Talk:Tileoid: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "([Pp]roposal|[Ss]ettled)(Outcome|TPP)" to "$1 $2") |
|||
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should this article be deleted? It describes a purely hypothetical parent species, and I know we've deleted those in the past (though I can't think of any specific examples at the moment). --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 20:44, March 30, 2021 (EDT) | Should this article be deleted? It describes a purely hypothetical parent species, and I know we've deleted those in the past (though I can't think of any specific examples at the moment). --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 20:44, March 30, 2021 (EDT) | ||
:Another article like this is the [[Finley]] article. I think at best these articles could be converted into disambiguation pages. {{User:Keyblade Master/sig}} 20:53, March 30, 2021 (EDT) | :Another article like this is the [[Finley]] article. I think at best these articles could be converted into disambiguation pages. {{User:Keyblade Master/sig}} 20:53, March 30, 2021 (EDT) | ||
Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
== What to do with this article == | == What to do with this article == | ||
{{Settled TPP}} | |||
{{ | {{Proposal outcome|passed|1-9-0|Turn the article into a disambiguation page}} | ||
See comments above. While there's indeed no point in having an article on a hypothetical parent species, this one is unique in that no one member can easily be considered the obvious parent species. (You could argue that it would be [[Tileoid G]], but that's still a bit of a stretch.) So then, what should we do with this article? | See comments above. While there's indeed no point in having an article on a hypothetical parent species, this one is unique in that no one member can easily be considered the obvious parent species. (You could argue that it would be [[Tileoid G]], but that's still a bit of a stretch.) So then, what should we do with this article? | ||
Line 21: | Line 20: | ||
#{{User|Keyblade Master}} As I said above. | #{{User|Keyblade Master}} As I said above. | ||
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all. | #{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|Hewer}} Per Alex95. | |||
#{{User|Niiue}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|RHG1951}} [[Magiblot]] is already like this. | |||
#{{User|BigBowserBoss}} Disambiguate with all the different Tileoid colours. | |||
===Keep as is=== | ===Keep as is=== | ||
Line 26: | Line 29: | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Should the same thing happen for [[Finley]] as well? {{User:Keyblade Master/sig}} 21:16, March 30, 2021 (EDT) | Should the same thing happen for [[Finley]] as well? {{User:Keyblade Master/sig}} 21:16, March 30, 2021 (EDT) | ||
:Not really, since in that case [[Blue Finley]]s are clearly meant to be the parent species, seeing as how [[Red Finley]]s are slightly less common, and [[Green Finley]]s are rather rare. {{User:Archivist Toadette/sig}} 21:21, March 30, 2021 (EDT) | |||
::I don't know if I'd count that as sufficient proof that one variant is meant to be the parent species, though. {{User:Niiue/sig}} 23:59, April 6, 2021 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 15:29, May 31, 2024
Should this article be deleted? It describes a purely hypothetical parent species, and I know we've deleted those in the past (though I can't think of any specific examples at the moment). -- Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 20:44, March 30, 2021 (EDT)
- Another article like this is the Finley article. I think at best these articles could be converted into disambiguation pages. Nightwicked Bowser 20:53, March 30, 2021 (EDT)
- Definitely delete. This is the exact same situation as Puff (species), and we all know how that went. Niiue - Who has lost his tail? 21:00, March 30, 2021 (EDT)
What to do with this article[edit]
This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal. |
Turn the article into a disambiguation page 1-9-0
See comments above. While there's indeed no point in having an article on a hypothetical parent species, this one is unique in that no one member can easily be considered the obvious parent species. (You could argue that it would be Tileoid G, but that's still a bit of a stretch.) So then, what should we do with this article?
Proposer: Archivist Toadette (talk)
Deadline: April 14, 2021, 23:59 GMT
Delete[edit]
- Archivist Toadette (talk) Second choice.
Convert to disambiguation page[edit]
- Archivist Toadette (talk) Preferred option.
- Waluigi Time (talk) Sure, why not.
- Alex95 (talk) - Kind of already a disambig anyway.
- Keyblade Master (talk) As I said above.
- TheFlameChomp (talk) Per all.
- Hewer (talk) Per Alex95.
- Niiue (talk) Per all.
- RHG1951 (talk) Magiblot is already like this.
- BigBowserBoss (talk) Disambiguate with all the different Tileoid colours.
Keep as is[edit]
Comments[edit]
Should the same thing happen for Finley as well? Nightwicked Bowser 21:16, March 30, 2021 (EDT)
- Not really, since in that case Blue Finleys are clearly meant to be the parent species, seeing as how Red Finleys are slightly less common, and Green Finleys are rather rare. (T|C) 21:21, March 30, 2021 (EDT)
- I don't know if I'd count that as sufficient proof that one variant is meant to be the parent species, though. Niiue - Who has lost his tail? 23:59, April 6, 2021 (EDT)