MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Super Mario 64 DS: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Toadette the Achiever moved page MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N/Super Mario 64 DS to MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Super Mario 64 DS: One day overdue; nomination passed) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{fa-archive +{{FA archive notice)) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FA archive notice|unfeature=yes | ||
|nominated=02:24, 17 August 2018 (EDT) | |nominated=02:24, 17 August 2018 (EDT) | ||
|passed=19:36, 19 August 2018 (EDT) | |passed=19:36, 19 August 2018 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 17:47, May 31, 2024
Super Mario 64 DS
This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Super Mario 64 DS was nominated to be unfeatured at 02:24, 17 August 2018 (EDT) and passed at 18:36, 26 August 2018.
Remove featured article status
- Toadette the Achiever (talk) This article may be well-written on the surface, but it's lacking content-wise in several sections. For one, the VS mode section, while it does provide good detail about the mode, it lacks images for it. Another problem is the {{rewrite}} template found in the changes section, and for a good reason too: all of the changes listed are randomly ordered with no separate sections for graphical, quote, story, etc. Lastly, the reception section is the worst offender, largely because it has nothing but sales information. Yeah. There is literally nothing for critical reception other than "Super Mario 64 DS received positive reviews yada yada" plastered over absolutely nothing. At least the sales data is informative enough. There's not much else wrong with this article, but the critical reception is something very influential to the game that's utterly neglected here.
- WeirdDave13 (talk) Per Toadette the Achiever.
- YoshiEgg1990 (talk) The issues Toadette mentioned were fixed by me, with a little help. However, there are still issues. The Trivia section seems too long, File:SM64DS Vs Mode.png has {{image-quality}}, and the article is tagged with {{more media}}. Therefore, i am going to support this for now.
- Baby Luigi (talk) Per all. Standards for what constitutes as a featured article have increased and this article is a relic of that time period that desperately needs updating.
- TheFlameChomp (talk) Per all.
- Yoshi the SSM (talk) Shorten Trivia a bit so that it isn't appear as long. But, the other two issues remain, which I can't take care of even though I have the game.
Keep featured article status
Removal of support/oppose votes
Comments
For VS mode, afaik, melonDS is the only DS emulation that can potentially emulate multiplayer play. Otherwise, I think it's unfair tagging it for better image quality upload, because most emulators, including Desmume do not support multiplayer. Ray Trace(T|C) 19:41, 19 August 2018 (EDT)