <blockquote>[[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 52#Split Switch.2F3DS ports with substantial new content|Given this proposal,]] I'd say the SNES ''Wario's Woods'' is more than transformative enough to qualify for a split. In addition to adding the VS COM and extra difficulty, the existing Round Game and Time Race game modes have significant changes between consoles as well, with entirely different monster layouts per screen, soundtrack, and the removal of standard bosses. It's somewhat forcing it to keep them in the same article. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 10:25, October 20, 2019 (EDT)</blockquote> | ||
Line 88: | Line 89: | ||
#{{User|Waluigi Time}} Long overdue. We don't have much information on the Satellaview versions though, so those can probably stay merged for now. | #{{User|Waluigi Time}} Long overdue. We don't have much information on the Satellaview versions though, so those can probably stay merged for now. | ||
#{{User|Camwoodstock}} Per Waluigi Time--how has this not been done ''sooner?'' While we'd like to split the Satellaview version at a later time, we figure it can't hurt to keep them merged until those are more documented. | #{{User|Camwoodstock}} Per Waluigi Time--how has this not been done ''sooner?'' While we'd like to split the Satellaview version at a later time, we figure it can't hurt to keep them merged until those are more documented. | ||
===Split all 3=== | ===Split all 3=== | ||
Line 102: | Line 97: | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||