MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Mario 3D Land: Difference between revisions
m (→Support) |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
(19 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{FA archive notice|nominated=16:07, 25 July 2012 (EDT)|passed=21:16, 29 August 2012 (EDT)}} | |||
{{ | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
|nominated=16:07, 25 July | |||
|passed= | |||
}} | |||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} I think Super Mario 3D Land deserves to be a FA, because it isn't too short or long, and the pictures aren't that bad. | #{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} I think Super Mario 3D Land deserves to be a FA, because it isn't too short or long, and the pictures aren't that bad. | ||
Line 18: | Line 15: | ||
#{{User|World10}} | #{{User|World10}} | ||
#{{User|Mariobros1985}} | #{{User|Mariobros1985}} | ||
#{{User|Baja}} | |||
#{{User|Koopa K}} | |||
#{{User|LuigiBlubber}} | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Line 53: | Line 46: | ||
Alright! I deleted all of them except Bowser capturing Peach! | Alright! I deleted all of them except Bowser capturing Peach! | ||
{{User | {{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} | ||
I think we need at least about 2 to 3 images from features to the bottom. I think there's is a lot of text and lists there but only a few images. {{User | I think we need at least about 2 to 3 images from features to the bottom. I think there's is a lot of text and lists there but only a few images. {{User|YoshiGo99}} | ||
Are 8 images good enough? | Are 8 images good enough? | ||
{{User | {{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} | ||
I think at least up to 5. I can add them if you want.{{user|YoshiGo99}} | I think at least up to 5. I can add them if you want.{{user|YoshiGo99}} | ||
Line 69: | Line 62: | ||
There are already 8 images, so 3 need to be deleted. | There are already 8 images, so 3 need to be deleted. | ||
{{User | {{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} | ||
Oh, by the way, does anyone like my new sig? | Oh, by the way, does anyone like my new sig? | ||
Line 79: | Line 72: | ||
A reason? What do you mean? Oh, that one? Awesome image! | A reason? What do you mean? Oh, that one? Awesome image! | ||
{{User | {{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} | ||
I was expecting the Luigi picture, but this one works too {{User|World10}} | I was expecting the Luigi picture, but this one works too {{User|World10}} | ||
Line 85: | Line 78: | ||
Do you want to support this article, W10? | Do you want to support this article, W10? | ||
{{User | {{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} | ||
The only thing that disturbs me is the feature list. I mean, should we make it shorter? {{User|World10}} | The only thing that disturbs me is the feature list. I mean, should we make it shorter? {{User|World10}} | ||
Line 91: | Line 84: | ||
Not really. That makes it more detailed. | Not really. That makes it more detailed. | ||
{{User | {{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} | ||
I suppose that we could try a table to see if it looks better. I'm all for it! I'd do it myself if I knew how to. {{User|RosalinaSilverCrown}} | I suppose that we could try a table to see if it looks better. I'm all for it! I'd do it myself if I knew how to. {{User|RosalinaSilverCrown}} | ||
Line 97: | Line 90: | ||
Is LightningBlue ever going to remove his oppose?! | Is LightningBlue ever going to remove his oppose?! | ||
{{User | {{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} | ||
A sysop needs to vote to remove his vote before it gets removed. (Although I personally think that's not a very good rule.) {{User|Master R.O.B}} | A sysop needs to vote to remove his vote before it gets removed. (Although I personally think that's not a very good rule.) {{User|Master R.O.B}} | ||
:Actually it just has to be an admin which means a Patroller could vote to remove his vote then you'd have to wait 24 hours before you could remove it. Also it's a great rule it stops fans from trying to remove valid votes. {{User|Raven Effect}} | :Actually it just has to be an admin which means a Patroller could vote to remove his vote then you'd have to wait 24 hours before you could remove it. Also it's a great rule it stops fans from trying to remove valid votes. {{User|Raven Effect}} | ||
Hey since I was the guy who brought up the above discussed images in the story section I thought I'd better say that two images in that section's actually quite okay. {{User|Commander Code-8}} | |||
We need a sysop to remove LightningBlue's oppose. {{User|Koopa K}} | |||
2 more days! | |||
{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} |
Latest revision as of 16:42, May 31, 2024
This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Super Mario 3D Land was nominated to be a featured article at 16:07, 25 July 2012 (EDT) and passed at 20:16, 5 September 2012.
Super Mario 3D Land
Support
- Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) I think Super Mario 3D Land deserves to be a FA, because it isn't too short or long, and the pictures aren't that bad.
- Spenzer66 (talk)
- MarioGameChampion (talk)
- RosalinaSilverCrown (talk)
- Commander Code-8 (talk)
- YoshiPickle (talk)
- Mario3D64 (talk)
- Vommack (talk)
- Kamek the magikoopa (talk)
- Byllant (talk)
- World10 (talk)
- Mariobros1985 (talk)
- Baja (talk)
- Koopa K (talk)
- LuigiBlubber (talk)
Oppose
Removal of Opposes
Comments
I'm not going to Oppose this but would of liked some tables in this article instead of lots of listed items like this:
Apart from that, the article is very good. New Super Yoshi (talk)
@Commander Code-8:
The picture make it more detailed. All of them are needed.
Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) 18:36, 3 August 2012 (EDT)Electrical Bowser jr.
Let's make this Featured! Anyone want to?
Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) 18:46, 3 August 2012 (EDT)Electrical Bowser jr.
Like Electrical Bowser jr. said, the pictures make the article much more detailed. Mainly for people who haven't played the game. RosalinaSilverCrown (talk)
- The amount of images in that section don't even stay next to the text they relate to, which doesn't really look good at all. Is that much detail really needed?--Commander Code-8 (talk) 02:14, 5 August 2012 (EDT)
Alright! I deleted all of them except Bowser capturing Peach!
I think we need at least about 2 to 3 images from features to the bottom. I think there's is a lot of text and lists there but only a few images. YoshiGo99 (talk)
Are 8 images good enough?
I think at least up to 5. I can add them if you want.YoshiGo99 (talk)
Also, shouldn't we make the loooong feature list shorter? Like a table? World10 (talk)
I think that at least two of the main story's images should be put back on the article. If we have pics of development,then we can at least have the main story a bit more visual. RosalinaSilverCrown (talk)
There are already 8 images, so 3 need to be deleted.
Oh, by the way, does anyone like my new sig?
You're not actually supposed to put signatures on vote pages (Proposals and FA noms)--Commander Code-8 (talk)
It seems as though everyone shrugged off my last comment on the whole thing about images. So I'm gonna put one more pic on the main story section,then you guys can give me your opinion if you disagree with image. If somebody gives me a good reason,then I will glady take it down. RosalinaSilverCrown (talk)
A reason? What do you mean? Oh, that one? Awesome image!
I was expecting the Luigi picture, but this one works too World10 (talk)
Do you want to support this article, W10?
The only thing that disturbs me is the feature list. I mean, should we make it shorter? World10 (talk)
Not really. That makes it more detailed.
I suppose that we could try a table to see if it looks better. I'm all for it! I'd do it myself if I knew how to. RosalinaSilverCrown (talk)
Is LightningBlue ever going to remove his oppose?!
A sysop needs to vote to remove his vote before it gets removed. (Although I personally think that's not a very good rule.) Master R.O.B (talk)
- Actually it just has to be an admin which means a Patroller could vote to remove his vote then you'd have to wait 24 hours before you could remove it. Also it's a great rule it stops fans from trying to remove valid votes. Raven Effect (talk)
Hey since I was the guy who brought up the above discussed images in the story section I thought I'd better say that two images in that section's actually quite okay. Commander Code-8 (talk)
We need a sysop to remove LightningBlue's oppose. Koopa K (talk)
2 more days!