User talk:35.136.168.227

Edit summaries

This is an improper use of an edit summary. There's no reason for the angry comment like that in the edit summary. While, yes, it is disappointing that they had to go back on this, I don't recall them actually promising adding Mario in Ralph Breaks the Internet. Just that they'd work on it. 18:04, 27 October 2018 (EDT) I am sorry I am not trying to excuse my actions but basically my anger has gotten the best of me unfortunately this comment came too late since I just wrote another angry comment but on another note however that Rich Moore basically lied since he did promise it look up Rich Moore promising he would be in the sequel if you don't believe me and it's very fishy that they apparently couldn't get Mario in especially since there are Mario related elements in the movie and I do not believe that Disney and Nintendo have a bad relationship right now. Moments like these are reasons why I wish I owned the rights to these characters because then things like this wouldn't have happened (at least not as often as they do now) just sayin

You don't need to file any papers to make a reference to something, or at least I don't think you do (otherwise there'd be a lot of companies in trouble). So things like the ? Block and Super Mushroom and maybe sound effects can be used, but they had to grab the license for Bowser. Felix even name-dropped Mario in the first movie, which I don't think requires a license either. Mario is quite possibly the most expensive video game character to use in something non-Mario related, and there is also the Illumination movie coming up. Because of those, I honestly didn't expect the idea of adding Mario to Ralph Breaks the Internet to go through, though I was hoping. 18:18, 27 October 2018 (EDT)

I see what your saying though at least some of points still stand nonetheless.