Template talk:Wikipedia: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Yay! It works near perfectly! Thanks, Stooben! Just a question: I know with the original template you could link to a Wikipedia article with a different name and still have it show the proper name (ie Banjo instead of Banjo (Banjo-Kazooie)... it goes better with the template's grammer). You would write <nowiki>{{wikipedia|Banjo (Banjo-Kazooie)|Banjo}}</nowiki>. Do you suppose that when you were optimizing the template for the Mario Wiki, that feature got removed? I'm so sorry that I know nothing about templates... I feel so useless and irritating right now! {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 21:38, 11 November 2008 (EST) | Yay! It works near perfectly! Thanks, Stooben! Just a question: I know with the original template you could link to a Wikipedia article with a different name and still have it show the proper name (ie Banjo instead of Banjo (Banjo-Kazooie)... it goes better with the template's grammer). You would write <nowiki>{{wikipedia|Banjo (Banjo-Kazooie)|Banjo}}</nowiki>. Do you suppose that when you were optimizing the template for the Mario Wiki, that feature got removed? I'm so sorry that I know nothing about templates... I feel so useless and irritating right now! {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 21:38, 11 November 2008 (EST) | ||
:No problem! Yeah, I didn't realize that I took out the link renaming option until you mentioned it; sorry. I made a slight change, so now when you type <nowiki>{{wikipedia|Banjo (Banjo-Kazooie)|Banjo}}</nowiki>, it appears as <font color=skyblue>'''Banjo'''</font>. Thanks for the heads up. And don't feel useless; you actually came up with the idea of implementing the template here! Now that deserves some kudos. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 01:08, 12 November 2008 (EST) | :No problem! Yeah, I didn't realize that I took out the link renaming option until you mentioned it; sorry. I made a slight change, so now when you type <nowiki>{{wikipedia|Banjo (Banjo-Kazooie)|Banjo}}</nowiki>, it appears as <font color=skyblue>'''Banjo'''</font>. Thanks for the heads up. And don't feel useless; you actually came up with the idea of implementing the template here! Now that deserves some kudos. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 01:08, 12 November 2008 (EST) | ||
::That may be true, but it's always the person who actually takes the plan to completion that deserves the kudos! Thanks so much, Stooben! I owe you. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 01:34, 12 November 2008 (EST) |
Revision as of 02:34, November 12, 2008
Why are we suddenly linking to "more information"? We are an independent party. Wa TC@Y 19:48, 11 November 2008 (EST)
- To provide the reader(s) with information that we can't/won't/neglect to cover. — Stooben Rooben 19:52, 11 November 2008 (EST)
- Um I'm not sure but is coping stuff from other wikis or wikia is consides vandalism right?
Grapes
- In an article. For template or purposes such as that, it's generally to better our wiki's capabilities. Take the new navigation template style for instance; we took that style from Wikipedia, but it betters our wiki by making navigation templates neater, easier to use, and more aesthetically pleasing. — Stooben Rooben 19:56, 11 November 2008 (EST)
- Still though, what will this do? Just create some page links to wikipedia pages of stuff? uper-Yoshi
- Still though, what will this do? Just create some page links to wikipedia pages of stuff? uper-Yoshi
- In an article. For template or purposes such as that, it's generally to better our wiki's capabilities. Take the new navigation template style for instance; we took that style from Wikipedia, but it betters our wiki by making navigation templates neater, easier to use, and more aesthetically pleasing. — Stooben Rooben 19:56, 11 November 2008 (EST)
- Oh. . . But I thought all Wikia and Wikis have the template thing program into the site. Ambidextria
- S-Y: Yes. Articles like Banjo will link to Wikipedia for more information. It's just like the "External Links" or "References" section of a page, only it allows the reader to access Wikipedia (perhaps our most-used source of information) easier. Grapes: No, it depends on what version of MediaWiki a wiki is running on. Wikipedia has top-of-the-line syntax capabilities, because it has virtually every extension possible installed. We have quite a few extensions installed, but we are still missing some. — Stooben Rooben 20:03, 11 November 2008 (EST)
- Oh alrite then, sounds pretty neat. uper-Yoshi
- It still feels like we're bowing to Wikipedia for more information. :/ Wa
TC@Y 20:07, 11 November 2008 (EST)
- Hmm I guess this wiki is missing the new template Stumpers is trying to make. -> See Talk:Main Page Stumpers said there was an error with it. Talk:Main Page
Grapes
- Nevermind Y-S fixed it. Ambidextria
- Hmm I guess this wiki is missing the new template Stumpers is trying to make. -> See Talk:Main Page Stumpers said there was an error with it. Talk:Main Page
- It still feels like we're bowing to Wikipedia for more information. :/ Wa
- Oh alrite then, sounds pretty neat. uper-Yoshi
- S-Y: Yes. Articles like Banjo will link to Wikipedia for more information. It's just like the "External Links" or "References" section of a page, only it allows the reader to access Wikipedia (perhaps our most-used source of information) easier. Grapes: No, it depends on what version of MediaWiki a wiki is running on. Wikipedia has top-of-the-line syntax capabilities, because it has virtually every extension possible installed. We have quite a few extensions installed, but we are still missing some. — Stooben Rooben 20:03, 11 November 2008 (EST)
Oh, you guys... this is why I asked first on the main page! Thanks for your help! Stumpers! 20:20, 11 November 2008 (EST)
- No problem at all! uper-Yoshi
- A lot of that coding was completely unnecessary for this site. I took it out and replaced it with what we would need; now that pesky link isn't floating on the left. — Stooben Rooben 20:45, 11 November 2008 (EST)
- Alrite, so now the question is how and where to put it on an article. uper-Yoshi
- Alrite, so now the question is how and where to put it on an article. uper-Yoshi
- A lot of that coding was completely unnecessary for this site. I took it out and replaced it with what we would need; now that pesky link isn't floating on the left. — Stooben Rooben 20:45, 11 November 2008 (EST)
Yay! It works near perfectly! Thanks, Stooben! Just a question: I know with the original template you could link to a Wikipedia article with a different name and still have it show the proper name (ie Banjo instead of Banjo (Banjo-Kazooie)... it goes better with the template's grammer). You would write {{wikipedia|Banjo (Banjo-Kazooie)|Banjo}}. Do you suppose that when you were optimizing the template for the Mario Wiki, that feature got removed? I'm so sorry that I know nothing about templates... I feel so useless and irritating right now! Stumpers! 21:38, 11 November 2008 (EST)
- No problem! Yeah, I didn't realize that I took out the link renaming option until you mentioned it; sorry. I made a slight change, so now when you type {{wikipedia|Banjo (Banjo-Kazooie)|Banjo}}, it appears as Banjo. Thanks for the heads up. And don't feel useless; you actually came up with the idea of implementing the template here! Now that deserves some kudos. — Stooben Rooben 01:08, 12 November 2008 (EST)