Talk:Millennium Star

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Millennium Star article. It is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Comments such as "Mario is my favorite character" are not allowed and will be removed on sight. Please use the Mario Boards or our Discord server to talk about Millennium Star.

If you do have a question or comment about the article, please remember to sign your edit with ~~~~.

(First topic)[edit]

I believe both the real and fake Millenium Star articles should be merged together. They have the same name, and the article could simply indicate there are two entities called the Millenium Star, one being an imposter, the other being legit. I think the articles would flow better merged. -- Son of Suns I agree with Son of Suns. That makes a lot of sense. -- Greentoad

"Ho-ho-ho."[edit]

Who is this guy, Santa Claus? Surely there's a better quote we can use that shows his personality better. EDIT: "What an untidy mess! You cannot be called the greatest Superstar in the universe." could work. Alex95sig1.pngAlex95sig2.png 14:01, 13 February 2018 (EST)

Split the "true" Millennium Star?[edit]

This page rather awkwardly describes two separate, completely different characters of the same name in the same game. The "main" one that is large, silver with brows and a mustache, and appears 95% of the game is the "fake" one, while the other one that is small, white, and only appears in the ending as a plot twist is the "true" one. Later games that bring up the character only do so in the context of the host (ie, the fake one), so it should definitely keep the "main" page, but the true one is a completely different character whose only similarity is the name and "being a star." Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 20:12, May 12, 2026 (UTC)

Yeah I agree. I really think that splitting the two Millenium Stars into the Fake and Real would be a good idea. Kirby the Formling (talk) 20:26, May 12, 2026 (UTC)
Likewise. Perhaps it may not end up being a very large article, but it'll certainly be a better arrangement than trying to document two characters on one page and not giving proper coverage to either of them. (Which is a trend I've been encountering in a surprising number of articles lately.) Wandering Poplin (talk) 20:38, May 12, 2026 (UTC)
Agreed. Even if the article turns out to be very short, it would help with organization. I need more wrenches... Dive Rocket Launcher 13:32, May 24, 2026 (UTC)