MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mii: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(met FA status requirements) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{FANOMSTAT | {{FANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=18:59, 23 June 2009 (EDT) | |nominated=18:59, 23 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
|passed= | |passed=12:30, 19 September 2009 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
Revision as of 15:03, September 20, 2009
Mii
Support
- Yoshario (talk) - This article is in-depth and detailed, covers all Mario-appearances, and has images to support it. I think its ready to become featured.
- Baby Mario Bloops (talk) - The Mii article is fitting to be featured. All the sections are nice and lengthy, not too short at all (maybe the Dr. Mario & Germbuster one). I say it would be nice to have it a featured article.
- bowser jrs number 1 fan (talk)-the mii article should be a featured article its not that short and the sections are nice and lengthy but dr. mario and germ buster is a bit short.
- Lu-igi board (talk) great article but the images are mostly poor.
- Pie Shroom (talk) This article is well written and deserves to be an FA.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)Now the picture is better, I'm on for it.
- Mario64fanatic (talk) The article is well stated, for a character who is basiclly not a Mario character.
- McQueenMario (talk) - It's good now.
- Platitudinous (talk) It has all of the info I need on Miis in the Mario series.
Oppose
Removal of Opposes
Comments
I hate Miis, they are not even from the Marioverse! Ironnical that Mii will become an FA and Mario is not Tucayo (talk)
- Well, if you recall that FAs are about the article's quality rather than its topic, it's not that ironical anymore. Time Q (talk)
- The other "first picture" was Image:Mii.png. Should it be switched to that? –Yoshario (talk)
