MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Nintendo Switch: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Tag: Mobile edit |
Tag: Mobile edit |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
===[[Nintendo Switch]]=== | ===[[Nintendo Switch]]=== | ||
{{FANOMSTAT | {{FANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=18:00, April 18, 2025 (EDT) | |nominated= 18:00, April 18, 2025 (EDT) | ||
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2012) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2012) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 18:01, April 18, 2025
Nintendo Switch
Support
- Yoshi18 (talk) The Switch is at its end of it's lifetime and I think it's worth to become a featured article now, since there's not much more to add to it. The Switch's article on our wiki is one of our most sourced articles, having 80 sources. When a page has 80 sources, it of course also goes very in-depth over the console. I have read the Manual of Style very carefully, as well as the Switch's article itself and removed the 2 dead links. From everything I read in the Manual of Style, the Switch follows. It only has unsourced dates, but every console has (even the ones that are Featured Articles). So it's practically nothing to worry about. As I already said, it passed the Manual of Style very easily and has no red links or improvement tags, is of reasonable length and uses much images. The intro paragraph perfectly explains a little history about the Switch, before going more in-depth to it in the following paragraph. I really feel like, now that the Switch is at the end of its lifetime and practically no new information can be added, it deserves a place in the Featured Article family.
