Editing User talk:Trig Jegman

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search

This user is currently blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
{{block|reason=being a member of a radical hate community, where the user made questionable posts}}
==Disclaimers and Notices==
==Disclaimers and Notices==
Archive list:
Archive list:
Line 114: Line 113:
===Proposal clarification===
===Proposal clarification===
----
----
You made several mistakes when you archived recently-completed proposals. First, you passed a proposal with only three votes. Per the proposal page, "Any proposal that has three votes or less at deadline will automatically be listed as "NO QUORUM." The original proposer then has the option to relist said proposal to generate more discussion." Second, you marked a proposal which won as one which had no quorum. However, the proposal had more than three votes, and the rules that say that a proposal must be extended if no option wins by at least three votes, or that the winning option must win by the majority else it gets extended, only apply to proposals with both two options and more than ten votes, or proposals with more than two options, respectively. The proposal  doesn't meet the criteria for these rules, and thus it won. Third, you marked a proposal with no quorum when it should have continued. The proposal applied to the rule of needing a majority due to having more than two options, and it had more than three votes, thus it should have continued. Finally, when archiving proposals, you should use the {{tem|Proposal outcome}} template on the proposal's talk page, or on the page they're archived on like [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 55|here]]. {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 09:48, February 27, 2020 (EST)
You made several mistakes when you archived recently-completed proposals. First, you passed a proposal with only three votes. Per the proposal page, "Any proposal that has three votes or less at deadline will automatically be listed as "NO QUORUM." The original proposer then has the option to relist said proposal to generate more discussion." Second, you marked a proposal which won as one which had no quorum. However, the proposal had more than three votes, and the rules that say that a proposal must be extended if no option wins by at least three votes, or that the winning option must win by the majority else it gets extended, only apply to proposals with both two options and more than ten votes, or proposals with more than two options, respectively. The proposal  doesn't meet the criteria for these rules, and thus it won. Third, you marked a proposal with no quorum when it should have continued. The proposal applied to the rule of needing a majority due to having more than two options, and it had more than three votes, thus it should have continued. Finally, when archiving proposals, you should use the {{tem|ProposalOutcome}} template on the proposal's talk page, or on the page they're archived on like [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 55|here]]. {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 09:48, February 27, 2020 (EST)
::My apologies on that. I'll take responsibility on the Shy Guy, but I was not sure how to classify the won as no quorum because of the duplicate votes in place. Because I could not really determine what won per se (even with looking at the rules), I assumed it was no quorum. As for the third, I don't know what you man for the placement of that template. [[User:Trig Jegman|Trig]] - 09:57, February 27, 2020 (EST)
::My apologies on that. I'll take responsibility on the Shy Guy, but I was not sure how to classify the won as no quorum because of the duplicate votes in place. Because I could not really determine what won per se (even with looking at the rules), I assumed it was no quorum. As for the third, I don't know what you man for the placement of that template. [[User:Trig Jegman|Trig]] - 09:57, February 27, 2020 (EST)
:::I made a mistake with the regular Bowser Stature proposal. I was counting the duplicate votes as well when it came to the majority wins rules, so the proposal won instead of continuing or being no quorum, so sorry about that. Though what I said about the Black Shy Guy and Gold Bowser Statue proposals still pertain. Anyways, for the template, you just need to place it under the {{tem|Settled TPP}} template. Like this:
:::I made a mistake with the regular Bowser Stature proposal. I was counting the duplicate votes as well when it came to the majority wins rules, so the proposal won instead of continuing or being no quorum, so sorry about that. Though what I said about the Black Shy Guy and Gold Bowser Statue proposals still pertain. Anyways, for the template, you just need to place it under the {{tem|SettledTPP}} template. Like this:
Header
Header


{{tem|Settled TPP}}
{{tem|SettledTPP}}


<nowiki>{{Proposal outcome|passed/failed/vetoed/canceled/no consensus/no quorum|votes (if necessary)|argument}}</nowiki>
<nowiki>{{ProposalOutcome|passed/failed/vetoed/canceled/no consensus/no quorum|votes (if necessary)|argument}}</nowiki>


(The rest of the proposal itself)
(The rest of the proposal itself)


The [[Template:Proposal outcome]] gives more clear instructions (and is where I took the example for the template). I hope this makes it more clear. {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 12:43, February 27, 2020 (EST)
The [[Template:ProposalOutcome]] gives more clear instructions (and is where I took the example for the template). I hope this makes it more clear. {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 12:43, February 27, 2020 (EST)


== Image help ==
== Image help ==
Line 182: Line 181:


<s>After you're done for the day, I strongly suggest you check [[:Category:Articles with broken file links]] next time to make sure you haven't missed anything. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 07:56, March 16, 2020 (EDT)</s>
<s>After you're done for the day, I strongly suggest you check [[:Category:Articles with broken file links]] next time to make sure you haven't missed anything. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 07:56, March 16, 2020 (EDT)</s>
==???==
How did you guys know that he was part of a radical hate community? Which one is it? {{User:OhoJeeOnFire/sig}}
:The details of this are best kept within the wiki staff. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 12:20, November 18, 2021 (EST)
::Oh. No wonder. This “community” is a very bad place, isn’t it? {{User:OhoJeeOnFire/sig}}

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)