MarioWiki talk:BJAODN/Lists: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Arend moved page MarioWiki talk:BJAODN/List articles to MarioWiki talk:BJAODN/Lists: As per suggestion by SolemnStormcloud (see this article's talk page)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It's a little weird to be suggesting a rename for a page created so recently, but when I [[User talk:Mario#New BJAODN categories|asked administrator Mario]] to add a link to this collection on the locked [[MarioWiki:BJAODN|BJAODN main page]], she used the name "Lists" instead of its actual name "List articles"—this is inconsistent with every other link on the main page. She reasoned that "Lists" would benefit from brevity, and I kind of agree with this sentiment—"List articles" is a little clunky. Regardless of this, we should either correct the link on the main page or rename this page for consistency's sake. Which will it be? [[User:SolemnStormcloud|SolemnStormcloud]] ([[User talk:SolemnStormcloud|talk]]) 14:28, May 21, 2024 (EDT) | It's a little weird to be suggesting a rename for a page created so recently, but when I [[User talk:Mario#New BJAODN categories|asked administrator Mario]] to add a link to this collection on the locked [[MarioWiki:BJAODN|BJAODN main page]], she used the name "Lists" instead of its actual name "List articles"—this is inconsistent with every other link on the main page. She reasoned that "Lists" would benefit from brevity, and I kind of agree with this sentiment—"List articles" is a little clunky. Regardless of this, we should either correct the link on the main page or rename this page for consistency's sake. Which will it be? [[User:SolemnStormcloud|SolemnStormcloud]] ([[User talk:SolemnStormcloud|talk]]) 14:28, May 21, 2024 (EDT) | ||
:When I first thought of the idea, I had initially named it in my head "Lists" too, but I had decided on "List articles" for clarity, given that these collections contain chunks of lists instead of complete lists. But if you guys think "Lists" is overall better, then I'll rename it, sure. {{User:Arend/sig}} 14:41, May 21, 2024 (EDT) | :When I first thought of the idea, I had initially named it in my head "Lists" too, but I had decided on "List articles" for clarity, given that these collections contain chunks of lists instead of complete lists. But if you guys think "Lists" is overall better, then I'll rename it, sure. {{User:Arend/sig}} 14:41, May 21, 2024 (EDT) | ||
::BTW, it looks like Mario had piped the link to this collection, so the locked article has to be edited anyway to replace the redirect. Now, that at least can be done by the Porplebot, so no big deal. {{User:Arend/sig}} 14:45, May 21, 2024 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:45, May 21, 2024
Rename?
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
It's a little weird to be suggesting a rename for a page created so recently, but when I asked administrator Mario to add a link to this collection on the locked BJAODN main page, she used the name "Lists" instead of its actual name "List articles"—this is inconsistent with every other link on the main page. She reasoned that "Lists" would benefit from brevity, and I kind of agree with this sentiment—"List articles" is a little clunky. Regardless of this, we should either correct the link on the main page or rename this page for consistency's sake. Which will it be? SolemnStormcloud (talk) 14:28, May 21, 2024 (EDT)
- When I first thought of the idea, I had initially named it in my head "Lists" too, but I had decided on "List articles" for clarity, given that these collections contain chunks of lists instead of complete lists. But if you guys think "Lists" is overall better, then I'll rename it, sure.
rend (talk) (edits) 14:41, May 21, 2024 (EDT)
