MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Baby Donkey Kong: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Time Turner (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__ ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== {{UNFANOMSTAT |nominated=~~~~~ |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth supp...") |
Time Turner (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|GreenDisaster}} I've looked over the original nomination for this article, and while I do agree that the article's in good shape, it overlooked one detail: the article is short. Yes, there's information on all of his appearances and his general information. Yes, there are a reasonable amount of images and no broken links. Yes, it doesn't have any improvement tags and is written in an unbiased matter. However, all of that does not change one fact: the article is short. Unless you decide to pad it with redundant or unnecessary details, that fact is not going to change. Heck, he's not even in the [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Special:LongPages&limit=500&offset=1000 top 1000] of the longest articles. I cannot find a single featured article that is nearly as short as this one. If we're arguing against featuring [[Shigeru Miyamoto]] because of the shortness of | #{{User|GreenDisaster}} I've looked over the original nomination for this article, and while I do agree that the article's in good shape, it overlooked one detail: the article is short. Yes, there's information on all of his appearances and his general information. Yes, there are a reasonable amount of images and no broken links. Yes, it doesn't have any improvement tags and is written in an unbiased matter. However, all of that does not change one fact: the article is short. Unless you decide to pad it with redundant or unnecessary details, that fact is not going to change. Heck, he's not even in the [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Special:LongPages&limit=500&offset=1000 top 1000] of the longest articles. I cannot find a single featured article that is nearly as short as this one. If we're arguing against featuring [[Shigeru Miyamoto]] because of the shortness of that article, why should this article remain featured when it's similarly short? | ||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
Revision as of 08:14, February 18, 2013
Baby Donkey Kong
Remove Featured Article Status
- GreenDisaster (talk) I've looked over the original nomination for this article, and while I do agree that the article's in good shape, it overlooked one detail: the article is short. Yes, there's information on all of his appearances and his general information. Yes, there are a reasonable amount of images and no broken links. Yes, it doesn't have any improvement tags and is written in an unbiased matter. However, all of that does not change one fact: the article is short. Unless you decide to pad it with redundant or unnecessary details, that fact is not going to change. Heck, he's not even in the top 1000 of the longest articles. I cannot find a single featured article that is nearly as short as this one. If we're arguing against featuring Shigeru Miyamoto because of the shortness of that article, why should this article remain featured when it's similarly short?
