User talk:B.wilson: Difference between revisions
(→Re: Bad Transparency?: new section) |
|||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
== Re: Bad Transparency? == | == Re: Bad Transparency? == | ||
Hey, I'm not sure what you mean when you say "transparency is way too bad" on [[:File:Question.png]]. Other images such as [[:File:Check small.png]] and [[:File:X mark.png]] have transparent backgrounds. Can you please explain why you reverted the image? - [[User:Tycerius|Tycerius]] 04:22, 27 January 2012 (EST) | |||
Hey, I'm not sure what you mean when you say "transparency is way too bad" on [[:File:Question.png]]. Other images such as [[:File:Check small.png]] and [[:File:X mark.png]] have transparent backgrounds. - [[User:Tycerius|Tycerius]] 04:22, 27 January 2012 (EST) |
Revision as of 04:30, January 27, 2012
Archives |
---|
|
If you leave me a message, I will reply here. Please place this page on your watchlist to watch any reply I will make.
I will archive any post within 24-48 hours if I feel the discussion is over (in most cases, if there are no replies within a day or two).
Please feel free to give me reminders or warnings if I made a mistake (especially if it comes to civility) because I will listen to you, of course, if you are civil.
Please leave me a message by clicking here.
Template
The template you proposed in your proposal can only work with subst:, correct? Is there any way around that? I'd rather not type out subst: every time and have the raw coding splattered at the top of the page.--Knife (talk) 14:20, 16 January 2012 (EST)
- For now, only subst: will work, but I'll try to change that; and subst: is not a big of a deal, because it substitutes a template with a parameter. --Bryce talk contributions 23:53, 16 January 2012 (EST)
Could you respond here?--Knife (talk) 16:56, 24 January 2012 (EST)
List of Notices in Brawl article
Just out of curiosity, why did you "userfy" it? Mario4Ever (talk)
- In case if the opposers still want to read the article if consensus is to delete it. --Bryce talk contributions 22:14, 19 January 2012 (EST)
RE:Don't create test pages
I thought you where treating it seriously. Sorry. --File:Yoshidarkblue.pngNew Super Yoshi 14:45, 20 January 2012 (EST)
New userbox
Hi Bryce! I'm glad to see that you are not semi-retired anymore. Thats great! anyway, I've got a new userbox. Here...
File:Yk.jpg | This user is a fantastic friend of YoshiKong (talk). |
Your a fantastic contributer. Keep up the great work!
- Thanks! --Bryce talk contributions 07:34, 21 January 2012 (EST)
- That Super Radio... Good job in giving him a warning, but I previouly gave him a last warning, and he did mention somewhere that he doesn't care how many warnings he recieves, so I don't think it teaches him anything... Shokora (talk · edits)
- Given due to behavior. I'll be giving {{lastwarn}} if his noted behavior continues. --Bryce talk contributions 04:36, 22 January 2012 (EST)
- If he continues...just revert his disruptive actions, warn him, don't do anything else. Deny recognition. --Bryce talk contributions 04:43, 22 January 2012 (EST)
- Go ahead, my friend. --Bryce talk contributions 04:46, 22 January 2012 (EST)
Bad-faith reversions
It's plainly seen why I reverted that edit. It added nothing to the article. Redstar 15:15, 23 January 2012 (EST)
- As I said before, NO ONE could see why, because that edit was helpful and made in good-faith. Reverting good-faith edits without explanation can be seen as a violation of the courtesy policy. --Bryce talk contributions 20:26, 23 January 2012 (EST)
Hi!
Hey Bryce! I got the urge to say hello. Wanna go to the chat room?
- Hi YK...I really don't go to the chatroom because I'm busy very often. Are you well? --Bryce talk contributions 20:35, 23 January 2012 (EST)
Oh. I understand. Yes, I'm well. I just created this article. Do ya like it? PS. You can call be Ben, if you want :) --Yoshikong
- Awesome Ben. Do you think you can register for en-wiki one day? :) --Bryce talk contributions 20:39, 23 January 2012 (EST)
- Yes, of course! I was meaning to do that for some time, but I love this Wiki so much, that I guess it slipped my mind! I love Wikipedia. It got me through sixth grade when I did a project on the Gold Rush. Can I please ask you, nowadays, do you contribute to the SMW or Wikipedia more? --Ben.
- Wikipedia, of course. AfC's, AfD's, New page patrolling, vandalism fighting, and the like. --Bryce talk contributions 20:45, 23 January 2012 (EST)
- Fantastic! Keep up the great work buddy! Sorry, but if I do join Wikipedia, I won't contribute vey much because I will usually be on this site. But I might help Mario-related topics! --Ben.
Hey! It's just me and you online! --Ben
- Hiya --Bryce talk contributions 05:02, 24 January 2012 (EST)
- Listen! File:WL4-Monsoon Jungle.ogg. It's so cool! You like music, right? You night like this! --Ben
I did not know that
Sorry dude.--File:Yoshidarkblue.pngNew Super Yoshi 11:05, 24 January 2012 (EST)
Silver Star
The Silver Star artwork was a recolor I did. It can be found here [1] with my other artwork I have doneYoshiGo99
- OK, so that's the reason why you reverted it? --Bryce talk contributions 08:09, 25 January 2012 (EST)
Re: new stub
Good idea, but the way it's worded now is awkward in places and takes too long to get to the part where stubs and how to fix them are explained. It might be more efficient to say "The page(s) you recently created ({{{1}}}) is/are stub(s) and will be deleted unless more information is added within the week. Please don't be offended; consider improving and expanding the article instead. Thank you." I also changed the signing stuff on {{Delete-reason}} and suggest you do the same with this one. Finally, this template should have the same background colour as Delete-reason, like how the New Stub template is the same as Delete. - Walkazo 20:41, 25 January 2012 (EST)
- Looks good, but make the "(s)" part of "stub(s)" part of the link (so it's all blue). - Walkazo 21:26, 25 January 2012 (EST)
Re: Bad Transparency?
Hey, I'm not sure what you mean when you say "transparency is way too bad" on File:Question.png. Other images such as File:Check small.png and File:X mark.png have transparent backgrounds. Can you please explain why you reverted the image? - Tycerius 04:22, 27 January 2012 (EST)