Category talk:Crossover areas: Difference between revisions
Waluigi Time (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
#{{User|Eldritchdraaks}} Per proposal | #{{User|Eldritchdraaks}} Per proposal | ||
#{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per proposal. | #{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per proposal. | ||
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} Per proposal. | |||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Revision as of 17:29, January 25, 2018
Delete this category
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Monday, November 25, 2024, 13:51 GMT
Why have a category that solely says that everything in it appears in a crossover? We already have Category:Crossover Games, and it goes without saying that anything that appears in one of those games also appears in a crossover. I don't see a need to specifically make it clear that, yes, the stuff in this crossover game is, in fact, in a crossover. We also already have Category:3rd Party Places for locations that specifically originate from outside Nintendo (it was created after this category, but its name fits with the previously established Category:3rd Party Characters). There's no way to change this category so that it has some practical benefit without a ridiculous amount of overlap. Why do only the locations, of all things, get a specialized category, anyways? There's no similar "Crossover" category for characters, items, enemies, or anything else. I think that creating similar categories for all of those subjects would be overkill, so I'll propose the opposite: delete this page.
Proposer: Time Turner (talk)
Deadline: February 8, 2018, 23:59 GMT
Support
- Time Turner (talk) Per proposal.
- Eldritchdraaks (talk) Per proposal
- Waluigi Time (talk) Per proposal.
- Toadette the Achiever (talk) Per proposal.
