MarioWiki:Proposals

Current time: Tuesday, November 12th, 14:13 GMT

Proposals can be new features, the removal of previously-added features that have tired out, or new policies that must be approved via consensus before any action is taken. Voting periods last for two weeks. Any user can support or oppose, but must have a strong reason for doing so (not, e.g., "I like this idea!"). All proposals must be approved by a majority of voters, including proposals with more than two options. For past proposals, see the proposal archive and the talk page proposal archive.

A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed using the code {{User|User name}}.

How to

Rules

1. If users have an idea about improving the wiki or managing its community, but feel that they need community approval before acting upon that idea, they may make a proposal about it. They must have a strong argument supporting their idea and be willing to discuss it in detail with the other users, who will then vote about whether or not they think the idea should be used. Proposals should include links to all relevant pages and writing guidelines. Proposals must include a link to the draft page. Any pages that would be largely affected by the proposal should be marked with {{proposal notice}}.
2. Only registered, autoconfirmed users can create, comment in, or vote on proposals and talk page proposals. Users may vote for more than one option, but they may not vote for every option available.
3. Proposals end at the end of the day (23:59) two weeks after voting starts (all times GMT).
   • For example, if a proposal is added at any time on Monday, August 1, 2011, the voting starts immediately and the deadline is two weeks later on Monday, August 15, at 23:59 GMT.
4. Every vote should have a strong, sensible reason accompanying it. Agreeing with a previously mentioned reason given by another user is accepted (including "per" votes), but tangential comments, heavy sarcasm, and other misleading or irrelevant quips are just as invalid as providing no reason at all.
5. Users who feel that certain votes were cast in bad faith or which truly have no merit can address the votes in the comments section. Users can ask a voter to clarify their position, point out mistakes or flaws in their arguments, or call for the outright removal of the vote if it lacks sufficient reasoning. Users may not remove or alter the content of anyone else's votes. Voters can remove or rewrite their own vote(s) at any time, but the final decision to remove another user's vote lies solely with the administrators.
   • Users can also use the comments section to bring up any concerns or mistakes in regards to the proposal itself. In such cases, it's important the proposer addresses any concerns raised as soon as possible. Even if the supporting side might be winning by a wide margin, that should be no reason for such questions to be left unanswered. They may point out any missing details that might have been overlooked by the proposer, so it's a good idea as the proposer to check them frequently to achieve the most accurate outcome possible.
6. If a user makes a vote and is subsequently blocked for any amount of time, their vote is removed. However, if the block ends before the proposal ends, then the user in question holds the right to re-cast their vote. If a proposer is blocked, their vote is removed and "(banned)" is added next to their name in the "Proposer:" line of the proposal, which runs until its deadline as normal. If the proposal passes, it falls to the supporters of the idea to enact any changes in a timely manner.
7. No proposal can overturn the decision of a previous proposal that is less than 4 weeks (28 days) old.
8. Any proposal where none of the options have at least four votes will be extended for another week. If after three extensions, no options have at least four votes, the proposal will be listed as "NO QUORUM." The original proposer then has the option to relist said proposal to generate more discussion.
9. If a proposal reaches its deadline and there is a tie for first place, then the proposal is extended for another week.
10. If a proposal reaches its deadline and the first place option is ahead of the second place option by three or more votes, then the first place option must have over 50% approval to win. If the margin is only one or two votes, then the first place option must have at least 60% approval to win. If the required approval threshold is not met, then the proposal is extended for another week.
    • Use the {{proposal check}} tool to automate this calculation; see the template page for usage instructions and examples.
11. Proposals can be extended a maximum of three times. If a consensus has not been reached by the fourth deadline, then the proposal fails and can only be re-proposed after four weeks (at the earliest).
12. All proposals are archived. The original proposer must take action accordingly if the outcome of the proposal dictates it. If it requires the help of an administrator, the proposer can ask for that help.
13. If the administrators deem a proposal unnecessary or potentially detrimental to the upkeep of the Super Mario Wiki, they have the right to remove it at any time.
14. Proposals can only be rewritten or canceled by their proposer within the first six days of their creation. However, proposers can request that their proposal be canceled by an administrator at any time, provided they have a valid reason for it. Please note that canceled proposals must also be archived.
15. Unless there is major disagreement about whether certain content should be included, there should not be proposals about creating, expanding, rewriting, or otherwise fixing up pages. To organize efforts about improving articles on neglected or completely missing subjects, try setting up a collaboration thread on the forums.
16. Proposals cannot be made about promotions and demotions. Users can only be promoted and demoted by the will of the administration.
17. No joke proposals. Proposals are serious wiki matters and should be handled professionally. Joke proposals will be deleted on sight.
18. Proposals must have a status quo option (e.g. Oppose, Do nothing) unless the status quo itself violates policy.

Basic proposal and support/oppose format

This is an example of what your proposal must look like, if you want it to be acknowledged. If you are inexperienced or unsure how to set up this format, simply copy the following and paste it into the fitting section. Then replace the [subject] - variables with information to customize your proposal, so it says what you wish. If you insert the information, be sure to replace the whole variable including the squared brackets, so "[insert info here]" becomes "This is the inserted information", not "[This is the inserted information]". Proposals presenting multiple alternative courses of action can have more than two voting options, but what each voting section is supporting must be clearly defined. Such options should also be kept to a minimum, and if something comes up in the comments, the proposal can be amended as necessary.

---

===[insert a title for your proposal here]===
[describe what issue this proposal is about and what changes you think should be made to improve how the wiki handles that issue]

'''Proposer''': {{User|[enter your username here]}}<br>
'''Deadline''': [insert a deadline here, 14 days after the proposal was created, at 23:59 GMT, in the format: "November 12, 2024, 23:59 GMT"]

====Support====
#{{User|[enter your username here]}} [make a statement indicating that you support your proposal]

====Oppose====

====Comments====

---

Users will now be able to vote on your proposal, until the set deadline is reached. Remember, you are a user as well, so you can vote on your own proposal just like the others.

To support, or oppose, just insert "#{{User|[add your username here]}}" at the bottom of the section of your choice. Just don't forget to add a valid reason for your vote behind that tag if you are voting on another user's proposal. If you are voting on your own proposal, you can just say "Per my proposal".

Talk page proposals

Proposals concerning a single page or a limited group of pages are held on the most relevant talk page regarding the matter. Proposals dealing with a large amount of splits, merges, or deletions across the wiki should still be held on this page.

For a list of all settled talk page proposals, see MarioWiki:Proposals/TPP archive and Category:Settled talk page proposals.

Rules

1. All active talk page proposals must be listed below in chronological order (new proposals go at the bottom) using {{TPP discuss}}. Include a brief description of the proposal while also mentioning any pages affected by it, a link to the talk page housing the discussion, and the deadline. If the proposal involves a page that is not yet made, use {{fake link}} to communicate its title in the description. Linking to pages not directly involved in the talk page proposal is not recommended, as it clutters the list with unnecessary links. Place {{TPP}} under the section's header, and once the proposal is over, replace the template with {{settled TPP}}.
2. All rules for talk page proposals are the same as mainspace proposals (see the "How to" section above), with the exceptions made by Rules 3 and 4 as follows:
3. The talk page proposal must pertain to the subject page of the talk page it is posted on.
4. When a talk page proposal passes, it should be removed from this list and included in the list under the "Unimplemented proposals" section until the proposed changes have been enacted.

List of ongoing talk page proposals

• Determine what to do with Jamboree Buddy (discuss) Deadline: November 12, 2024, 23:59 GMT
• Split Cursed Mushroom from Poison Mushroom (discuss) Deadline: November 12, 2024, 23:59 GMT
• Merge Orbs that share names with pre-existing Mario Party series items with those items (discuss) Deadline: November 14, 2024, 23:59 GMT
• Create a number of articles for special buildings in Super Mario Run (discuss) Deadline: November 15, 2024, 23:59 GMT
• Consider Deep Cheeps' appearance in the Super Mario Maker series a design cameo rather than a full appearance (without Blurps being affected) (discuss) Deadline: November 15, 2024, 23:59 GMT
• Merge Mushroom, Dash Mushroom, and most of Super Mushroom (discuss) Deadline: November 18, 2024, 23:59 GMT
• Expand and rename List of characters by game (discuss) Deadline: November 20, 2024, 23:59 GMT
• Decide whether to create articles for Ashita ni Nattara and Banana Tengoku and/or include them on List of Donkey Kong Country (television series) songs (discuss) Deadline: November 23, 2024, 23:59 GMT

Unimplemented proposals

Proposals

Break alphabetical order in enemy lists to list enemy variants below their base form, EvieMaybe (ended May 21, 2024)

Standardize sectioning for Super Mario series game articles, Nintendo101 (ended July 3, 2024)

^ NOTE: Not yet integrated for the Super Mario Maker titles, Super Mario Run, and Super Mario Bros. Wonder.

Create new sections for gallery pages to cover "unused/pre-release/prototype/etc." graphics separate from the ones that appear in the finalized games, Doc von Schmeltwick (ended September 2, 2024)

Add film and television ratings to Template:Ratings, TheUndescribableGhost (ended October 1, 2024)

Use the classic and classic-link templates when discussing classic courses in Mario Kart Tour, YoYo (ended October 2, 2024)

Split articles for the alternate-named reskins from All Night Nippon: Super Mario Bros., Doc von Schmeltwick (ended October 3, 2024)

Clarify coverage of the Super Smash Bros. series, Doc von Schmeltwick (ended October 17, 2024)

Remove all subpage and redirect links from all navigational templates, JanMisali (ended October 31, 2024)

Prioritize MESEN/NEStopia palette for NES sprites and screenshots, Doc von Schmeltwick (ended November 3, 2024)

Stop considering reused voice clips as references (usually), Waluigi Time (ended November 8, 2024)

Talk page proposals

Split all the clothing, Doc von Schmeltwick (ended September 12, 2021)

Split machine parts, Robo-Rabbit, and flag from Super Duel Mode, Doc von Schmeltwick (ended September 30, 2022)

Make bestiary list pages for the Minion Quest and Bowser Jr.'s Journey modes, Doc von Schmeltwick (ended January 11, 2024)

Allow separate articles for Diddy Kong Pilot (2003)'s subjects, Doc von Schmeltwick (ended August 3, 2024)

Split Banana Peel from Banana, Doc von Schmeltwick (ended September 18, 2024)

Merge Spiked Thwomp with Thwomp, Blinker (ended November 2, 2024)

Writing guidelines

None at the moment.

New features

A Hamburger in Super Smash Bros. Brawl For Everyone

A Hamburger in Super Smash Bros. Brawl.

I was sifting through new files the other day, and I happen to think "What could make this job better?" Well, the obvious answer was A Hamburger in Super Smash Bros. Brawl.

So, I'm proposing that we have A Hamburger in Super Smash Bros. Brawl available to any and all of our editors 24/7. Flavors include pie flavor and freedom (due to monitory constraints, it might be wise to limit ourselves to just those flavors). Further, these A Hamburger in Super Smash Bros. Brawls would be made and hand delivered by the A Hamburger in Super Smash Bros. Brawl Button, using its, and I quote, "1337 wiki skillz".

Think about this for a moment. If out active users had a hot, fresh A Hamburger straight from Super Smash Bros. Brawl hand delivered to them while they edit....well, just think of the high quality articles that we would gain. A full, satisfied Hamburger in Super Smash Bros. Brawl is a power force.

Proposer: Hewbert P. Edia (talk)
Deadline: November 3, 2024, 15:00 EDT

Delicious A Hamburger in Super Smash Bros. Brawl

1. Hewbert P. Edia (talk)

No A Hamburger in Super Smash Bros. Brawl for You (AKA TOO MUCH SMASH COVERAGE)

1. Hewberger (talk) - This is pure nonsense.
2. Pink Donkey Kong Sr. (talk) hotpink

Removals

[insert a title for your proposal here]

[describe what issue this proposal is about and what changes you think should be made to improve how the wiki handles that issue]

Proposer: {{User|[enter your username here]}}
Deadline: [insert a deadline here, 7 days after the proposal was created (14 for writing guidelines and talk page proposals), at 23:59 GMT, in the format: "April 1, 2024, 23:59 GMT"]

Support

1. Koopa con Carne (talk) Hard agree from me. Such an attitude is of utmost salience in a community and should be deeply and proactively fostered to ensure not just the growth of this knowledge base, but the synergy between the registered userbase and readers.
2. Pink Donkey Kong Sr. (talk) hotpink
3. Yoshi Hater (talk) Such perfectly constructed arguments you got there! I agree with everything you said!
4. Arend (talk) [make a statement indicating that you support your proposal]

Oppose

1. Hewbert P. Edia (talk) OK, I'm really confused. I don't understand this logic at all. How could anyone come to that conclusion with this little official evidence? And what would happen to pages like this if this dumb proposal were to pass? Hard oppose from me, let's keep this wiki reliable as a source of information. EDIT: For some extra clarity, I want to be very clear that I still oppose this proposal. It feels hastily written and doesn't fully consider the whole situation, so the result would be pretty messy. I might support an option to only make half of the changes if it was added, though, since I can somewhat see the argument for those.

Comments

@Hewbert P. Edia the proposal literally states that the article you mention won't be affected. -- KOOPA CON CARNE 09:19, April 1, 2024 (EDT)

My bad, I should've read the proposal more closely. I'm still opposing, though, because I still think the idea of just suddenly making a change like this is pretty stupid. I've edited my vote to be clearer. Hewbert P. Edia (talk) 09:41, April 1, 2024 (EDT)

Changes

Trim Super Smash Bros. navigational templates

Over time, this wiki has, with good reason, significantly reduced its coverage of the Super Smash Bros. series. However, as has been the subject of multiple other proposals, there are a lot of vestigial remnants left over from when Smash still received full coverage.

One of the most prominent and blatant cases of this is found in the Super Smash Bros. navigational templates, namely Template:SSB, Template:SSB moves, Template:SSBM, Template:SSBM moves, Template:SSB4, Template:SSB4 moves, Template:SSBU, and Template:SSBU moves.

Each of these templates contains links to subjects that no longer have dedicated articles, and take the reader to a subsection of a list article instead. The "move" templates are especially rough, since the majority of Smash Bros. moves are no longer even covered on the articles that these links redirect to. I propose that these navigational templates should be significantly trimmed down, much like the ongoing efforts to clean up the various "series" categories.

Furthermore, without the unnecessary links to subjects that no longer are within this wiki's scope, having moves in a separate template from the main navigational template for those games may no longer be necessary, so it might also make sense to remove the "move" templates entirely, moving the links to Super Mario-related Smash Bros. moves to the main Smash navigational templates.

Proposer: JanMisali (talk)
Deadline: April 3, 2024, 23:59 GMT

Remove all redirect links from Super Smash Bros. navigational templates

1. JanMisali (talk) Second choice, per proposal.

Remove all redirect links from Super Smash Bros. navigational templates and delete the "move" templates entirely

1. JanMisali (talk) First choice, per proposal.
2. Camwoodstock (talk) Honestly surprised this hasn't been done sooner. Per all.
3. Koopa con Carne (talk) per proposal
4. SolemnStormcloud (talk) Per proposal.
5. Super Mario RPG (talk) Please do. The excessive amounts of Super Smash Bros. coverage is a huge pet peeve of mine, since it hinders accessibility for Super Mario content.
6. LadySophie17 (talk) Per all, thank you very much.

Comments

You forgot the navigational templates for Super Smash Bros. Brawl, Template:SSBB and Template:SSBB moves. SolemnStormcloud (talk) 12:11, March 27, 2024 (EDT)

Ah, so I did. Yes, those would also be covered by this. jan Misali (talk · contributions) 13:15, March 27, 2024 (EDT)

Forbid the use of images without captioning them

This proposal aims to ban the use of images without captions, both in text and galleries. It's for a similar reason as why one should add a reason when adding a maintenance template, and without it, unfamiliar readers may ask themselves, "What's the subject? What does it do? What's it trying to illustrate?"

I looked around for an example, and I'll use the Icicle page. Quite a few sections add sprites without captioning them. While the section heading alone would be enough to suggest that it's a sprite from the game, additional context could be at risk of being left out. Mario Bros. has been re-released many times, so when I see the icicle sprite, I may ask myself, "What version is it from? The arcade? The NES? The Game Boy Advance?" While it's true that sprites can't easily display captions, due to being small images, there could be a way to make it easier to caption them.

This problem also applies to infoboxes. On the Itsunomanika Heihō page, what's going on in the infobox image? There's so many things in it, and it doesn't make clear who Itsunomanika Heihō is, which is the Shy Guy.

On a bit of a side note, too many articles have images that feel added in the text just for the sake of adding images, and captionless images seem among them. Why does the Lubba page have three images in the Super Mario Galaxy 2 section? Are they essential enough to be included or could they just be addendums to a gallery? Two of the images are just Lubba saying a quote, something that's hardly as much of interest as, let's say, Mario's first meeting with Lubba. Should this proposal pass, perhaps a separate proposal, or a precedent, could be set for tightening the use of images in article sections unless they are plot-essential, show a major difference between games, or for historical context, such as when something first appeared.

Proposer: Super Mario RPG (talk)
Deadline: April 3, 2024, 23:59 GMT

Support

#Super Mario RPG (talk) As proposer.

Oppose

1. Tails777 (talk) Forbidding is a strong conclusion if you ask me. Simply adding a caption or moving images to a gallery is enough rather than just outright forbidding a captionless image.
2. JanMisali (talk) Per Tails777. This would be a pretty big policy change, and it would be better to handle it on a case-by-case basis.
3. Nightwicked Bowser (talk) It's really not a big deal at all if there are a few images without captions. If you think one is necessary, then there's nothing stopping you from adding one but making this a strict policy is going too far.
4. Camwoodstock (talk) Per all; we really ought to take these on a case-by-case basis, as while some of these instances are not clear like the Mario Bros. Icicle image... Other captionless images on that very same article, like the Mario Clash Icicle are very much clear enough as-is since Clash only ever had one platform it released on. And the Itsunomanika Heihō infobox really just needs a new image outright if you ask us; if the image used cropped out the Bandit and Baby Mario and giant in-game arrow pointing at them, leaving the Shy Guy on Yoshi's back as the focal point, you'd fix the vast majority of the clarity issues. (of course, don't go updating the image itself, as it's used on other articles, instead this'd have to be a new image.)
5. PnnyCrygr (talk) Best add a caption to the image sans caption, or just move it to a gallery page. Per all.
6. Scrooge200 (talk) Per all, a blanket ban on uncaptioned images would do more harm than good. It'd be better to just fix the cases that are unclear.
7. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) Abso-huckin'-lutely not. The amount of times I've had to remove a caption from a tiny, tiny image that can't even support a caption I can't even count.
8. YoYo (talk) oh please. i dont think i need to explain - but the comment below does perfectly.
9. Hewer (talk) Per all, some images needing captions doesn't mean they all do.
10. ThePowerPlayer (talk) Per all. Also see the comments; trying to add a caption to a tiny game sprite says it all.
11. Arend (talk) Yeah no, per all. Some images are just too tiny to add a caption to (tiny images being something this Icicle article that's being brought up is chock full of), but also too essential for a section to be outright removed. Doc perfectly demonstrates that in the comment section.
12. Mario (talk) The ideal way to proceed with this is either make caption interesting or remove the caption and let the image do the talking.
13. MegaBowser64 (talk) We should be working on captioning images that need it, not putting an umbrella ban over every image! This idea is more destructive that constructive, images are always good for context, even if they don't have written context themselves.
14. FanOfYoshi (talk) As Don Lino from Shark Tale said it best... "Are you kidding me, are you outta your MIND?!". Per all.
15. Nintendo101 (talk) Image captions are generally helpful, but one would find that published textbooks do not even do this consistently, and for good reason. An image can sometimes be confidently contextualized just by the text it is next to. To impose a rule like this can potentially worsen some articles. Additionally, I think a rule like this is too heavy-handed and weakens our editorial discretion.
16. Mister Wu (talk) As noted by Doc, our current modus operandi with the sprites directly collides with this policy, and redoing all the sprites at double or triple the resolution in every axis just to make the caption readable is time consuming and arguably not even that correct in terms of presenting what the sprite originally looked like.

Comments

In what universe is this even remotely acceptable? You can't even read it!

Please tell me how the image to the left is ideal. Because that's what this proposal's trying for. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 17:52, March 27, 2024 (EDT)

In my argument in the proposal, I was talking about like a template or something that could use captions in such cases. Multiframe now comes to mind. Super Mario RPG (talk) 18:08, March 27, 2024 (EDT)

Which adds a lot of dead space in the image space itself. I'm fine with using that when they'd blend with the default background (see: Spray Fish), but using them for captions is superfluous. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 18:36, March 27, 2024 (EDT)

Yeah, padded whitespace makes the page look relatively bigger when actually there is no content. It sucks for an article to have superfluous space created by overly long captions in floated tiny images. When creating an article, an article should look nice.  ^P_nn^yC_ryg^r  18:39, March 27, 2024 (EDT)

I want to revisit this proposal to ask about the Icicle example... you say that a lack of caption would result in additional context being left out, to which I ask.... what additional context is there to a sprite of an icicle? Adding captions would simply make it extremely repetitive. "An icicle in Super Mario Bros 3" ... "An icicle in Super Mario World" ... "An icicle in..." and so on. - YoYo (Talk) 10:27, March 29, 2024 (EDT)

TBF the game Mario Bros. has a slew of versions across different systems, so in that particular icicle example it'd be beneficial to state which version it comes from. Not even the sprite's file page states the exact source. If it's a small sprite, surely there's some parameter that widens its frame to fit a caption, right? I could be wrong. -- KOOPA CON CARNE 13:41, March 29, 2024 (EDT)

In that case, alt text would probably be preferable. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 22:22, March 29, 2024 (EDT)

For the Mario Bros. section in specific, I think it would be beneficial to apply a Multiframe in order to include Icicle sprites across all applicable versions of Mario Bros. (similar to what's done with the Super Mario Maker section). We'd probably have to scour through many spritesheets for that, since this wiki seemingly only has the icicle sprite from the arcade version.
As for the other sections that only include a sprite, I agree that including a caption to those might also be too repetitive, on top of the image being too small. rend (talk) (edits) 07:04, March 30, 2024 (EDT)

Allow our BJAODN pages to be Featured Articles

Our Featured Articles have always been about showing everyone what true too standards for quality articles look like. Articles that show the best writing and such. But I also believe that another good way of showing what our best looks like is by also showing what our bad jokes or other deleted nonsense looks like. Therefore I propose that we allow all our bad jokes and other deleted nonsense to have the opportunity to join the ranks as some of our best articles! Sure, they have to pass a nomination first, but let’s give our worst a fighting chance!

Proposer: User:Heads333
Deadline: Tomorrow

Let’s Do It (Support)

1. SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA) (talk) YES PLEASE NO DISCRIMINATION OF PAGES!!
2. Pink Donkey Kong Sr. (talk) hotpink
3. Hewbert P. Edia (talk) How will anyone be able to tell what's good if we keep suppressing the bad?

Are you Crazy? (Oppose)

1. Tails777 (talk) I dunno who this Heads333 guy is, be he might be nuts.

hotpink

hotpink

hotpink

hotpink

hotpink

Proposer: SolemnStormcloud (talk) Pink Donkey Kong Sr. (talk)
Deadline: April 2, 2024, 23:59 GMT

Support

1. Pink Donkey Kong Sr. (talk) hotpink
2. Koopa con Carne (talk) are you strawberry flavored? i want to lick your fur

   This you? Hewbert P. Edia (talk) 09:20, April 1, 2024 (EDT)

3. Yoshi Hater (talk) PINKY! THE PINKEST OF THE PINK!
4. SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA) (talk) GOTTA RESTORE RESTORE RESTORE!!!!!!!!!

Comments

You heard him! Just vote to support and let me free! I don't wanna be Klaptrap food! SolemnStormcloud (talk) 08:45, April 1, 2024 (EDT)

Miscellaneous

Plant a tree for every article we have

Let's face it: the world is dying, thanks to global warming and stuff. Best to prolong the inevitable death as much as we can with all the power we've got, and what better way to do that than planting trees?

This proposal seeks to rectify the pollution from the big corporations by making the Super Mario Wiki the greenest wiki there is... by planting a tree for every single article we have! This would result in approximately 28,521+ fresh trees. Not only that, but I also propose that we should plant a tree for every new article we create as well (hence the + at the aforementioned page count). This would add the incentive to not only create more articles, but also to save the world little by little. Two for the price of one!

Note that I'm only counting content pages here. If we're counting every page (talk pages, user pages, etc.), we'd have to plant approximately 320,705+ trees, which frankly might be a tad too cumbersome. Hence I'm not basing the number of trees to be planted on uploaded files (211,489+), total edit count (4,013,837+) or the amount of words in content pages (13,986,672+) either.

Now who's ready to save the planet?

Proposer: Arend (talk)
Deadline: April 1, 2024, 23:59 GMT

Support

1. Arend (talk) Let's save planet Earth!
2. Tails777 (talk) All for expanding the Woody Woods!
3. Pink Donkey Kong Sr. (talk) hotpink
4. Yoshi Hater (talk) The Lorax would be proud!
5. Nintendo101 (talk)
6. SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA) (talk) SAVE THE TREES, END THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT!

Ban any mention of OOSAPION FROM THE WIKI

That's right! Usapyon is an asshole! Yes, uSAPYON FROM yOKAI wATCH! Why? Because... In 2D artwork, he CONSTANTLY GRINS WITH TEETH, BUT HIS TEETH NEVER EXIST IN 3D/CGI, EVER§ This is simply uncacepptable! Usapyon should be held accountable for this heinous crime on only reserving this to the 2D realm and withholding it in 3D/CGI... Actually, that applies to pretty much ANY Anime character who make facial expressions such as swirly eyes, heart eyes, star eyes and so on and so forth exclusively in 2D and never CGI (the 2D-3D inconsnstency crime) (looking at YOU, Ash Ketchum, my fictional counterpart!) We shall fight for 2D-3D consistency! And if i don't have a picture of Usapyon with teeth in 3D/CGI by tomorrow, i will riot against these characters! You hear me?

Proposer: A passionate hater of the green dinosaur, of course

Ban YOUSAPAION!

1. FanOfYoshi (talk) A rare picture of me (Larry) directly berating Usapyon (pATRICK)
2. Arend (talk) Shouldn't be too difficult since USApyon has barely any relevance here aside from sharing his Japanese name with that of an unrelated enemy that's about a decade older, right?

Ban every anime character who makes these facial expressions in 2D, but never 3D/CGI

1. FanOfYoshi (talk) Same as above, but not limited to just Usapyon

Wario

1. Hewario (talk) Get Wario'd!
2. Tails777 (talk) Wah
3. Pink Donkey Kong Sr. (talk) hotpink
4. SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA) (talk) DOWN WITH ANIME! EVEN WARIO IS BETTER, AND EVEN HE SUCKS, AND THAT'S SAYING SOMETHING!

Trash talk

Need some clarification on the Wario option. It first stated "Ban Wario", now it just says "Wario", and so all supporters are voting it because they want Wario to stay. rend (talk) (edits) 10:22, April 1, 2024 (EDT)

Are the enemies in SMB2 literal créations of Wart, or simply residents of Subcon who happened to have been corrupted by him?

Ok, you might think this debate is stupid as shit, but hear me out: Multiple enemies, such as Shy Guys, Birdoes, Ninjis and many others have reappeared in régions outside of Subcon, and Shy Guys and Snifits existed in Yoshi's Island, a game canonically set long before the events of SMB2, so there's a lingering question: Were the ones seen in SMB2 simply corrupted, or outright créated? Oh and if you're gonna argue that Shy Guys and Bob Ombs popped into existence from short, shallow jars, then maybe Wart tampered with the very way they come into existence?

Option 1: You agree that they used to be residents of Subcon until Wart corrupted them, and that Fry Guy was the only one brought into existence/life.

Option 2: Self-explanatory

Option 3: You can use that as both a vote, and/or comment section.

Proposer: HaterOfYoshi (aka HOY)

They were corrupted!

1. HaterOfYoshi (stalk) You can't convince me otherwise!
2. Pink Donkey Kong Sr. (talk) hotpink
3. SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA) (talk) THEY ALL INNOCENT!

Most of them didn't even exist at all until Wart came along!

1. Arend (talk) The manual literally states that Wart "created monsters by playing with the dream machine", therefor we can conclude that not all of Wart's minions in the game were peaceful residents. The manual also mentions the 8 bits as a "club of evil dreams", which is mentioned in the descriptions for Shyguy and Snifit, which means these are definitely creations of Wart, despite their appearances outside of Subcon (or they were always evil to begin with). Other creatures created by Wart or related to making evil dreams/destroying good dreams are Ninji, Pidgit, Panser, Autobomb, Mouser, and Fryguy, the first two having also appeared outside of Subcon. the ONLY creatures that are confirmed to have been residents prior to Wart's takeover are Albatoss, and maybe Trouter and Ostro. The fact that many of these creature that have been confirmed to be Wart's creations just so happen to have existed outside of Subcon before doesn't mean they were corrupted at all, but rather, it means a retcon instead.