MarioWiki:Proposals
|
Friday, June 13rd, 19:54 GMT |
|
If you would like to get feedback on an idea before formally proposing it here, you may do so on the proposals talk. For talk page proposals, you can discuss the changes on the talk page itself before creating the TPP there.
How to
If someone has an idea about improving the wiki or managing its community, but feel that they need community approval before acting upon that idea, they may make a proposal about it. They must have a strong argument supporting their idea and be willing to discuss it in detail with other users, who will then vote on whether or not they think the idea should be implemented. Proposals should include links to all relevant pages and writing guidelines. Proposals must include a link to the draft page. Any pages that would be largely affected by the proposal should be marked with {{proposal notice}}.
Rules
- Only autoconfirmed users may create or vote on proposals. Proposals can be created by one user or co-authored by two users.
- A given user may author/co-author a maximum of five total ongoing/unimplemented proposals. Any new proposals over this limit will be immediately canceled.
- Anyone is free to comment on proposals (provided that the page's protection level allows them to edit).
- Proposals conclude at the end of the day (23:59) two weeks after voting starts (all times GMT).
- For example, if a proposal is added at any time on Monday, August 1, 2011, the voting starts immediately and the deadline is two weeks later on Monday, August 15, at 23:59 GMT.
- Users may vote for more than one option, but they may not vote for every option available. Keep in mind that we use approval voting, so all of your votes count equally regardless of preferred order.
- Every vote should have a strong, sensible reason accompanying it. Agreeing with a previously mentioned reason given by another user is acceptable (including "per" votes), but tangential comments, heavy sarcasm, and other misleading or irrelevant quips are just as invalid as providing no reason at all.
- Users who feel that certain votes were cast in bad faith or which truly have no merit can address the votes in the comments section. Users can ask a voter to clarify their position, point out mistakes or flaws in their arguments, or call for the outright removal of the vote if it lacks sufficient reasoning. Users may not remove or alter the content of anyone else's votes. Voters can remove or rewrite their own vote(s) at any time, but the final decision to remove another user's vote lies solely with the wiki staff.
- Users can also use the comments section to bring up any concerns or mistakes in regards to the proposal itself. In such cases, it's important the proposer addresses any concerns raised as soon as possible. Even if the supporting side might be winning by a wide margin, that should be no reason for such questions to be left unanswered. They may point out any missing details that might have been overlooked by the proposer, so it's a good idea as the proposer to check them frequently to achieve the most accurate outcome possible.
- If a user makes a vote and is subsequently blocked for any amount of time, their vote is removed. However, if the block ends before the proposal ends, then the user in question holds the right to re-cast their vote. If a proposer is blocked, their vote is removed and "(blocked)" is added next to their name in the "Proposer:" line of the proposal, which runs until its deadline as normal. If the proposal passes, it falls to the supporters of the idea to enact any changes in a timely manner.
- Proposals cannot contradict an already ongoing proposal or overturn the decision of a previous proposal that concluded less than four weeks (28 days) ago.
- If one week before a proposal's initial deadline, the first place option is ahead of the second place option by eight or more votes and the first place option has at least 80% approval, then the proposal concludes early. Wiki staff may tag a proposal with "Do not close early" at any time to prevent an early close, if needed.
- Tag the proposal with {{early notice}} if it is on track for an early close. Use {{proposal check|early=yes}} to perform the check.
- Any proposal where none of the options have at least four votes will be extended for another week. If after three extensions, no options have at least four votes, the proposal will be listed as "NO QUORUM." The original proposer then has the option to relist said proposal to generate more discussion.
- If a proposal reaches its deadline and there is a tie for first place, then the proposal is extended for another week.
- If a proposal reaches its deadline and the first place option is ahead of the second place option by three or more votes, then the first place option must have over 50% approval to win. If the margin is only one or two votes, then the first place option must have at least 60% approval to win. If the required approval threshold is not met, then the proposal is extended for another week.
- Use {{proposal check}} to automate this calculation; see the template page for usage instructions and examples.
- Proposals can be extended a maximum of three times. If a consensus has not been reached by the fourth deadline, then the proposal fails and cannot be re-proposed until at least four weeks after the last deadline.
- All proposals are archived. The original proposer must take action accordingly if the outcome of the proposal dictates it. If it requires the help of an administrator, the proposer can ask for that help.
- After a proposal passes, it is added to the appropriate list of "unimplemented proposals" below and is removed once it has been sufficiently implemented.
- For sizeable projects, a proposal author or wiki staff member may create a PipeProject page to serve as a portal for an unimplemented proposal. This is linked from the unimplemented proposals list and can contain progress tracking, implementation guidelines, resource links, a list of users working on the project, etc.
- If the wiki staff deem a proposal unnecessary or potentially detrimental to the upkeep of the Super Mario Wiki, they have the right to cancel it at any time.
- Proposals can only be rewritten or canceled by their proposer within the first four days of their creation. However, proposers can request that their proposal be canceled by a staff member at any time, provided they have a valid reason for it. Please note that canceled proposals must also be archived.
- Unless there is major disagreement about whether certain content should be included, there should not be proposals about creating, expanding, rewriting, or otherwise fixing up pages. To organize efforts about improving articles on neglected or completely missing subjects, try setting up a collaboration thread on the forums.
- Proposals cannot be made about promotions and demotions. Staff changes are discussed internally and handled by the bureaucrats.
- No joke proposals. Proposals are serious wiki matters and should be handled professionally. Joke proposals will be deleted on sight.
- Proposals must have a status quo option (e.g. Oppose, Do nothing) unless the status quo itself violates policy.
Basic proposal formatting
Copy and paste the formatting below to get started; your username and the proposal deadline will automatically be substituted when you save the page. Update the bracketed variables with actual information, and be sure to replace the whole variable including the square brackets, so "[insert info here]" becomes "This is the inserted information" and not "[This is the inserted information]". Proposals presenting multiple alternative courses of action can have more than two voting options, but the objective(s) of each voting option must be clearly defined. Such options should also be kept to a minimum, and if something comes up in the comments, the proposal can be amended as necessary.
===[insert a title for your proposal here]=== [describe what issue this proposal is about and what changes you think should be made to improve how the wiki handles that issue] '''Proposer''': {{User|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}}<br> '''Deadline''': {{subst:#time:F j, Y|+2 weeks}}, 23:59 GMT ====[option title (e.g. Support, Option 1)]: [brief summary of option]==== #{{User|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} Per proposal. ====[option title (e.g. Oppose, Option 2)]: [brief summary of option]==== ====Comments ([brief proposal title])====
Autoconfirmed users will now be able to vote on your proposal. Remember that you can vote on your own proposal just like the others.
To vote for an option, just insert #{{User|[your username here]}}
at the bottom of the section of your choice. Just don't forget to add a valid reason for your vote behind that tag if you are voting on another user's proposal. If you are voting on your own proposal, you can simply say "Per proposal."
Poll proposal formatting
As an alternative to the basic proposal format, users may choose to create a poll proposal when one larger issue can be broken down into multiple subissues that can be resolved independently of each other. Poll proposals concerning multiple pages must have good justification for using the poll proposal format rather than individual talk page proposals or else will be canceled (for example, in the case of the princesses poll proposal, there are valid consistency concerns which make it worthwhile to consider these three articles simultaneously, but for routine article size splits, there is no need to abandon using standard TPPs for each).
In a poll proposal, each option is essentially its own mini-proposal with a deadline and suboption headings. A poll proposal can have a maximum of 20 options, and the rules above apply to each option as if it were its own proposal: users may vote on any number of options they wish, and individual options may close early or be extended separately from the rest. If an option fails to achieve quorum or reach a consensus after three extensions, then the status quo wins for that option by default. If all options fail, then nothing will be done.
To create a poll proposal, copy and paste the formatting below to get started; your username and the option deadlines will automatically be substituted when you save the page. Update the bracketed variables with actual information, and be sure to replace the whole variable including the square brackets, so "[insert info here]" becomes "This is the inserted information" and not "[This is the inserted information]".
===[insert a title for your proposal here]=== [describe what issue this proposal is about and what changes you think should be made to improve how the wiki handles that issue] '''Proposer''': {{User|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ====[option title (e.g. Option 1)]: [brief summary of option]==== '''Deadline''': {{subst:#time:F j, Y|+2 weeks}}, 23:59 GMT ;Support #{{User|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} Per proposal. ;Oppose ====[option title (e.g. Option 2)]: [brief summary of option]==== '''Deadline''': {{subst:#time:F j, Y|+2 weeks}}, 23:59 GMT ;Support #{{User|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} Per proposal. ;Oppose ====[option title (e.g. Option 3)]: [brief summary of option]==== '''Deadline''': {{subst:#time:F j, Y|+2 weeks}}, 23:59 GMT ;Support #{{User|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} Per proposal. ;Oppose ====Comments ([brief proposal title])====
For the purposes of the ongoing proposals list, a poll proposal's deadline is the latest deadline of any ongoing option(s). A poll proposal is archived after all of its options have settled, and it is listed as one single proposal in the archive. It is considered to have "passed" if one or more options were approved by voters (resulting in a change from the status quo), and it is considered to have "failed" if all options were rejected by voters and no change in the status quo was made.
Talk page proposals
Proposals concerning a single page or a limited group of pages are held on the most relevant talk page regarding the matter. All of the above proposal rules also apply to talk page proposals. Place {{TPP}} under the section's heading, and once the proposal is over, replace the template with {{settled TPP}}. Proposals dealing with a large amount of splits, merges, or deletions across the wiki should still be held on this page.
All active talk page proposals must be listed below in chronological order (new proposals go at the bottom) using {{ongoing TPP}}. Include a brief description of the proposal while also mentioning any pages affected by it, a link to the talk page housing the discussion, the proposal author(s), and the deadline. If the proposal involves a page that is not yet made, use {{fake link}} to communicate its title in the description. Linking to pages not directly involved in the talk page proposal is not recommended, as it clutters the list with unnecessary links.
List of ongoing talk page proposals
Deletions
None at the moment.
Moves
- Move Donkey Kong Planet to DKTV (discuss) by Kaptain Skurvy; Deadline: June 17, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Move Hachisuke to Hudson Bee (discuss) by Camwoodstock; Deadline: June 19, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Move "Luigi Raceway (theme)" to "3 Raceways/Wario Stadium" (discuss) by DryKirby64; Deadline: June 24, 2025, 23:59 GMT
Merges
- Merge Krem Flag with Level Flag (discuss) by PrincessPeachFan; Deadline: June 16, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Merge Kamek (Red), Kamek (White) and Kamek (Green) with the colored Magikoopas (discuss) by Kirby the Formling; Deadline: June 16, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Merge each of the Skillshot articles back to that page (discuss) by Stache; Deadline: June 21, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Merge General Klump to Klump (discuss) by Kaptain Skurvy; Deadline: June 22, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Merge Neo Bowser Castle to Bowser's Castle (discuss) by Salmancer; Deadline: June 24, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Merge Smooch (Paper Mario) and Smooch (Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door) (discuss) by Technetium; Deadline: June 25, 2025, 23:59 GMT
Splits
- Split Goom Battalion, Koopa Troopa Paratroopa Joint Task Force and Bro. Brigade into their own articles (discuss) by PrincessPeachFan; Deadline: June 16, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Split the Mega Guy from Yoshi's New Island (discuss) by Sorbetti; Deadline: June 19, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Split Super Green Watermelon, Super Red Watermelon and Super Blue Watermelon from their respective articles (discuss) by Sorbetti; Deadline: June 21, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Split Mushroom Castle from Peach's Castle (discuss) by CyonOfGaia; Deadline: June 21, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Split Super Mario 64: Shindō Pak Taiō Version from Super Mario 64 (discuss) by Nelsonic; Deadline: June 21, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Split snd_test from tech demo (discuss) by Nelsonic; Deadline: June 22, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Split Famicom Mini Collection from Classic NES Series (discuss) by Nelsonic; Deadline: June 23, 2025, 23:59 GMT
Miscellaneous
- Determine which subjects belong in Category:Aliens (discuss) by Technetium; Deadline: June 14, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Apply the minigame category to Mic Space or split Bonus Mic Game from it (discuss) by Snessy; Deadline: June 15, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Re-order the ratings template based by country and region (discuss) by PanchamBro; Deadline: June 16, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Determine what to do with Template:Lost (discuss) by Camwoodstock; Deadline: June 16, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Separate appearances of "Fairy Fountain" from "World 3 Map (Water Land)" (discuss) by DryKirby64; Deadline: June 16, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Group Mario Kart Tour and Mario Kart Live: Home Circuit with other Mario Kart games (discuss) by Hewer; Deadline: June 17, 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Add Purple Captain Toad to the members section of the Toad Brigade article (discuss) by Weegie baby; Deadline: June 23, 2025, 23:59 GMT
Unimplemented proposals
Proposals
Break alphabetical order in enemy lists to list enemy variants below their base form, EvieMaybe (ended May 21, 2024) |
Standardize sectioning for Super Mario series game articles, Nintendo101 (ended July 3, 2024) |
Use the classic and classic link templates when discussing classic courses in Mario Kart Tour, YoYo (ended October 2, 2024) |
Split major RPG appearances of recurring locations, EvieMaybe (ended December 16, 2024) |
Split Mario & Luigi badges and remaining accessories, Camwoodstock (ended February 1, 2025) |
Merge intro/outro sections, rename Gameplay section to "Overview" for Mario Party minigame articles, ToxBoxity64 (ended March 1, 2025) |
Allow English Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia names to be mentioned on articles where they are not the title, Hewer (ended March 27, 2025) |
Make a guideline for covering generic subjects that have a recurring and recognizable design in the Mario series, Koopa con Carne (ended May 4, 2025) |
Split every song from the "List of (show) songs" articles, Kaptain Skurvy (ended May 31, 2025) |
Create articles for Donkey Konga series music, Ahemtoday (ended June 9, 2025) |
Talk page proposals
Split all the clothing, Doc von Schmeltwick (ended September 12, 2021) |
Split machine parts, Robo-Rabbit, and flag from Super Duel Mode, Doc von Schmeltwick (ended September 30, 2022) |
Make bestiary list pages for the Minion Quest and Bowser Jr.'s Journey modes, Doc von Schmeltwick (ended January 11, 2024) |
Allow separate articles for Diddy Kong Pilot (2003)'s subjects, Doc von Schmeltwick (ended August 3, 2024) |
Create articles for specified special buildings in Super Mario Run, Salmancer (ended November 15, 2024) |
Create a catch-all Poltergust article, Blinker (ended January 21, 2025) |
Give the Cluck-A-Pop Prizes articles, Camwoodstock (ended January 31, 2025) |
Split the Animal Crossing series (now Crossovers with Animal Crossing), Kaptain Skurvy (ended February 12, 2025) |
Split the modes in the Battles page, Mario (ended February 15, 2025) |
Split Super Mario Maker helmets from Buzzy Shell and Spiny Shell (red) (Draft page), PopitTart (ended March 12, 2025) |
Split Super Luigi subjects into a dedicated list article (Draft page), EvieMaybe (ended April 3, 2025) |
Split Hammer (move) from Hammer, Blinker (ended April 10, 2025) |
Deciding the fate of the last two episodes of Super Mario Maker 2 Challenges!, Rykitu (ended April 27, 2025) |
Restore general coverage for Pyramid, Doc von Schmeltwick (ended May 9, 2025) |
Split the Story Mode chapters from Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games Tokyo 2020, Kaptain Skurvy (ended May 13, 2025) |
Clean up Prohibited Command, PrincessPeachFan (ended May 13, 2025) |
Expand Ring Shot to cover other Mario Tennis games as well as Superstars, PrincessPeachFan (ended May 28, 2025) |
Split text changes in Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door (Nintendo Switch) (Draft page), Technetium (ended May 29, 2025) |
Split Baron von Zeppelin from Item Balloon, Sorbetti (ended June 4, 2025) |
Split gold variants of Pests, Sorbetti (ended June 7, 2025) |
Restrict Spring Jump coverage to Mario vs. Donkey Kong, Salmancer (ended June 9, 2025) |
Add summaries to List of advertisements (Draft page), Rykitu (ended June 11, 2025) |
Split Super Mario Party Jamboree – Nintendo Switch 2 Edition + Jamboree TV from Super Mario Party Jamboree, Daita (ended June 11, 2025) |
List of ongoing talk page proposals
Template:TPPDiscuss Template:TPPDiscuss Template:TPPDiscuss
Unimplemented proposals
Writing guidelines
None at the moment.
New features
None at the moment.
Removals
Remove removals
Removing stuff is bad. As a wiki we should be adding MORE stuff so I propose that we remove removals, therefore from now on we can only make proposals to add more things but no proposals to get rid of things.
Proposer: Waluigi Time (talk)
Deadline: April 8, 2021, 23:59 GMT
Support
- Waluigi Time (talk) MORE STUFF
- Wynn Liaw (talk) That proposal to remove Smash coverage will be the last of its kind.
- Keyblade Master (talk) All worlds begin in darkness, and all so end. M****Wiki is no different.
- TheDarkStar (talk) - more
- RHG1951 (talk) Matter can only be shifted into a different state, thus the concept of removal is false.
- Hewer (talk) The Super Wiki is perfect and therefore nothing should ever be removed from it
- Niiue (talk) We should take it a step further and merge all other wikis with the Super Wiki.
Oppose
- Glowsquid (talk) - Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
- 7feetunder (talk) This proposal is counterproductive as long as this article exists. Not to mention this one.
- Shokora (talk) – Opposing so I have grounds to remove Waluigi Time
Comments
Is this an April Fools proposal or an actual one? Nightwicked Bowser
12:03, April 1, 2021 (EDT)
- What do you think?
Wynn Liaw 12:04, April 1, 2021 (EDT)
- Well excuse me, someone had to make that kind of comment right?
Nightwicked Bowser
12:06, April 1, 2021 (EDT)
- Well excuse me, someone had to make that kind of comment right?
Delete the wiki. Then we'd no longer have anything to remove. 12:09, April 1, 2021 (EDT)
- NO that's the opposite of what I'm trying to do, read the proposal again please --
Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 12:10, April 1, 2021 (EDT)
Wouldn't the removal of removal proposals imply that this proposal would also get removed and thus cause a contradiction? BMfan08 (talk) 15:57, April 1, 2021 (EDT)
Changes
Move animal names from the Donkey Kong Country series to just their normal names
Resuming the proposal that left off here per responses in the comments. As I stated there, these animals are often referred to by just their names e.g. "Rambi", including in the credits of the first Donkey Kong Country, and in instruction manuals.
Proposer: Keyblade Master (talk)
Deadline: April 5, 2021, 23:59 GMT
Support
- Keyblade Master (talk) Per proposal.
- Scrooge200 (talk) More common and concise.
- The Mansion (talk) Sounds good to me.
- Power Flotzo (talk) Per all.
- Results May Vary (talk) Per all.
- Archivist Toadette (talk) Per all.
- Niiue (talk) Per all.
- RickTommy (talk) Per all; also, I've started a similar discussion here.
Oppose
- Hewer (talk) Per Alex95's comment on the original proposal. Princess Peach is usually just Peach, but we use the full name anyway, and it's the same with other characters that have full names like the Sonic characters (unless it's more obscure like Yoshi's 'full name'). Readers searching for the shorter title isn't a problem because of redirects. That's my understanding at least.
Comments
@Results May Vary: You need to state your reason for supporting this proposal. (T|C) 16:18, March 22, 2021 (EDT)
@Hewer: Except "Princess Peach" is used all the time, whereas "Rambi the Rhino" is barely ever used. Nightwicked Bowser
16:40, March 22, 2021 (EDT)
- What about 'Princess Daisy'? That's very rarely used as far as I know, and it's still the title. There's also the Sonic characters who rarely go by their full names within the Mario & Sonic games. Hewer
(talk · contributions · edit count) 16:46, March 22, 2021 (EDT)
- I'm not too familiar with the Sonic franchise but I assume their full titles would be used within that franchise. I should also bring up the title of Bowser, who's full title is "King Bowser" used quite often in certain games, yet we still just call him "Bowser" since that's still used more often, even in profiles. Regarding Daisy, I'm also not familiar with basically any game she appears in (see my userpage why), but looking through her profile page you seem to be right about that, most cards and stuff title her as just "Daisy" but that can be a seperate discussion. In comparison to that, "Princess Peach" is used way more often on similar cards, along with in-game profiles, so keeping that title still makes the most sense. Back to the Donkey Kong animals, I haven't seen an instance of the full titles being used outside of a single quote from Cranky Kong, which you can see on Rambi's page. Then there's the Tropical Freeze bosses, and the Legion of Stationery in Paper Mario: The Origami King, they have full titles too, but we still simply use their normal name.
Nightwicked Bowser
17:27, March 22, 2021 (EDT)
- I'm not too familiar with the Sonic franchise but I assume their full titles would be used within that franchise. I should also bring up the title of Bowser, who's full title is "King Bowser" used quite often in certain games, yet we still just call him "Bowser" since that's still used more often, even in profiles. Regarding Daisy, I'm also not familiar with basically any game she appears in (see my userpage why), but looking through her profile page you seem to be right about that, most cards and stuff title her as just "Daisy" but that can be a seperate discussion. In comparison to that, "Princess Peach" is used way more often on similar cards, along with in-game profiles, so keeping that title still makes the most sense. Back to the Donkey Kong animals, I haven't seen an instance of the full titles being used outside of a single quote from Cranky Kong, which you can see on Rambi's page. Then there's the Tropical Freeze bosses, and the Legion of Stationery in Paper Mario: The Origami King, they have full titles too, but we still simply use their normal name.
@Keyblade Master: Not to mention the Luigi's Mansion Portrait Ghosts. Green Star
19:10, March 28, 2021 (EDT)
Worship Sentry Garage
Man this wiki is almost 16 years old and no one worships Sentry Garage yet? Let's change that
Proposer: TheDarkStar (talk)
Deadline: Maybe
Yes, hail the sentry garage
- TheDarkStar (talk) - You will submit to our god
- 7feetunder (talk) I will submit if it means NO pie.
- Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) It's from Buoy Base, it must be good.
I'm fine with sentry garage, but i don't want to hail it
I'm only here for the pie; what's going on?
- Hewer (talk) I don't even like pie but it's better than this
- Ultimate Mr. L (talk) Can we make Sentry Garage into a pie?
- PinkYoshiFan (talk) Give me pie right now
No, sod off
- Waluigi Time (talk) that ain't how you spell waluigi, pal
Comments
Who should take the red-capped plumber's position?
He is dead. In order to keep this wiki alive, we have to find a replacement for him. I have listed some names which are either associated to him or similar to his name. The 7th, 8th, and 9th options are by User:Waluigi Time. The 10th option is by User:Doc von Schmeltwick.
note from waluigi time: i have edited the proposal to be better with options that aren't bad
Proposer: Wynn Liaw (talk)
Deadline: April 8, 2021, 23:59 GMT
Luigi
- Ultimate Mr. L (talk) On the condition that he takes the form of his superior alter ego.
- 7feetunder (talk) On the condition that he does NOT take the aforementioned form. Instead, Baby Luigi should be our new overlord. Otherwise, the wiki will just be taken over by the Shroobs instead.
Wario
- 7feetunder (talk) The red guy wasn't fat enough.
Link
- Ultimate Mr. L (talk) His name starts with L.
- RickTommy (talk)
Maria
- Keyblade Master (talk) As O'Chunks says
Marie
- TheDarkStar (talk) - We just had March 13 this is plausible
- Mario jc (talk)
DO IT
Marth
Martin Scorsese
- Ultimate Mr. L (talk) He could take the series in a bold cinematic direction. More importantly, his name also starts with Mar.
- Mario jc (talk) Sure. He's no Marvel, though.
WAAAAALUIGI
- Waluigi Time (talk) Best character in the franchise
- Results May Vary (talk) Per Waluigi Time, if Shigeru Miyamoto won't respect Waluigi, it's our duty to give him the recognition that he deserves.
Steve from Minecraft
- Waluigi Time (talk) Another good option
sans.
- Waluigi Time (talk) hehe funny skeleton
DR. ROBOTNIK
- Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) PIIIIIIIIIIIIIINGAAAAAAAAAAAAS!!!!!
- AwdryFan1997 (talk) They already look identical.
Pirate Goomba
- The Mansion (talk) See below.
Pink Donkey Kong Jr.
Leave it
- Hewer (talk) We'll be fine without him he was annoying anyway
- Ultimate Mr. L (talk) Not my first choice, but if all else fails, a blank space is more appealing than a commie sociopath.
Comments
This list is terrible, here's some better ones we can use
-- Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 12:21, April 1, 2021 (EDT)
- You can add to it if you want.
Wynn Liaw 12:22, April 1, 2021 (EDT)
- cool thanks --
Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 12:29, April 1, 2021 (EDT)
- What, no other fat red guy with mustache? Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 12:56, April 1, 2021 (EDT)
- cool thanks --
where's noshi. --Glowsquid (talk) 13:07, April 1, 2021 (EDT)
No Bowser smh 04:54, April 2, 2021 (EDT)
Miscellaneous
Pie
Pie
Proposer: Pie
Deadline: Pie
Pie
- Alex95 (talk) - Pie
- Wynn Liaw (talk) 3.14159...
- Waluigi Time (talk) Yum
- The Mansion (talk) When the moon hits your eye
- Ultimate Mr. L (talk) I want my pie with some spectral jelly.
- PinkYoshiFan (talk) Per Wynn Liaw.
- Niiue (talk) π
- AwdryFan1997 (talk) The one true religion!
Pie
- TheDarkStar (talk) - I don't know guys maybe this pie is better
- Hewer (talk) This one tastes better than the other two I verified
- Power Flotzo (talk) Yes please.
Pie
- RHG1951 (talk) Pie pie, pie pie pie pie pie pie pie. Pie, pie pie pie pie pie pie. Pie pie, pie pie.
- Keyblade Master (talk) Insert James May quote "That's a pie" from the Top Gear Motorhome Racing
- Ultimate Mr. L (talk) Both this one and the first are delicious. Don't listen to liars pushing the second.
- RickTommy (talk) Wario's pie being brown is not also a reason because it's gravy, but possibly because Wario went in it.
Pie Rat Goomba
- Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) Best
- Koopa con Carne (talk) Character
Pirate Goomba
Pirate Goomba is a pirate Goomba.
Proposer: The Mansion
Deadline: When I Actually Care
Yes
- Hewer (talk) A notable member of the mushroom-like species of basic enemy characters originating from Nintendo's highly popular and successful media franchise Luigi, specifically the party video game Party 8 playable on Nintendo's seventh generation video game console known as the Wii, clad in an attire that greatly resembles that of a nefarious criminal who takes aggressive military action against and gains possession of the property of large sailing vessels intended to transport people and property upon the expanse of salt water that covers the majority of the Earth's surface without permission or legal right to do so nor intent to return said property, is a notable member of the mushroom-like species of basic enemy characters originating from Nintendo's highly popular and successful media franchise Luigi, specifically the party video game Party 8 playable on Nintendo's seventh generation video game console known as the Wii, clad in an attire that greatly resembles that of a nefarious criminal who takes aggressive military action against and gains possession of the property of large sailing vessels intended to transport people and property upon the expanse of salt water that covers the majority of the Earth's surface without permission or legal right to do so nor intent to return said property.
- TheDarkStar (talk) - yes
Definitely Yes
- Ultimate Mr. L (talk) Change his name to Pierate Goomba and we have a prime candidate to take M*rio's place.
- Waluigi Time (talk) He's a PIRATE GOOMBA
- AwdryFan1997 (talk) ALL GLORY TO THE PIRATE GOOMBA WHO IS A PIRATE GOOMBA
Pirate Goomba Wiki for April Fools' 2022
- Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) Beat ya to it hun
- Koopa con Carne (talk) glowsquid pleeeeease do this
- Keyblade Master (talk) Pirate Goomba is a Pirate Goomba is a Pirate Goomba is a Pirate Goomba is a Pirate Goomba is a Pirate Goomba is a Pirate Goomba is a Pirate Goomba
- Niiue (talk) pls