Talk:Superstar: Difference between revisions
BowserJunior (talk | contribs) m (→Delete) |
m (Text replacement - "([Pp]roposal|[Ss]ettled)(Outcome|TPP)" to "$1 $2") |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Delete Superstar== | ==Delete Superstar== | ||
{{TPP}} | {{Settled TPP}} | ||
{{Proposal outcome|passed|6-0|delete}} | |||
This article is totally pointless. Why do we even have articles about an insignificant title? Even the article about title, "Super Star" has more relevance than this article since it describes a winning character in the Mario Party games (it's still pointless and I could be put it up for deletion since most of the article about that "Super Star" is mainly padding). If this is bad for consistency, then I'll propose deleting all other useless title articles if my proposal turns out well. | This article is totally pointless. Why do we even have articles about an insignificant title? Even the article about title, "Super Star" has more relevance than this article since it describes a winning character in the Mario Party games (it's still pointless and I could be put it up for deletion since most of the article about that "Super Star" is mainly padding). If this is bad for consistency, then I'll propose deleting all other useless title articles if my proposal turns out well. | ||
| Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
#{{User|King Pikante}} Per all. | #{{User|King Pikante}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|BowserJunior}} Per all. | #{{User|BowserJunior}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|MortonBoo99}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|Walkazo}} - Per BabyLuigiOnFire. But I don't think it should go on BJAODN: it's unnecessary, but it's not nonsense. | |||
===Keep=== | ===Keep=== | ||
Latest revision as of 15:30, May 31, 2024
Why does this page even exist? What is its purpose? 
Ray Trace(T|C) 00:12, 3 April 2013 (EDT)
- It exists because it exists. I've always wondered why we need an article for a random title people give Mario and Luigi. Can you imagine people wondering "Hmm, I wonder what "Superstar" in 'Superstar Saga' means? I know! I'll search for it in MarioWiki!" You might as well create an article called "Partners in Time".
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 00:17, 3 April 2013 (EDT)
Delete Superstar[edit]
|
This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal. |
delete 6-0
This article is totally pointless. Why do we even have articles about an insignificant title? Even the article about title, "Super Star" has more relevance than this article since it describes a winning character in the Mario Party games (it's still pointless and I could be put it up for deletion since most of the article about that "Super Star" is mainly padding). If this is bad for consistency, then I'll propose deleting all other useless title articles if my proposal turns out well.
Proposer: BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
Deadline: April 21, 2013, 23:59 GMT
Delete[edit]
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Why am I even required to put a reasoning here since I wrote this proposal.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) "Hmm, I wonder what "Superstar" in 'Superstar Saga' means? I know! I'll search for it in MarioWiki!" Per proposal and my comments.
- King Pikante (talk) Per all.
- BowserJunior (talk) Per all.
- MortonBoo99 (talk) Per all.
- Walkazo (talk) - Per BabyLuigiOnFire. But I don't think it should go on BJAODN: it's unnecessary, but it's not nonsense.
Keep[edit]
Comments[edit]
I think Super Star needs a look as well. 
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 18:44, 7 April 2013 (EDT)
