User talk:RHG1951: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 209: | Line 209: | ||
::::::::SmashWiki is a good resource for ''Super Smash Bros.'' information, and I have zero problems with it. If you're concerned how content is being handled, talk to them about it. Because the root of why you want to keep ''Super Smash Bros.'' on the Super Mario Wiki is "I don't like how they do their coverage." There's literal millions of wikis out there on a wide variety of subjects. So what if, let's say, you didn't like how a Xenoblade wiki handled their content. Are we suddenly going to have full coverage for every ''Xenoblade'' game solely due to one or two users' disagreements? Of course not! [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 14:05, April 9, 2024 (EDT) | ::::::::SmashWiki is a good resource for ''Super Smash Bros.'' information, and I have zero problems with it. If you're concerned how content is being handled, talk to them about it. Because the root of why you want to keep ''Super Smash Bros.'' on the Super Mario Wiki is "I don't like how they do their coverage." There's literal millions of wikis out there on a wide variety of subjects. So what if, let's say, you didn't like how a Xenoblade wiki handled their content. Are we suddenly going to have full coverage for every ''Xenoblade'' game solely due to one or two users' disagreements? Of course not! [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 14:05, April 9, 2024 (EDT) | ||
:::::::::You're putting words in my mouth now. This is a tired old debate that you weren't around for the first hundred times; Smash Wiki does not ''want'' to be handled in any manner but the overanalytical manner it currently is, and until ''very'' recently the extended ''Mario'' games had a disproportionately large amount of representation in the series for obvious reasons (since encroached by ''Fire Emblem'' for inexplicable reasons). Also, we're doing this on someone's talk page. Just... please stop being so overzealous in advocating outright deletion of things you don't want. (Also, pretty rich you're saying this to the owner of the [https://triforcewiki.com/wiki/Main_Page Triforce Wiki], made solely because of Zelda Wiki's mis-handling.) [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 09:23, April 10, 2024 (EDT) | :::::::::You're putting words in my mouth now. This is a tired old debate that you weren't around for the first hundred times; Smash Wiki does not ''want'' to be handled in any manner but the overanalytical manner it currently is, and until ''very'' recently the extended ''Mario'' games had a disproportionately large amount of representation in the series for obvious reasons (since encroached by ''Fire Emblem'' for inexplicable reasons). Also, we're doing this on someone's talk page. Just... please stop being so overzealous in advocating outright deletion of things you don't want. (Also, pretty rich you're saying this to the owner of the [https://triforcewiki.com/wiki/Main_Page Triforce Wiki], made solely because of Zelda Wiki's mis-handling.) [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 09:23, April 10, 2024 (EDT) | ||
::::::::::There's a conflict over the enactment of the proposal, and you were the first to comment on this very talk page, followed by a few others. I'm sure the site would appreciate if your problem on how other wikis handle their content doesn't become this site's problem as well. From what it sounds, if you were keen on creating a Zelda wiki due to disliking how one wiki handles their coverage, what's stopping you from starting a smash brothers wiki then for the same? This is not supposed to be our problem, nor is your Zelda wiki. | ::::::::::@Doc von Schmeltwick: There's a conflict over the enactment of the proposal, and you were the first to comment on this very talk page, followed by a few others. I'm sure the site would appreciate if your problem on how other wikis handle their content doesn't become this site's problem as well. From what it sounds, if you were keen on creating a Zelda wiki due to disliking how one wiki handles their coverage, what's stopping you from starting a smash brothers wiki then for the same? This is not supposed to be our problem, nor is your Zelda wiki. | ||
:::::::::: | ::::::::::@RHG1951: Anyway, it's taken a few hours, but I've tagged all of the redirects (and a few moveset disambiguation pages) that will be affected by the scope of the proposal while excluding any fighter redirects; this way, it's more clear as to what needs to be pruned/deleted (over 400 things). Sorry about all these messages. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 19:01, April 12, 2024 (EDT) | ||
