User talk:35.136.168.227

Edit summaries

This is an improper use of an edit summary. There's no reason for the angry comment like that in the edit summary. While, yes, it is disappointing that they had to go back on this, I don't recall them actually promising adding Mario in Ralph Breaks the Internet. Just that they'd work on it. 18:04, 27 October 2018 (EDT) I am sorry I am not trying to excuse my actions but basically my anger has gotten the best of me unfortunately this comment came too late since I just wrote another angry comment but on another note however that Rich Moore basically lied since he did promise it look up Rich Moore promising he would be in the sequel if you don't believe me and it's very fishy that they apparently couldn't get Mario in especially since there are Mario related elements in the movie and I do not believe that Disney and Nintendo have a bad relationship right now. Moments like these are reasons why I wish I owned the rights to these characters because then things like this wouldn't have happened (at least not as often as they do now) just sayin

You don't need to file any papers to make a reference to something, or at least I don't think you do (otherwise there'd be a lot of companies in trouble). So things like the ? Block and Super Mushroom and maybe sound effects can be used, but they had to grab the license for Bowser. Felix even name-dropped Mario in the first movie, which I don't think requires a license either. Mario is quite possibly the most expensive video game character to use in something non-Mario related, and there is also the Illumination movie coming up. Because of those, I honestly didn't expect the idea of adding Mario to Ralph Breaks the Internet to go through, though I was hoping. 18:18, 27 October 2018 (EDT)

I see what your saying though at least some of my points still stand nonetheless.

Perhaps you'd like to show me where it was "promised" the writers will include Mario in Ralph Breaks the Internet? I only remember interviews saying they had planned to add him in, never actually promising Mario would be. Plans can change. 01:11, 3 November 2018 (EDT)

https://screenrant.com/wreck-it-ralph-2-sequel-mario/ Here you go how could they lie to us!? This is an injustice may Ralph breaks the internet fail very badly.

• "Well, Moore already has plans to include one icon of the video game industry in the next movie: Mario."
• "We’ll really come up with something good for Mario to do [in the next film]“, says Moore. “To be able to present him in the sequel, would be great."

I'm not seeing an actual solid promise here. Only conceptual plannings. 01:17, 3 November 2018 (EDT)

"but the reason is unknown that is for certain mark my words though they will pay for this one day. I suggest we mario fans go and boycott this movie to show that we will stand for this injustice"
Furthermore, I already explained above why they couldn't add him. And again, please do not use edit summaries in this way. Continuing to do so will lead to a ban. 01:20, 3 November 2018 (EDT) I am sorry I will just stay off that article for now and while I am not attempting to excuse what I said (only explain why I acted this way) as a huge mario fan and all hearing this really angers me. Hopefully though I will be better the next time I edit that page.

'Twould appear you weren't. Still improper usage. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 21:48, 21 November 2018 (EST)

I thought that I was just not supposed not be so harsh I was actually trying to avoid that well stupid me I may as well go look for the rules on what exactly is improper usage.