MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Wario Land 3: Difference between revisions
Booderdash (talk | contribs) (→Oppose) |
m (→Comments) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Why not make a description for the attack patterns and descriptions of the bosses (along with the location in the same table cell)? The enemies have one. This article looks great, by the way. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | Why not make a description for the attack patterns and descriptions of the bosses (along with the location in the same table cell)? The enemies have one. This article looks great, by the way. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||
Also, is it okay if I replace the transformations section in the article with sprites instead of game art? We already have gameart on the bottom of the article. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | |||
Revision as of 18:17, August 28, 2010
Wario Land 3
Support
Oppose
- Booderdash (talk) In construction. Ironic how you nominated it first THEN start adding the enemies you forgot. Plus, theres grammar issues everywhere. Seriously, undefeated enemy? Blue UFO still has problems there.
Removal of Opposes
Comments
Although the article looks fine, I think it would be more consistent if the enemies were also arranged on a table like the bosses. Fawfulfury65 (talk)
It wouldn't hurt if the enemies whose official names are unknown are also listed by conjectural names. --Grandy02 (talk)
I see. I'm not good at naming enemies. But I'll try. I don't think there are too many. Like the mole, the roof slimes, the spiked slimes...Mr bones (talk)
Why not make a description for the attack patterns and descriptions of the bosses (along with the location in the same table cell)? The enemies have one. This article looks great, by the way. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
Also, is it okay if I replace the transformations section in the article with sprites instead of game art? We already have gameart on the bottom of the article. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
