Talk:Mini Donkey Kong: Difference between revisions
Sir Grodus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Unless through something like magic or mixing their parts together, probably not. -- [[User: Sir Grodus|Sir Grodus]] | Unless through something like magic or mixing their parts together, probably not. -- [[User: Sir Grodus|Sir Grodus]] | ||
So That means mini DK's are a species. tell you the truth, i think we should count Mini toys in general as 1 species. [[User:Maxlover2|Max2]] | |||
Latest revision as of 19:34, February 25, 2007
Would Mini Donkey Kongs and various related creatures count as Kongs? -- Sir Grodus
We, these are toys made in likeness of a kong, not a kong itself so no. Plus, how is this thing a specie?Knife (talk) 22:08, 24 February 2007 (EST)
That's a tricky question.--
Aipom 
--
Since other, apparently wholly, mechanical beings such as Bill Blasters and Mecha-Koopas were counted as species I thought that perhaps the minis should be counted as well. -- Sir Grodus
Yes, thats true. It depends on how you understand the context of "species". Dictionary states a specie as; "An individual race of organisms capable of interbreeding with each other.".Knife (talk) 15:45, 25 February 2007 (EST)
Well, can Bill Blasters, which are just cannons, (not even Living cannons!) "interbreed?" Max2
Unless through something like magic or mixing their parts together, probably not. -- Sir Grodus
So That means mini DK's are a species. tell you the truth, i think we should count Mini toys in general as 1 species. Max2
