Editing User talk:Trig Jegman
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Disclaimers and Notices== | ==Disclaimers and Notices== | ||
Archive list: | Archive list: | ||
Line 114: | Line 113: | ||
===Proposal clarification=== | ===Proposal clarification=== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
You made several mistakes when you archived recently-completed proposals. First, you passed a proposal with only three votes. Per the proposal page, "Any proposal that has three votes or less at deadline will automatically be listed as "NO QUORUM." The original proposer then has the option to relist said proposal to generate more discussion." Second, you marked a proposal which won as one which had no quorum. However, the proposal had more than three votes, and the rules that say that a proposal must be extended if no option wins by at least three votes, or that the winning option must win by the majority else it gets extended, only apply to proposals with both two options and more than ten votes, or proposals with more than two options, respectively. The proposal doesn't meet the criteria for these rules, and thus it won. Third, you marked a proposal with no quorum when it should have continued. The proposal applied to the rule of needing a majority due to having more than two options, and it had more than three votes, thus it should have continued. Finally, when archiving proposals, you should use the {{tem| | You made several mistakes when you archived recently-completed proposals. First, you passed a proposal with only three votes. Per the proposal page, "Any proposal that has three votes or less at deadline will automatically be listed as "NO QUORUM." The original proposer then has the option to relist said proposal to generate more discussion." Second, you marked a proposal which won as one which had no quorum. However, the proposal had more than three votes, and the rules that say that a proposal must be extended if no option wins by at least three votes, or that the winning option must win by the majority else it gets extended, only apply to proposals with both two options and more than ten votes, or proposals with more than two options, respectively. The proposal doesn't meet the criteria for these rules, and thus it won. Third, you marked a proposal with no quorum when it should have continued. The proposal applied to the rule of needing a majority due to having more than two options, and it had more than three votes, thus it should have continued. Finally, when archiving proposals, you should use the {{tem|ProposalOutcome}} template on the proposal's talk page, or on the page they're archived on like [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 55|here]]. {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 09:48, February 27, 2020 (EST) | ||
::My apologies on that. I'll take responsibility on the Shy Guy, but I was not sure how to classify the won as no quorum because of the duplicate votes in place. Because I could not really determine what won per se (even with looking at the rules), I assumed it was no quorum. As for the third, I don't know what you man for the placement of that template. [[User:Trig Jegman|Trig]] - 09:57, February 27, 2020 (EST) | ::My apologies on that. I'll take responsibility on the Shy Guy, but I was not sure how to classify the won as no quorum because of the duplicate votes in place. Because I could not really determine what won per se (even with looking at the rules), I assumed it was no quorum. As for the third, I don't know what you man for the placement of that template. [[User:Trig Jegman|Trig]] - 09:57, February 27, 2020 (EST) | ||
:::I made a mistake with the regular Bowser Stature proposal. I was counting the duplicate votes as well when it came to the majority wins rules, so the proposal won instead of continuing or being no quorum, so sorry about that. Though what I said about the Black Shy Guy and Gold Bowser Statue proposals still pertain. Anyways, for the template, you just need to place it under the {{tem| | :::I made a mistake with the regular Bowser Stature proposal. I was counting the duplicate votes as well when it came to the majority wins rules, so the proposal won instead of continuing or being no quorum, so sorry about that. Though what I said about the Black Shy Guy and Gold Bowser Statue proposals still pertain. Anyways, for the template, you just need to place it under the {{tem|SettledTPP}} template. Like this: | ||
Header | Header | ||
{{tem| | {{tem|SettledTPP}} | ||
<nowiki>{{ | <nowiki>{{ProposalOutcome|passed/failed/vetoed/canceled/no consensus/no quorum|votes (if necessary)|argument}}</nowiki> | ||
(The rest of the proposal itself) | (The rest of the proposal itself) | ||
The [[Template: | The [[Template:ProposalOutcome]] gives more clear instructions (and is where I took the example for the template). I hope this makes it more clear. {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 12:43, February 27, 2020 (EST) | ||
== Image help == | == Image help == | ||
Line 182: | Line 181: | ||
<s>After you're done for the day, I strongly suggest you check [[:Category:Articles with broken file links]] next time to make sure you haven't missed anything. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 07:56, March 16, 2020 (EDT)</s> | <s>After you're done for the day, I strongly suggest you check [[:Category:Articles with broken file links]] next time to make sure you haven't missed anything. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 07:56, March 16, 2020 (EDT)</s> | ||