MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Paper Mario/Bestiary: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Comments: I know it's redundant, but the placement of the "/" in the title is complicating the template's functionality.)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
{{FANOMFAIL
|nominated=22:41, 20 June 2011
|nominated=22:41, 20 June 2011
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=18:42, 6 November 2011
|nosupport=true
}}
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
Line 11: Line 12:
#{{User|Superfiremario}}
#{{User|Superfiremario}}
#{{User|Mario Bros.!}}
#{{User|Mario Bros.!}}
#{{User|Reddragon19k}}
#{{User|Technickal}}


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
Line 31: Line 32:
::No, I see a difference now between the GIFs and the PNGs. The Ice King and Bowser sprites do not look very good. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
::No, I see a difference now between the GIFs and the PNGs. The Ice King and Bowser sprites do not look very good. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
:::The inconsistent file extension isn't the only issue; some sprites are bigger than their actual size (yes, I'm looking at you, The Master) {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
:::The inconsistent file extension isn't the only issue; some sprites are bigger than their actual size (yes, I'm looking at you, The Master) {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
[[Category:FA failure archives|Paper Mario]]

Latest revision as of 15:58, February 9, 2017

Paper Mario/Bestiary[edit]

Support[edit]

  1. Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) i feel this is a very good article it's a complete list of enemies and there tatles, it has an image of every enemy and it's since it's the info is taken from the game itself it must be in the proper tense.
  2. YoshiGo99 (talk)
  3. New Super Yoshi (talk)
  4. Superfiremario (talk)
  5. Mario Bros.! (talk)
  6. Technickal (talk)

Oppose[edit]

  1. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Some of these images are gifs, which make them appear very bad in comparison with the pngs. And they need to be consistent. Most, if not all, need to face the right. Also, some are resized. Bad too.
  2. LeftyGreenMario (talk) The images need to be consistent in everything: the way they face and the format the images are in.
  3. Supremo78 (talk) Per BLOF.
  4. UltraMario3000 (talk) Per BLOF.

Removal of Opposes[edit]

Comments[edit]

Hmm...I can't decide on this one. I kind of support what BLOF said, some need better images. But it is complete. If the images are fixed I'll support. PyroGuy6 (talk)

Per PyroGuy. New Super Mario (talk)
There's nothing in the FA standards that pertains to image consistency in terms of format. Maybe it's just me, but I don't think that the difference between the pngs and gifs is notable enough to detract from the quality of the article as a whole. Mario4Ever (talk)

Well, I don't think the rules cover every single bit of articles. In MarioWiki, it seems, many people strive for consistency as much as possible. Besides, there IS a difference between PNGs and GIFs. PNGs are super-precise pictures. GIFs are precise, but there can be only 256 colors, but it can be animated. However, my main concern of the article is how the sprites look. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

I know there's a difference, but in this instance, I don't find it notable. I do agree, however, that as far as the sprites go, some can look better. Mario4Ever (talk)
No, I see a difference now between the GIFs and the PNGs. The Ice King and Bowser sprites do not look very good. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
The inconsistent file extension isn't the only issue; some sprites are bigger than their actual size (yes, I'm looking at you, The Master) BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)