MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Kiddy Kong: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:The talk page isn't that great either. Mainly because the image is very big. {{User:Yoshi the Space Station Manager/sig}} 19:22, 31 December 2016 (EST) | :The talk page isn't that great either. Mainly because the image is very big. {{User:Yoshi the Space Station Manager/sig}} 19:22, 31 December 2016 (EST) | ||
::Talk pages have next to no bearing on the status of the featured article {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 19:24, 31 December 2016 (EST) | ::Talk pages have next to no bearing on the status of the featured article {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 19:24, 31 December 2016 (EST) | ||
:::I know. But, it needs to be done too. {{User:Yoshi the Space Station Manager/sig}} 19:27, 31 December 2016 (EST) |
Revision as of 19:27, December 31, 2016
Kiddy Kong
Remove featured article status
- Yoshi the Space Station Manager (talk) Back in 2011, this page was put up to be unfeatured. It failed, but now I think it is time to have it unfeatured. I found this article while looking at the upcoming FA. I went to look at it, and found that it has a rewrite template on it. This was put on by a patroller who knows that feature articles aren't suppose to have these marks. It has been since August of this year since the rewrite has been placed. There may be more to this article that falls under FA requirements, but this is extremely noticeable. Summary: This can't be a FA according to the one of the rules.
- Alex95 (talk) Per rule
Keep featured article status
- Baby Luigi (talk) The length is a point of contention, but otherwise I have fixed the writing problems that not only were specific to the rewrite template, but to the entire article. I say unless there's more discussion regarding the length, we keep this article featured.
Removal of support/oppose votes
Comments
Any reason that said patroller put it up? Ray Trace(T|C) 16:00, 24 December 2016 (EST)
- Yoshi876 (talk) was the one to include it, though no specific reason was given. 16:03, 24 December 2016 (EST)
I've discovered that the section rewrite template isn't enough. The entire article is poorly written. Ray Trace(T|C) 22:34, 29 December 2016 (EST)
- The talk page isn't that great either. Mainly because the image is very big. Yoshi the SSM (talk) 19:22, 31 December 2016 (EST)
- Talk pages have next to no bearing on the status of the featured article Ray Trace(T|C) 19:24, 31 December 2016 (EST)
- I know. But, it needs to be done too. Yoshi the SSM (talk) 19:27, 31 December 2016 (EST)
- Talk pages have next to no bearing on the status of the featured article Ray Trace(T|C) 19:24, 31 December 2016 (EST)