Talk:Super Star (Yoshi series): Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replacement - "([Pp]roposal|[Ss]ettled)(Outcome|TPP)" to "$1 $2")
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Split Yoshi's Super Star from Mario Party's Super Star==
==Split Yoshi's Super Star from Mario Party's Super Star==
{{TPP}}
{{Settled TPP}}
{{Proposal outcome|passed|8-0|Split}}
 
OK seriously? I don't have a clue why these to are merged. They are obviously two different things, as Yoshi's Super Star is an object and MP's Super Star is just a term. I find it completely ridiculous that two completely different things are merged.
OK seriously? I don't have a clue why these to are merged. They are obviously two different things, as Yoshi's Super Star is an object and MP's Super Star is just a term. I find it completely ridiculous that two completely different things are merged.


Line 12: Line 14:
#{{User|Reddragon19k}} Per all three! This is definitely my favorite type of proposal!
#{{User|Reddragon19k}} Per all three! This is definitely my favorite type of proposal!
#{{User|Dr Javelin}} Definitely shouldn't be merged. Per all.
#{{User|Dr Javelin}} Definitely shouldn't be merged. Per all.
#{{User|Walkazo}} - Per UltraMario3000, but per Baby Mario Bloops when it comes to the articles' names.
#{{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} - I guess, since they mean different things, but I feel like it should be Super Star (Mario Party) and Super Star (Yoshi's Island). I think that is more formal.
#{{User|Superfiremario}} Per BMB.


===Oppose===
===Oppose===
===Comments===
===Comments===
== See above ==
The section above states that the nomination passed 8-0, so why are they still merged? {{User|Yoshi876}}
:Nobody ever unmerged them. {{User|Marshal Dan Troop}}
:Could I ask you to do it, as I am currently very busy with [[Yoshi's Island: Super Mario Advance 3]] categories? {{User|Yoshi876}}
::Done. The [[Super Star (Yoshi series)|section]] is split from the article. {{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 21:10, 28 March 2013 (EDT)
== Disambiguation ==
Just look at the article about thing on the top of the page. It's ridiculous. Shouldn't we have a disambiguation page for Super Star? {{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 21:18, 28 March 2013 (EDT)
==Delete Super Star==
{{Settled TPP}}
{{Proposal outcome|passed|7-0|Delete}}
(this proposal is not the same as [[Talk:Superstar#Delete_Superstar|this one]], so please don't get confused)
Only MarioWiki can write 5 paragraphs describing a very simple, easy to understand term used in Mario Party games.
But seriously, why do we need a page for this? What exactly is its purpose? This article is exactly the same as creating the page {{fake link|Winner}} or {{fake link|Champion}} on the wiki. We don't do that of course, but why should this be exempt from the others? It's exactly like that except it has a fancy name. All of the information on the page is mostly padding anyway.
*'''Proposer''': {{User|Baby Luigi}}
*'''Deadline''': May 1, 2013, 23:59 GMT
===Delete===
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Maybe some people will get clueless once this page is deleted on what "Super Star" means, idk
#{{User|Glowsquid}} per everything written above.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} "Superstar" is this, but Toad is that, and Mario and his friends do things while arguing and doing things, and blah blah blah. Let's create an article on {{fake link|You}} and {{fake link|'re}} and {{fake link|Winner!}} instead.
#{{User|King Pikante}} Per all.
#{{User|BowserJunior}} Per all.
#{{User|MortonBoo99}} Per LGM and proposal.
#{{User|Binarystep}} Per all, especially LGM.
===Keep===
===Comments===
This should be placed in BJaODN. {{User:Binarystep/sig}}
:You know what? I agree. I'll also add some of my commentary on it {{User:BabyLuigiOnFire/sig}} 20:41, 22 April 2013 (EDT)
== Merge with Super Star (power-up) ==
{{Settled TPP}}
{{Proposal outcome|passed|4-0|Merge}}
Super Star is an alternate name for Star(man), and it's also a power-up item that offers invincibility. The fact that it provides Superstar Mario instead of Invincible Mario is essentially moot by this point, as Tanooki Mario can now be gained from either a Tanooki Suit or a Super Leaf (not to mention the version from the Statue Leaf), there are two distinct versions of Ice Mario from an Ice Flower depending on the game, there are multiple forms of Tiny Wario, etc. The only thing going for it is that the sprite doesn't have its usual eyes, but neither do the Super Mushrooms in ''Super Mario Land'' and the original ''Super Mario Bros.''
'''Proposer''': {{User|LinkTheLefty}}<br>
'''Deadline''': December 21, 2014, 23:59 GMT.
===Support===
#{{User|LinkTheLefty}} Per proposal.
#{{User|Toadbrigade5}} Per proposal.
#{{User|River Piranha}} Per proposal.
#{{User|SmokedChili}} Per all.
===Oppose===
===Comments===
Just saying, but there was already a [http://www.mariowiki.com/Talk:Super_Star_%28power-up%29#Split_Stars_from_Yoshi.27s_Island proposal earlier this year] that did the opposite of this. --{{User:SuperYoshiBros/sig}} 14:56, 7 December 2014 (EST)
:That was for a [[Star (Yoshi's Island)|different subject]]. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 17:31, 7 December 2014 (EST)

Latest revision as of 15:30, May 31, 2024

Split Yoshi's Super Star from Mario Party's Super Star[edit]

Settledproposal.svg This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

Split 8-0

OK seriously? I don't have a clue why these to are merged. They are obviously two different things, as Yoshi's Super Star is an object and MP's Super Star is just a term. I find it completely ridiculous that two completely different things are merged.

Proposer: UltraMario3000 (talk)
Deadline: July 7, 2011, 23:59 GMT

Support[edit]

  1. UltraMario3000 (talk) Per my proposal.
  2. Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) Per Proposal
  3. Mario4Ever (talk) Per proposal.
  4. Reddragon19k (talk) Per all three! This is definitely my favorite type of proposal!
  5. Dr Javelin (talk) Definitely shouldn't be merged. Per all.
  6. Walkazo (talk) - Per UltraMario3000, but per Baby Mario Bloops when it comes to the articles' names.
  7. Baby Mario Bloops (talk) - I guess, since they mean different things, but I feel like it should be Super Star (Mario Party) and Super Star (Yoshi's Island). I think that is more formal.
  8. Superfiremario (talk) Per BMB.

Oppose[edit]

Comments[edit]

See above[edit]

The section above states that the nomination passed 8-0, so why are they still merged? Yoshi876 (talk)

Nobody ever unmerged them. Marshal Dan Troop (talk)
Could I ask you to do it, as I am currently very busy with Yoshi's Island: Super Mario Advance 3 categories? Yoshi876 (talk)
Done. The section is split from the article. Icon showing how many lives Mario has left. From Super Mario 64 DS. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 21:10, 28 March 2013 (EDT)

Disambiguation[edit]

Just look at the article about thing on the top of the page. It's ridiculous. Shouldn't we have a disambiguation page for Super Star? Icon showing how many lives Mario has left. From Super Mario 64 DS. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 21:18, 28 March 2013 (EDT)

Delete Super Star[edit]

Settledproposal.svg This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

Delete 7-0

(this proposal is not the same as this one, so please don't get confused)

Only MarioWiki can write 5 paragraphs describing a very simple, easy to understand term used in Mario Party games.

But seriously, why do we need a page for this? What exactly is its purpose? This article is exactly the same as creating the page Winner or Champion on the wiki. We don't do that of course, but why should this be exempt from the others? It's exactly like that except it has a fancy name. All of the information on the page is mostly padding anyway.

Delete[edit]

  1. Baby Luigi (talk) Maybe some people will get clueless once this page is deleted on what "Super Star" means, idk
  2. Glowsquid (talk) per everything written above.
  3. LeftyGreenMario (talk) "Superstar" is this, but Toad is that, and Mario and his friends do things while arguing and doing things, and blah blah blah. Let's create an article on You and 're and Winner! instead.
  4. King Pikante (talk) Per all.
  5. BowserJunior (talk) Per all.
  6. MortonBoo99 (talk) Per LGM and proposal.
  7. Binarystep (talk) Per all, especially LGM.

Keep[edit]

Comments[edit]

This should be placed in BJaODN. Niiue - Who has lost his tail?

You know what? I agree. I'll also add some of my commentary on it BabyLuigiFire.pngRay Trace(T|C) 20:41, 22 April 2013 (EDT)

Merge with Super Star (power-up)[edit]

Settledproposal.svg This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

Merge 4-0

Super Star is an alternate name for Star(man), and it's also a power-up item that offers invincibility. The fact that it provides Superstar Mario instead of Invincible Mario is essentially moot by this point, as Tanooki Mario can now be gained from either a Tanooki Suit or a Super Leaf (not to mention the version from the Statue Leaf), there are two distinct versions of Ice Mario from an Ice Flower depending on the game, there are multiple forms of Tiny Wario, etc. The only thing going for it is that the sprite doesn't have its usual eyes, but neither do the Super Mushrooms in Super Mario Land and the original Super Mario Bros.

Proposer: LinkTheLefty (talk)
Deadline: December 21, 2014, 23:59 GMT.

Support[edit]

  1. LinkTheLefty (talk) Per proposal.
  2. Toadbrigade5 (talk) Per proposal.
  3. River Piranha (talk) Per proposal.
  4. SmokedChili (talk) Per all.

Oppose[edit]

Comments[edit]

Just saying, but there was already a proposal earlier this year that did the opposite of this. --Waluigi's head icon in Mario Kart 8 Deluxe. Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 14:56, 7 December 2014 (EST)

That was for a different subject. LinkTheLefty (talk) 17:31, 7 December 2014 (EST)