Proposals can be new features (such as an extension), removal of a previously added feature that has tired out, or new policies that must be approved via consensus before any action(s) are done.
|
A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed using the code {{user|User name}}.
This page observes the No-Signature Policy.
How To
- Actions that users feel are appropriate to have community approval first can be added by anyone, but they must have a strong argument.
- Users then vote and discuss on the issue during that week. The "deadline" for the proposal is one week from posting at:
- Monday to Thursday: 17:00 (5pm)
- Friday and Saturday: 20:00 (8pm)
- Sunday: 15:00 (3pm)
- Every vote should have a reason accompanying it.
- At any time a vote may be rejected if at least three active users believe the vote truly has no merit or was cast in bad faith. However, there must be strong reasons supporting the invalidation.
- "# " should be added under the last vote of each support/oppose section to show another blank line.
- All proposals that end up in a tie will be extended for another week.
- If a proposal has more than ten votes, it can only pass or fail by a margin of three votes. If a proposal reaches the deadline and the total number of votes for each option differ by two or less votes, the deadline will be extended for another week.
- Any proposal that has three votes or less at deadline will automatically be listed as "NO QUORUM." The original proposer then has the option to relist said proposal to generate more discussion.
- No proposal can overturn the decision of a previous proposal that is less than 4 weeks (28 days) old.
- Proposals can only be rewritten or deleted by their proposer within the first three days of their creation. However, the proposer can request that their proposal be deleted by a Sysop at any time, provided they have a valid reason for it.
- All proposals are archived. The original proposer must take action accordingly if the outcome of the proposal dictates it. If it requires the help of a Sysop, the proposer can ask for that help.
- There shouldn't be proposals about creating articles on a underrepresented or completely absent subject, unless there is major disagreement about whether the content should be included. To organize efforts about completing articles on missing subjects, try creating a PipeProject.
- Proposals can not be made about System Operator promotions and demotions. Sysops can only be promoted and demoted by the will of Bureaucrats.
- If the Sysops deem a proposal unnecessary or potentially detrimental to the upkeep of the Super Mario Wiki, they have the right to remove it at any time.
- No joke proposals. Proposals are serious wiki matters, and should be handled professionally. Joke proposals will be deleted on sight.
The times are in EDT (UTC -4:00), and are set so that the user is more likely to be online at those times (after work/school, weekend nights). If a proposal is added on Saturday night at 11:59 PM EDT, the deadline is the next Saturday night at 8:00 PM. If it is a minute later, the deadline is a day plus 15 hours (Sunday), as opposed to a day minus 4 hours.
New Features
No name, no vote, no creator's username, delete, Version 2
Alright a few months back we had a proposal known as "No name, no vote, no creator's username, deleted poll" which is a small rule for the poll selection page which organized voteing , the proposal pass, but when it pass the poll selection page was no longer used (which sucks because it just happen with no warning and a lot of users like it because it was a lot of fun. I still think the Poll selection page should still be running), so I came up with the idea to apply this rule to the FI and proposal page (I'm not sure if the FA has the support or oppose system, but if it does then it will be apply to that page also.). For all the new users who don't know what I'm talking about it's just basically if you don't put your username under support or oppose as: #(username here) or without putting your username then your vote is deleted, because if you don't put # before your username then it will restart the votes back to one for the next person who vote and then it can alter votes. note: This doesn't apply to the "comments" section but if a user forgot to put his/her name then just let them, you, or someone else put there username in.
Proposer: Zero777 (talk)
Deadline: September 5, 2009, 20:00
Support
- Zero777 (talk) I am Zero! (creator) The last one pass very successfully, because think about it why make a section if you are not going to support it yourself? There's no reason to oppose since if it pass then it will make a turn for the better for everybody. This proposal will make the pages I just said more organized. Zero signing out.
- YellowYoshi127 (talk) Yoshi! I don't like it when a niminator doesn't support it himself but I see no real reason to have to add creator after your user name as above it usually says nominated by.
Oppose
- Time Q (talk): You want to remove votes that lack the # symbol? I'm not sure about the other rules you're proposing, but that's going too far. You can always forget to put this symbol. There's absolutely no reason to punish anyone by removing their votes. IMO, removing someone's vote is much worse than forgetting to put a single symbol. This is out of all proportion.
- Tucayo (talk) - Per TimeQ. I dont clearly understand it....
- Luigifreak (talk) - Per all. We dont need to delete those right off the bat, it's often just a misunderstanding and once the user is told, he/she will almost always change it.
- Yoshario (talk) - Per Time Q
- Itachi 96 (talk) Per Time Q.
- Marioguy1 (talk) - Per Above. Other users like you or me could just insert that symbol there. It would be just as easy as deleting the vote. Maybe even easier because last time I checked, the # symbol was shift-3 and to delete a vote it would take about ten deletes/backspaces or a shift-end-delete (all of which have more keys than a shift-3).
- Randoman123456789 (talk) - Per all.
Comment
I am Zero! Oh ya, I forgot that part, I was thinking of the poll selection page. Zero signing out. Zero777 (talk)
I agree with the no name no vote part but I dont think the no username of creator is pointless. Don't most creators vote after they already have published it? Betaman (talk)
Removals
'None at the moment.
Splits & Merges
Merge Rope Snake with Lucas
I propose we merge Rope Snake with Lucas. Because, do we really need an article on Lucas' grab move? I don't think so.
Proposer: Lemmy Koopa Fan (talk)
Deadline: September 6, 2009, 15:00
Support
- Marioguy1 (talk) - We have no articles on Iceberg or Palutena's Army and they are most definitely more important than snake-move-thing as they are final smashes. Why create an inconsistency in the articles just redirect the page to [[Lucas#snake-move-thing]].
- Lemmy Koopa Fan (talk) I forgot to vote first so per me and Marioguy1.
- Edofenrir (talk) Would make sense...
- Cobold (talk) as all special moves have already been merged, these should go as well.
Oppose
Comments
Will we do the same for Hookshot? - Cobold (talk)
- I'd say yes.
- And please let's not forget Grapple Beam - Edofenrir (talk)
Since most of the moves were merged to main articles, there's no doubt on moving these info to the corresponding pages... Coincollector (talk)
Changes
Hello,
I am currently working on some articles related to Wario Land 2. While doing this I noticed something.
Maybe while exploring the Wiki, you came across this Navigation Template. It lists all the members of the Brown-/Black Sugar Pirates, a band of thieves that oppose Wario. I am not doubting its usefulness, but there are some things about that template that don't seem right.
Therefore I would like to suggest the removal of Giant Bee, Stonefish, King Bubble and Grabber Ghost from the template, since they are obviously not members of said group. King Bubble and Grabber Ghost can be seen abducting Captain Syrup, what proves that they are not members of the pirates (they wouldn't attack their leader). And Giant Bee and Stonefish show no sign of being members of the Pirates as well (no pirate-like traits like bandannas etc.). It is more likely that they're just plain animals and Wario just happened to cross their territory.
So that's why I suggest their removal from that template. Please let me know what you think about this.
Proposer: Edofenrir (talk)
Deadline: September 6, 2009, 15:00
Support
Oppose
Comment
Miscellaneous
None at the moment.