User talk:Rendumguy

Signing

Hello, Rendumguy. Please remember to sign your comments on talk pages by typing four tildes at the end: ~~~~

Mario JC 06:35, July 23, 2025 (EDT)

Article writing and images

When creating articles, please remember to add the game navigation template and applicable categories to them. When adding an image to an article on its own, it should be as a thumbnail (e.g. [[File:DKB Peekabruiser Splash Screen.png|thumb]]). However, since the image you uploaded is better suited for an infobox, it should be resized instead (e.g. [[File:DKB Peekabruiser Splash Screen.png|250px]]) The multiple sections are also not necessary since they contain such little information on their own. I have made such changes in Peekabruiser's article.

In terms of image files, please remember to rename them to be more appropriate. "File:Screenshot 2025-08-08 at 17-13-04 (19) Donkey Kong Bananza Peekabruiser Boss Fight 4K - YouTube.png" is both too long for a name and contains irrelevant information. For the Aboutfile template, remove any parameters that you do not intend on changing from the default text. Finally, please remember to add image categories. In the case of the image you just uploaded, [[Category:Donkey Kong Bananza screenshots]] should be added. - RHG1951 (talk) 23:07, August 20, 2025 (EDT)

OK, thanks for the advice

Rendumguy (talk) 12:47, August 21, 2025 (EDT)

Your last article was again missing navboxes and categories (these links at the bottom of the page). Remember to add them for future articles. You can read MarioWiki:Manual of Style for more info. Mario JC 21:27, August 21, 2025 (EDT)

Please stop forgetting navboxes and categories for new articles on the Super Mario Wiki. This isn't a warning, and it's possible that you made a mistake by accident or without realizing it; this is simply a reminder for your information. If the action continues, then a warning will be issued. Thanks for reading and keep contributing. If you feel this reminder was undeserved, you may appeal it.

Remember to also italicise the game title. Again, I suggest reading the Manual of Style, or looking at other articles as examples. Mario JC 22:02, September 11, 2025 (EDT)

Preview reminder

Hello, Rendumguy. When editing, if you'd like to see how your edits affect a page, use the "Show preview" button next to the "Save changes" button. This allows you to check over your edits for any errors and make any additional changes or fixes before you save, which will prevent edits from flooding the page history and recent changes. (If you are on mobile, make sure to check the preview page thoroughly before proceeding to save.) Please try to avoid making excessive, consecutive edits to a single page within a short timespan and instead limit them to as few as possible.

— eviemaybe (talk) 23:11, March 21, 2026 (UTC)

Italics

Hello, Rendumguy! Thanks for your contributions. When writing titles for media like games, films, TV shows, and publications, please remember to italicize them. This is done by placing two straight apostrophes (not quotation marks or curly apostrophes) on both sides of the title, or clicking on the I icon above the text box and typing out the title. For example, typing out ''[[Super Mario Bros.]]'' generates Super Mario Bros. If you are using a device that uses curly ("smart") punctuation, you may need to disable this function in your device's settings to be able to type out the correct apostrophes.

Mario JC 15:25, April 12, 2026 (UTC)

Warning

This is a warning to stop your inappropriate behavior (counter-productive edit warring and poor conduct) on the Super Mario Wiki. Please adhere to the rules or you will be blocked from editing this site. If you feel this warning was undeserved, you may appeal it.

The way you conducted yourself on both Terrormisu's talk page and King Hisstocrat's page is inexcusable. Edit warring even after multiple people tell you to stop trying to add a statement that is a wild extrapolation to make (especially since Mario Tennis Fever implies that the "suggestion" is entirely bogus, a fact that the people you were edit warring with expressly called attention to) is already against the wiki rules. In addition, a lot of your attempts to justify these additions, both in edit reasons and on talk pages, feel incredibly circular, with "conversations" involving them feeling less like you're discussing things with other users, and just that you're talking at other users, resulting in an incredibly confusing exchange that just disrupts other people's attempts to join the conversation. What happened on both of these pages absolutely shouldn't have happened, let alone been allowed to escalate to those points that admin intervention was necessary.

In the future, if another editor disagrees with something you've added, bring it up to them, and listen to them, even if they say that they still disagree. Edit warring them, or flooding the talk page with wholly new sections dedicated solely to poorly thought-out counter-arguments that, most of the time, are already explained by simply reading other users' reasons for or against a decision, are not proper ways to conduct yourself. ~Camwoodstock ( talk ☯ contribs ) 22:52, May 14, 2026 (UTC)

If that's the case, that the "suggestion is entirely bogus"then you should remove the reference to the eight headed snake on that page. You're gonna allow the suggestion that it's referencing an eight headed snake but not allow a suggestion that the snake is connected to the others, when the article itself says the snake might be inspired by an eight headed snake and the game files call them "tentancles".

A "bogus suggestion" is saying that the boss was originally Gooper Blooper based on absolutely nothing.

If that was edit warring the. both parties were edit warring, there's no direct response to the messages made in edits And "my behavior in the Terrormisu article was inexcusable"?

How? First off, none of the arguments that the character isn't based on Peach make any sense, like I said, it very very clearly is based on Peach, because this is the Mario franchise, it's like saying that the first from Wario Land 1 isn't based on a Koopa just because there are no other Koopas in the game. It's nonsense, the character is too well known to accidentally make a lookalike in the same overall series.

Second, I edit saying "this is similar to one thing", and the edit is reverted because someone says "you can't do that it's not a reference ". Sure, I said it was a reference, in a completely different comment section, the edit I made had nothing to do with a reference, it had to do with a similarity that the other editors acknowledged by copy pasting the emotion article to Terrormisu. The justification of the edit isn't actually addressing the issue of the edit, so of course I'd revert it.

"And flooding the talk page with poorly thought out counter arguments"? No. If you misinterpret the proposal that never mentions "references" and use that in your argument, that's going to be criticized. It's a bad argument.

Rendumguy (talk) 11:08, May 15, 2026 (UTC)

The difference between "both parties" here is you are one person and there were several different people reverting you. The latter isn't edit-warring. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 11:36, May 15, 2026 (UTC)

Christ, my goodness, man. Just because the source material doesn't entirely 100% line up with the subject referencing it, doesn't automatically mean it's not noteworthy anymore. It's still noteworthy to mention that King Hisstocrat and his underlings might be based on the Yamata no Orochi, since there's still eight snake heads, and the internal files of TentackHead and TentackTentacle does suggest an initial connection. The fact that there's no canonical evidence (anymore) that they share the same body doesn't automatically make these other points moot. This is why we're still allowing Terrormisu resembling Peach to be mentioned on her page, even if she isn't actually based on Peach at all: it's still noteworthy.
Coincidentally, there's a Pokémon inspired by the Yamata no Orochi as well: Hydreigon. That doesn't 100% match with the Yamata no Orochi either, since it has three heads instead of eight. Yet, we do have confirmation that Hydreigon was inspired by the creature (and even that it was originally supposed to be a tank), unlike your claim that Terrormisu is 100% based on Peach.
Note that this doesn't suddenly give your "Terrormisu's masks are based on Peach's vibes in SSP" any credence, though. Both share origins with the kidoairaku from East Asian culture, but since Super Princess Peach and Wario: Master of Disguise are released about a year and three months apart, and developed by completely different game studios, it's much safer to just go with the kidoairaku mention instead, and regard the SPP thing as a coincidence at best. I don't care if both games share one producer and one director, that's really not enough evidence to suggest the latter is a reference to the former. At least Peach herself is a character that was a 21 years and four months old at WMOD's release (also, when you say Terrormisu is based on Peach, I notice that you keep specifically talking about the battle form with the ballerina dress, not even the appearance where she actually wears a pink gown that resembles Peach's gown much closer; not to mention that there's also her red gown and her actual demonic form, which don't match with Peach at all?) rend (talk) (edits) 13:13, May 15, 2026 (UTC)

Do people not realize that I never was talking about NPC Terrormis? I know she had a less Peach-like design than Boss Terrormisu. When referring to Terromisu's resemblance, I always was referring to boss Terrormisu, because boss Terrormisu is a more detailed sprite with obvious similarities to Peach. I never mentioned the NPC form because it doesn't really matter in the conversation.

Also, you got what you wanted, even when the arguments of reference or similarities are so disconnected, why are you still complaining?

Jesus Christ, my goodness, man. The only thing notable about Yamata no Orochi is that its heads are connected. Hydreigin's heads are connected. I'm literally just saying, hey if it's based on Yamata no Orochi, MAYBE the boss' heads are also connected, I'm not saying it's a fact, I'm saying we never see the bottom of the snakes, they're called tentacles in the file, die immediately at the same time with the boss, and that we don't know if they're separated or not.

Rendumguy (talk) 15:04, May 15, 2026 (UTC)

The word "maybe" is speculative. As much as your claims could possibly be true, there is no definite evidence, and speculation is not allowed on this wiki. That's why your edits were constantly reverted/undone. Mari0fan100 (talk) 17:06, May 15, 2026 (UTC)

...All we're saying is, this response, with spewing walls of text talking at, but never listening, to people with not thought out counter-arguments that are already counter-countered by simply reading what people said the first time, and hoping to get your way by attrition and drowning people in walls of text, is the exact thing we issued the warning for. And having an attitude about it by parroting Arend's personal indigence back at him and giving a snide "you got what you wanted, so why are you still complaining?" is not an improvement of conduct in the least.

If this behavior persists, we may have to upgrade the warning even further, and if it persists after that, a ban may be on the table. Please actually read and internalize what people are telling you, even if they disagree with you. This is a collaborative writing effort, not a war of attrition. ~Camwoodstock ( talk ☯ contribs ) 17:25, May 15, 2026 (UTC)