Talk:Offensive Power Shot: Difference between revisions
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Knife: Then do I turn it into a main page proposal thing? {{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 17:36, 29 July 2010 (UTC) | Knife: Then do I turn it into a main page proposal thing? {{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 17:36, 29 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Why don't you make two separate Talk Page Proposals? The first one is that you merge the offensive into offense, the second is that you merge defensive into defensive and so on. {{User:BabyLuigiOnFire/sig}} |
Revision as of 13:24, July 29, 2010
Merge all Offensive Power Shots into this Article as Well as Merging all Defensive Power Shots into Defensive Power Shot
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Tuesday, November 5, 2024, 09:18 GMT
Sorry for the long name, but this proposal may be opposed because it's "inconsistent." Anyway, why do we have all the offensive power shots in separate article and the main article of offensive power shots (which is a stub that cannot be expanded anymore)? Wouldn't it make sense (and wouldn't it save time for those people browsing) if all the offensive power shots are merged into this article? We can make subsections for each offensive power shot, or heck, even a table. Merging this article with all the offensive power shots will make it easier to browse and it gets rid of a stub? Why not? The same thing applies to defensive power shots.
Proposer: LeftyGreenMario (talk)
Deadline: August 11, 2010 24:00 GMT
Support
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) Any reason to oppose?
- Zero777 (talk) I am Zero! Most are stubs and mergeing them would be a good idea, per proposal. Zero signing out.
- Booderdash (talk) As long as all the information is retained and as long as LGM removes her vote from the Super strike article...
Oppose
- Knife (talk) Yes, and you actually mentioned it in your proposal description. Merge these articles and the other Mario sports moves articles must be merged for consistency. This affects way too many articles to be a talk page proposal.
- Fawfulfury65 (talk) Per Knife.
Comments
Knife, shouldn't you post be in the comments? Booderdash (talk)
Well no, that's my oppose reason. Knife (talk)
Knife: Then do I turn it into a main page proposal thing? It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 17:36, 29 July 2010 (UTC)