MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Waluigi: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
|||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FA archive notice}} | ||
'''Waluigi has became a featured article at 22:39, 19 March 2013''' | |||
===Support=== | ===Support=== | ||
| Line 12: | Line 10: | ||
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} | #{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} | ||
#{{User|Driver104}} | #{{User|Driver104}} | ||
#{{User|PotatTheSaiyan}} | |||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
Latest revision as of 17:42, May 31, 2024
Waluigi
This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Waluigi has became a featured article at 22:39, 19 March 2013
Support
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) Here's how the article got unfeatured. This article failed because of tense errors, biased writing, and not enough information. After a while, though, the silly writing and the tense errors are fixed, and so the improvement templates are gone. The article previously failed to mention some important in-game information (some sections simply describe what happened at the opening sequence of the game and that's it), but I expanded on that. Since the major problems are fixed, I think the article can be featured again.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
- Yoshi876 (talk)
- Electrical Bowser jr. (talk)
- Driver104 (talk)
- PotatTheSaiyan (talk)
Oppose
Removal of Opposes
Comments
The only thing that bothers me is the "Relationships with Other Characters" section, specifically, the Daisy one, because I feel the information is as speculation and inferences. I don't know if it should be rewritten or deleted. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- Fixed that BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
The bio section is a mess. It should be ordered just like the history section. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
- It should be better now. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
