MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Geno: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
#{{User|Garlic Man}} - I read the article, and it's Brilliant. Awesomely written. I think some people might note about the short lead, but as I read the article, I could tell that they were an experienced writer. Great, informative article right here.
#{{User|Garlic Man}} - I read the article, and it's Brilliant. Awesomely written. I think some people might note about the short lead, but as I read the article, I could tell that they were an experienced writer. Great, informative article right here.
#{{User|Luigi3000}} - ditto. It is so good. Iwish there was more to wright!
#{{User|Luigi3000}} - ditto. It is so good. Iwish there was more to wright!
#{{User|Stooben Rooben}} - The article is adequate. However, I would like the red link to [[Super Star Shot]] to be blue.
#{{User|Stooben Rooben}} - The article is adequate. However, I would like the red link MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L
#{{User|Crystal Batamon}} - The article was very well written and compiled virtually every known thing about Geno! Well done.
#{{User:Geno SMRPG}} - Geno needs to be the Featured Article. I am as my user name says,I'm a BIG fan of Geno.Ignore the thing about the green Geno pic, I resovled it.
==== Oppose ====
#I really feel the History section could be a tad bit longer, also the other apperance section needs to be greatly inproved apon. {{User:Luigibros2/sig}}
 
==== Comments ====
'''Stooby''': Yeah, I noticed Super Star Shot as well; but I do not have the game, unfortunately, and could not write the article. But since 1 seems like a "reasonable" number of red links, I don't think it'll affect the status that much. {{User|Garlic Man}}
:Thus why I didn't oppose. ;) I just wanted to point out that the article would look almost perfect if there weren't any red links. I haven't played it either, so I couldn't create it though. {{User|Stooben Rooben}}
::Okay :). Also, is there any reason why you keep changing signatures into the User template in the comments section? I don't see how they would interfere here. (Although in the Supports/Opposes they can screw up the numbering at times). {{User|Garlic Man}}
:::I mainly do it because it can take some computers too long to load, particularly if the sigs have massive coding or animations in them. (Mine takes quite a while to load.) {{User|Stooben Rooben}}
::::Ah, yes. But it must take a heck of a long time to load your talk page as well, then :P. {{User|Garlic Man}}
:I just took the link parts off of it. It's technically not a real attack. {{user|InfectedShroom}}

Revision as of 19:58, November 17, 2008

"Geno" was nominated for featured article status at 18:48, 18 September 2008. If the nomination does not pass by 18:48, 17 November 2008, it will be considered failed.

Geno

Support

  1. Garlic Man (talk) - I read the article, and it's Brilliant. Awesomely written. I think some people might note about the short lead, but as I read the article, I could tell that they were an experienced writer. Great, informative article right here.
  2. Luigi3000 (talk) - ditto. It is so good. Iwish there was more to wright!
  3. Stooben Rooben (talk) - The article is adequate. However, I would like the red link MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L MR.L
Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/N1/Geno&oldid=480105"